Stefan Hild, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Stefan Hild,

Description:

Advanced Virgo optical design: Arm cavities with adjustable Finesse. Stefan Hild ... Initial Virgo has no wedges in the input mirrors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Stefa46
Category:
Tags: design | hild | stefan | virgo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stefan Hild,


1
Advanced Virgo optical designArm cavities with
adjustable Finesse
  • Stefan Hild,
  • Andreas Freise, Simon Chelkowski
  • University of Birmingham
  • Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix
  • AEI Hannover
  • Maddalena Mantovani
  • EGO, Cascina
  • March 2008, GEO-simulation WS

2
Overview
  • Requirements for Advanced Virgo arm cavities
    Etalon effect vs wedges.
  • New concept for advanced GW detectors that
    combines wedges and etalon effect.
  • Performance of an ideal etalon
  • Example of optical system design Influence of
    etalon imperfections
  • Numerical simulations
  • Analytical approximations
  • Influence onto alignment signals
  • Higher-order mode buildup

3
Motivation Input mirror without wedge
  • Initial Virgo has no wedges in the input mirrors
  • The etalon effect could be used for adjusting the
    cavity finesse (compensating for differential
    losses)
  • If etalon effect is not controlled it might cause
    problems

4
Motivation Input mirror featuring a wedge
  • Used by initial LIGO
  • Reflected beams from AR coating can be separated
    from main beam gt pick-off beams provide
    additional ports for generation of control
    signals.
  • No etalon effect available.

5
What to use for Advanced VIRGO?Etalon or Wedges
??
  • For AdV possibility to adjust cavity finesse gets
    more important (higher cavity finesse,
    DC-readout).
  • For AdV possibility to create more and better
    control signals seem desirable.

Is there a possibilty to have both for Advanced
Virgo ??
Fortunately YES !
6
Advanced Virgo symmetric beam geometry
  • Increase beam size at mirrors gt reduce thermal
    noise contribution of the test masses.
  • Move beam waist away from input test mass

Is there still an etalon effect in the
(flat/curved) input mirror ?
7
Etalon effectflat/flat vs curved/flat
  • Flat/flat etalon
  • Perfect overlap of wavefronts
  • Fortunately mirror curvature of a few km is not
    so far from flat.
  • Simulations show a reduced etalon effect in
    curved/flat input mirror is still present

8
Etalon effectflat/flat vs curved/flat
  • Flat/flat etalon
  • Perfect overlap of wavefronts

Still we have to choose either wegde in input
mirror (Pick-off beams available) or no wedge in
input mirror (Etalon effect available)
  • Curved/flat etalon
  • Mismatch of wavefront curvature
  • Fortunately mirror curvature of a few km are not
    so far flat.
  • Simulations show a reduced etalon effect in
    curved/flat input mirror is still present

9
Overview
  • Requirements for Advanced Virgo arm cavities
    Etalon effect vs wedges.
  • New concept for advanced GW detectors that
    combines wedges and etalon effect.
  • Performance of an ideal etalon
  • Example of optical system design Influence of
    etalon imperfections
  • Numerical simulations
  • Analytical approximations
  • Influence onto alignment signals
  • Higher order mode buildup

10
IDEA Wedges at input mirrors and etalon effect
at end mirrors
  • Wedge at input mirrors
  • Allows for additional pick-off beams
  • (Concentrate on compensating thermal lensing in
    input mirror)
  • Use etalon effect at end test mass
  • Replace AR-coating by a coating of about 10
    reflectivity.
  • Ideally use a curved back surface (same curvature
    as front).
  • End mirror behaves similarly to flat/flat etalon.

11
Now lets have a lookat numbers for Advanced
Virgo
12
Overview
  • Requirements for Advanced Virgo arm cavities
    Etalon effect vs wedges.
  • New concept for advanced GW detectors that
    combines wedges and etalon effect.
  • Performance of an ideal etalon
  • Example of optical system design Influence of
    etalon imperfections
  • Numerical simulations
  • Analytical approximations
  • Influence onto alignment signals
  • Higher order mode buildup

13
Starting with a single AdV arm cavity
  • Using a single AdV arm cavity (no IFO).
  • Parameters used
  • IM trans 0.007
  • IM loss 50 ppm
  • EM trans 50 ppm
  • EM loss 50 ppm
  • AR coatings 0ppm
  • IM curvature 1910m
  • EM curvature 1910m
  • Input 1W
  • Figure of merrit intra cavity power, i.e. loss
    compensation.

Parameters taken from these 2 documents
14
Influence of losses inside the cavity
  • Imperfection of optics (surface coatings) might
    cause different losses in the arm cavities
    differential losses.

