NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND PANCREATIC CANCER RISK: A NESTED CASECONTROL STUDY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND PANCREATIC CANCER RISK: A NESTED CASECONTROL STUDY

Description:

Marie Bradley, Carmel Hughes, Marie. Cantwell and Liam Murray. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research Group, & School of Pharmacy, Queen's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: qub87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND PANCREATIC CANCER RISK: A NESTED CASECONTROL STUDY


1
NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND
PANCREATIC CANCER RISK A NESTED CASE-CONTROL
STUDY
  • Marie Bradley, Carmel Hughes, Marie
  • Cantwell and Liam Murray
  • Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research
    Group, School of Pharmacy, Queens University
    Belfast

2
Overview
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Chemoprevention of cancer with NSAIDs
  • GPRD
  • Nested case-control study examining the effect of
    NSAIDs on pancreatic cancer risk using GPRD

3
Pancreatic Cancer
  • In the United Kingdom (UK) in 2006 there were
    around 7,600 cases of pancreatic cancer
    diagnosed.
  • Rapidly fatal
  • Presents at an advanced stage
  • 5th leading cause of cancer mortality, in the
    western world
  • Five year survival rate of 1.
  • As incidence and mortality increase with age, the
    pancreatic cancer burden will rise in the future,
    due to population ageing and increased life
    expectancy.

4
Known risk factors
for
pancreatic cancer
  • Smoking 4. Age
  • 2. Genetic factors/ 5. Obesity
  • Family history
  • 3. Chronic pancreatitis
  • Important to identify other aetiological factors
    for pancreatic cancer in order to improve
    prospects for primary prevention.

5
Chemoprevention of
cancer using
cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors
  • Large body of epidemiological and experimental
    evidence suggesting that exposure to aspirin and
    NSAIDs is associated with a reduced risk of
    colorectal cancer through inhibition of COX-2.
  • COX-2 expression is increased in inflammation and
    carcinogenesis.
  • COX- 2 blockade has been shown in experimental
    studies to induce apoptosis, inhibit endothelial
    cell migration, neovascularisation and the
    invasive potential of pancreatic cancer cells.
  • However evidence is limited.

6
Aims
  • Primary Aim
  • Investigation of the role of NSAIDs and
    aspirin in the aetiology/prevention of pancreatic
    cancer using the General Practice Research
    Database (GPRD)

7
The general
practice research database (GPRD)
  • GPRD is the worlds largest computerised database
    of anonymised longitudinal patient records from
    primary care.
  • Started up in 1987.
  • 3.7 million (up to standard) UTS patients.
  • 434 UTS practices across the UK.
  • 5.5 of the UK population.
  • Representative of UK population in terms of age,
    sex, and geographic distribution.

8
Methods
  • Case-control study.
  • Source population from (GPRD).
  • Patients lt85years old and had 5 years of
    follow-up, prior to the diagnosis date.
  • Cases had a diagnosis of primary malignant
    neoplasia of the exocrine pancreas between
    01/1995 and 06/2006.
  • Up to 7 controls matched with each case on
    general practice site, sex and year of birth.
  • Primary exposure of interest was exposure to
    NSAIDs/aspirin in the five years prior to the
    diagnosis date
  • One year lag time.

9
Methods
  • Total dose of NSAIDS per patient
  • (the average daily dose in units of Defined
    Daily Dose DDD).
  • Total duration of NSAID use per patient.
  • The dose (DDDs) and duration (days) of NSAID use
    per patient were divided into quartiles.
  • The effect of dose (DDDs) and duration (years)
    combined.
  • Effect of different NSAID groups.

10
Analyses
  • Conditional logistic regression analyses were
    used to generate odds ratios (OR) and 95
    confidence intervals (95 CI) associated with
    NSAID use compared to non-use.
  • All estimates of OR were adjusted for smoking
    status, Body Mass Index (BMI), alcohol use, and
    history of chronic pancreatitis, prior cancer,
    diabetes. Also adjusted for use of steroids,
    PPIs, H2RAs and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

11
Results
  • 1141 cases and 7954 controls were identified.
  • Analysis examined
  • Effect of any use
  • Effect of dose
  • Effect of duration of use
  • Effect of dose and duration
  • Effect of different groups of NSAIDs

12
1.Dose of NSAIDs used
13
2.Duration of NSAID use
14
3.Dose and Duration of
NSAID use
combined since entry
into GPRD
15
4.NSAID groups
16

Results
  • No significant reductions in risk of pancreatic
    cancer for ever use compared with never use of a
    NSAID.
  • No overall association between pancreatic cancer
    risk and the total dose of NSAIDs prescribed and
    no risk reduction was seen among subjects who
    used the highest doses of NSAIDs.
  • A 20 reduction in risk was seen among subjects
    who had been prescribed a NSAID for approximately
    2 years or longer in the 5 years before
    diagnosis.
  • A 30 reduction in pancreatic cancer risk was
    also seen in subjects who had used lower than
    average doses of NSAIDs for 5 years or more since
    entry into the GPRD.

17
Results
  • Ever use versus never use of COX-2 inhibitors and
    oxicams in the five years before the index date,
    was associated with modest reductions in
    pancreatic cancer risk (20 and 30 respectively)
    but statistical significance was not achieved and
    too few subjects were exposed to these
    preparations to allow a more detailed analysis of
    use of these drugs.

18
Discussion
  • Study strengths
  • NSAID exposure was determined by prospectively
    collected prescription data, avoiding
    self-reported exposure and its associated
    disadvantages
  • Study size
  • Representative sample

19
Conclusion
  • It therefore appears that long-term use (gt2
    years) of NSAIDs may protect against pancreatic
    cancer and that duration of use may be more
    important than dose.
  • As there was no further reduction in risk with
    use of more than one DDD per day, which
    represents a standard anti-inflammatory dose, it
    does not appear that doses which exceed those
    that are routinely used for the main indications
    of these drugs are required for prevention.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com