From Isolated to Collaborative: Assessing Student Learning Using Rubrics and Technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

From Isolated to Collaborative: Assessing Student Learning Using Rubrics and Technologies

Description:

Wrap-up Discussion: Obstacle. Solutions. http://concordia.csp.edu/Assessment ... Faculty make individual assessment measurements in their courses ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Gort
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Isolated to Collaborative: Assessing Student Learning Using Rubrics and Technologies


1
From Isolated to Collaborative Assessing
Student Learning Using Rubrics and Technologies
  • Amy Gort, Ph.D.
  • Michele Kieke, Ph.D.
  • Miriam Luebke, Psy.D.
  • Karen Moroz, Ed.D.

2
Outline
  • Discussion Collaborative Assessment Obstacles
  • Our history
  • Our use of technology
  • Resulting Collaborative Assessment
  • General Education
  • Major Assessment
  • Future plans
  • Wrap-up Discussion Obstacle
  • Solutions
  • http//concordia.csp.edu/Assessment/

3
Isolated vs. Collaborative Assessment
  • What is isolated assessments? Independently
    devised, course-specific assessments. Major
    assessments designed and analyzed by a single
    person.
  • What is Collaborative Assessment? Communication
    and collaboration among faculty and staff members
    related to the assessment of student learning and
    its implications for program improvement.

4
What do we communicate about?
  • What are the learning outcomes?
  • What is being taught and where?
  • What tools are used to measure student learning?
  • What are the results of the assessments?
  • What will be done in response to the results?
  • Based on the data what needs to be done to
    improve?

5
What obstacles to collaborative assessment have
you experienced on your campus?
6
Obstacles to Collaborative Assessment
  • Click to add text

7
Concordia University, St. Paul
  • Comprehensive, Lutheran university
  • 2236 Students
  • 969 Traditional-age Students (FT and PT)
  • 551 Degree Completion Students (FT and PT)
  • 716 Graduate Students (FT and PT)
  • 106 full-time faculty, gt250 adjunct faculty
  • 49 BA programs, 13 MA programs

8
A Chronological View
  • Course-specific learning outcomes, one person
    doing
  • program assessment
  • Assessment Council is set up
  • Adopted assessment software
  • Development of general competencies (Gen. Ed.)
  • General competency rubric development in
  • multi-disciplinary teams, mapping assessments
  • Revision of major outcomes, rubric development
  • Assessment report review process implemented
  • Experiencing our highest level of assessment
  • participation and collaboration

9
Assessment Leadership
10
Assessment Council
  • Representatives from each college, student
    services and institutional research
  • Faculty members are reassigned 3 workload credits
    per year for this council
  • Each representative acts as a liaison and
    facilitates conversations about assessment
  • Each representative is accountable for assessment
    in their college
  • Each representative interacts with dean

11
Benefits of Using Technology to Manage Assessment
  • Promotes shared learning outcomes and rubrics
  • Manages and aggregates data
  • Promotes quantitative data analysis
  • Makes longitudinal analysis possible
  • Allows tracking of individual students
  • Simplifies assessment setup
  • Provides an easy-to-read report

See Handout
12
eLumen Achievement System
  • Faculty make individual assessment measurements
    in their courses
  • Individual assessments can be captured to assess
    learning outcomes at the course-, major-, and
    university-level
  • Forces the use of descriptive rubrics which
    clarifies expectations
  • Assessment set-up and reporting
  • enhances collaboration

13
(No Transcript)
14
Example General Competencies
  • Writing
  • Critical Thinking
  • Quantitative Reasoning
  • Information Literacy
  • Oral Communication
  • Values Development (Aesthetic, Spiritual,
    Interpersonal, and Global)

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
eLumen has Increased Collaborative Assessment
  • Assessments using descriptive rubrics
  • Faculty members are sharing rubrics
  • Need to map out where assessments occur
    throughout a given program
  • Aggregated data has broadened the discussion
  • Engages full-time and part-time faculty
  • by showing the big picture

21
Keys to Collaborative Rubric Development Gen.
Ed.
  • Interdisciplinary Teams Developed the General
    Competency Rubrics
  • Two competencies were chosen for each area of the
    general education curriculum

22
Example Writing Competency
23
(No Transcript)
24
Keys to Collaborative Rubric Development
Major/Program
  • Development of Program-wide Learning Outcomes
  • Department members collaborated on the outcomes
    and rubrics
  • Department members all use the same
  • Rubrics
  • Many share rubrics with students

25
Partial Map for the Biology Major
26
Whats Next?
  • Co-curricular Assessments
  • Service Learning
  • Writing Center
  • Student Support Service
  • Student Newspaper
  • eLumen as an Advising Tool
  • Student access to their Assessments
  • Continued Program Development

27
Obstacles to Collaborative Assessment
  • Obstacles

28
Thank you
  • Karen Moroz, Ed.D., moroz_at_csp.edu
  • Shellie Kieke, Ph.D., kieke_at_csp.edu
  • Miriam Luebke, Psy.D., luebke_at_csp.edu
  • Amy Gort, Ph.D., gort_at_csp.edu
  • Resources available at
  • http//concordia.csp.edu/assessment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com