15
End mirror as curved etalon (optimal solution)
  • Simulation done with Finesse.
  • Back surface of end mirror curved (1910m).
  • AR coating replaced by coating of 10 or 20
    reflectivity.
  • R0.1 allows adjustment range of 10W (?65ppm)
  • R0.2 allows adjustment range of 16W (?95ppm)

16
Optimal solution curved Etalon
  • Alternative figures of merrit
  • Transmittance of end mirror (etalon)
  • Finesse of arm cavity

17
Etalon changes optical phase
  • When changing the etalon tuning the optical-phase
    changes as well. (noise!)
  • The two etalon surfaces build a compound mirror,
    whose apparent position depends on the etalon
    tuning.

18
Requirement for temperature stability of etalon
substrate
  • Can calculate require-ment for temperature
    stability for Advanced Virgo etalon
  • Using worst case 1.22pm/deg
  • dn/dT 1.09e-5/K
  • Substrate thickness 10cm

Example _at_100Hz 4e-11K/sqrt(Hz)
This requirement is still 2 orders of magnitude
above (safer) than temperature stability required
from dL/dT of the substrates.
19
Everything fine as long Etalon matches the
specs but what if not ??gt need to check !!
20
Overview
  • Requirements for Advanced Virgo arm cavities
    Etalon effect vs wedges.
  • New concept for advanced GW detectors that
    combines wedges and etalon effect.
  • Performance of an ideal etalon
  • Example of optical system design Influence of
    etalon imperfections
  • Numerical simulations
  • Analytical approximations
  • Influence onto alignment signals
  • Higher order mode buildup

21
Optical design Check system integrity for
deviations from specs
  • A deviation in the reflectivity of the etalon
    coating
  • Only changes tuning range (no problem)
  • A deviation in the relative misalignment
    (parallelism) and relative curvature of the two
    etalon surfaces
  • Imperfect wave front overlap
  • Reduces tuning range
  • Beam shape distortions

22
FFT-simulation of a non-perfect etalon
  • Using R. Schillings WaveProp, (http//www.rzg.mpg
    .de/ros/WaveProp/)
  • Parameters
  • Field 256x256
  • Computing 3000 roundtrips
  • End mirror front
  • 50ppm transmission
  • R_c 1910m
  • End mirror back
  • Varying three parameters
  • Reflectance
  • Misalignment (parallelism)
  • Curvature

23
Analytic Approximations using Higher-Order Modes
  • Reflection at a (slightly) misaligned component
    can be characterised by scattering into higher
    order TEM modes
  • This model is valid for misalignments below half
    the diffraction angle (paraxial approximation)
  • The amplitude in the outgoing fields is given by
    coupling coefficients knmnm
  • For small misalignments the coupling coefficients
    knmnm can be approximated. The amount of light
    which remains in a TEM00 mode is given by
  • (q is the Gaussian beam parameter of the
    light at the mirror)

24
Misalignment of etalon back surface
  • Strong influence of relative alignment of etalon
    surfaces.
  • Question What accuracy can state of the art
    manufacturing provide?
  • Example Initial Virgo input mirrors (flat/flat)
    1urad

25
Curvature deviation of etalon back surface
  • Curvature mismatch has only moderate influence to
    tuning range of the etalon.

26
!!! KEEP IN MIND !!!For this example
  • Numerical simulations and analytical
    approximation
  • Can used to understand optics
  • Are used to derive specifications
  • Both do not necessarily represent the reality in
    all cases
  • Optimal solution (if feasible)
  • Test concept in a prototype experiment

27
Investigating alignment signals for Advanced
Virgo with etalons
  • Aim Checking influence of perfect and
    non-perfect etalon to alignment signals
  • Performed FINESSE simulation
  • Investigating Ward and Anderson techniques

28
Alignment signals for perfect etalon
Signal in reflection Ward technique
Signal in transmission Anderson technique
10 variation
150 variation
29
Non perfect etalon TEM01-buildup in the arm
cavity
  • Misalignment of etalon back surface induces 1st
    order modes inside the arm cavities.
  • TEM01 from etalon imperfection is negligible
    compared to misalignment of the whole end test
    mass.

30
Summary
  • Advanced Virgo CAN feature wedges in the input
    mirrors AND use the etalon effect at the end
    mirrors.
  • Proposed concept allows us to build arm cavities
    with adjustable losses.
  • A curved/curved etalon would be ideal.
  • Evaluated and quantified the influence of etalon
    imperfections using numerical simulations and
    analytical approximations (tuning range,
    alignment signals)

31
Outlook
  • Potential issues to be investigated
  • Need a control system for etalon tuning (error
    signal actuator).
  • Need a value for the expected differential losses
    in Advanced Virgo in order to choose the
    reflectivity of the etalon.

32
E N D
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com