Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In Collaboration with Randall K. Smith Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In Collaboration with Randall K. Smith Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby

Description:

Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic ... K. Smith. Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby. ITAMP Workshop ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In Collaboration with Randall K. Smith Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby


1
Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray
Spectroscopic DiagnosticsNancy S.
BrickhouseHarvard-Smithsonian Center for
AstrophysicsIn Collaboration with Randall K.
SmithAcknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana
Kotochigova and Kate Kirby
ITAMP Workshop High Accuracy Atomic Physics in
Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics 8 Aug 2006
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Case Studies from X-ray Spectroscopy
  • Fe XVII 3C/3D
  • Ne IX density and temperature diagnostics
  • Fe XVIII and XIX temperature diagnostics
  • Conclusions

3
Overview X-Ray Spectroscopy
  • High Resolution
  • ?/?? 1000 from gratings, compared with CCD ?/??
    10 - 50
  • Strong lines of H- and He-like ions
  • and Fe L-shell
  • Most line profiles unresolved
  • Spectral models
  • Collisionally ionized plasmas stellar coronae,
    SNR, galaxies, clusters of galaxies
  • Photoionized plasmas
  • X-ray binaries, AGN, planetary nebulae

4
Benchmarking the ATOMDB
  • ATOMDB (http//cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb)
  • - Astrophysical Plasma Emission Database
    (APED) input atomic data
  • - Output collisional ionization models from
    the Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code (APEC)
  • http//cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb/WebGUIDE
  • (Smith et al. 2001)
  • Emission Line Project
  • Goal to use the Chandra calibration data to
    benchmark the collisional models
  • What accuracy do we need and why?

5
Physical Conditions Determined from X-ray
Spectroscopy
  • Electron Temperature
  • and Temperature Distribution
  • Electron Density
  • Elemental Abundances
  • - Relative
  • - Absolute (lines/continuum)
  • Opacity
  • Charge State in
  • Time-Dependent (Non-
  • Equilibrium Ionization) Plasma

Yohkoh

We really want to understand physical processes
e.g. coronal heating, shocks, accretion, winds
6
Fe XVII 3C/3D
  • In general, neon-like Fe XVII is formed over a
    very broad temperature range.
  • We observe Fe XVII lines in most
  • stellar coronal spectra.
  • In solar active regions, it is formed near
  • the peak temperature and thus produces very
    strong emission lines.
  • The solar 3C line has long been thought to be
    resonance scattered (gf 2.7) in the solar
    corona.
  • 3C 2s2 2p6 1S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 1P1 ?15.014
  • 3D 2s2 2p6 1S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 3D1 ?15.261

TRACE Image in Fe IX
7
Solutions to the Long-Standing Fe XVII 3C/3D
Problem
  • Anomalously low 3C/3D line ratios in solar
    active regions from resonance scattering? (Rugge
    McKenzie 1985)
  • t 2.0 (Schmelz et al. 1997)

Fe XVII 3C --
-- O VIII Ly ?
-- Fe XVI
-- Fe XVII 3D
Sample Data from Solar Maximum Mission FCS
Brickhouse Schmelz 2006
8
Recent Results
  • 3D is blended w/ inner shell Fe XVI
  • Brown et al. 2001
  • Experiment Laming et al. 2001 Brown et al.
    1998
  • Theory Chen Pradhan 2002 Doron Behar
    2002
  • Loch et al. 2006 Gu 2003 ? still 15
    higher than lab
  • Chen 2006 ? 5-10 (also Chen et al. 2006,
    PRA on Ni XIX)
  • For same observed ratio, optical depth depends on
    predicted value
  • 3C/3D 4.20 ? t 0.42
  • 3C/3D 3.30 ? t 0.17
  • 3C/3D 2.85 ? t 0.032
  • The 3C line is optically thin in solar active
    regions!
  • Brickhouse Schmelz 2006

9
Therefore, the TRACE Fe XV line is not optically
thick either!
Active Region
Prominence
Fe IX Fe XII
Fe XV
Brickhouse Schmelz 2006
10
(No Transcript)
11
Ne IX R-ratio and G-ratio
  • Classic He-like diagnostics
  • R-ratio f/i is density-sensitive.
  • G-ratio (f i)/r is temperature-
    sensitive.
  • f forbidden 1s2 1S0 - 1s2s 3S1
  • i intercombination 1s2 1S0 - 1s2p 3P2
  • 1s2 1S0 -
    1s2p 3P1
  • r resonance 1s2 1S0 - 1s2p 1P1

12
Capella Ne IX Spectral Region
  • Temperature from Ne IX G-ratio is too low Ness et
    al. 2003
  • Mg XI and O VII also give temperatures too low
    in other stars
  • Testa et al. 2004

13
Blending with Fe XIX in the Ne IX Spectral Region
Model Fe XIX wavelengths from HULLAC (1
accuracy)
With EBIT ? measurements (Brown et al. 2002,
5-10 mÅ)
14
Fe XIX Model Wavelengths from Dirac-Fock-Sturm
Method Kotochigova, in progress
With this Fe XIX model we can match the positions
of all features in the spectrum.
15
Recent Results
New Ne IX G-ratio calculations (Chen et al. 2006,
PRA)
G-ratio agrees with LLNL EBIT measurements of
Wargelin (PhD Thesis 1993)
Derived T from Capella in better agreement
16
Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios
-- Fe XVIII
LETG 355 ks
LETG 355 ks
-- Fe XVIII
HETG/MEG 300 ks
HETG/HEG 300 ks
IEUV OEUV Te exp
(-?E/kTe) IX-ray OX-rayTe
17
Observed/Predicted Line Ratios
All X-ray/EUV line ratios are larger than
predicted (by all codes). For the strongest
lines, the codes agree discrepancies are 30
for Fe XVIII and a factor of 2 for Fe
XIX. Predictions are based on the EMD with its
peak at 6 MK.
Fe XVIII
EUV
Fe XIX
FUV
X-ray
Desai et al. 2005
18
Te-Dependence of Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios
  • Discrepancies not from
  • excitation rate
  • uncertainties
  • calibration uncertainties
  • absorption
  • time variability
  • Simple Te diagnostics not
  • consistent with the ionization
  • state of the plasma
  • Motivated consideration of
  • time-dependent NEI effects in
  • impulsively heated loops.


6 MK EMD peak
19
Non-Equilibrium Ionization ?
  • EMD models assume collisional ionization
    equilibrium
  • Flux e(Te) ?Ne2 dV
  • In an NEI plasma, the charge state lags the
    instantaneous temperature Te
  • Ne?t determines the charge state
  • For a given Ne and Te , ionization is very fast
    compared with recombination
  • Mass conservation (Ne dV const) implies that a
    coronal loop, impulsively heated and then cooled
    by radiation and conduction, will emit primarily
    during recombination.


20
Fe XIX / Fe XVIII
Fe XVII / Fe XVIII
Additional data from other stars Courtesy P.
Desai

21
Ionization Balance?
Decreased ionization rate x 2
  • Recombination rate coefficients accurate to 30
  • Ionization rate coefficients?

22
Conclusions
  • Accurate atomic data are a big investment
    priorities should be based on astrophysical
    importance and needs
  • For most important diagnostics, line ratios
    accurate to 10 or better are possible
  • Interesting astrophysical processes can be
    explored (e.g. non-equilibrium ionization) with
    accurate diagnostics
  • Wavelengths need to be accurate to 1 mÅ
  • 3-way collaboration among astrophysics,
    experiment and theory is needed
  • Experiments cant substitute for theory

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com