Title: The World Bank The Advanced Program in Accounting and Auditing Regulation
1The World Bank The Advanced Program in
Accounting and Auditing Regulation
- A new era of prudential rules and financial
reporting for insurance - Catherine Guttmann
- 16 May 2006
2Outline of presentation
- In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level - Complete, prudent, relevant, common accounting
principles as a pre requisite for assessing
insurers capital requirements and enhancing the
ability of insurers to call for capital - What are the main features of IFRS for insurance
companies (as of today, Phase I) - IFRS 4 Phase II A common valuation of
insurance liabilities for accounting and solvency
purposes ?
3In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level
- Solvency II as a consequence of insufficient
efficiency of Solvency I - 85 insurance companies have been under
regulators close scrutiny, in the last five
years in Europe, because of capital inadequacy
under Solvency I, of which 20 have ultimately
disappeared - Administrative sanction
- bankrupcy
-
- Main Reasons
- Inadequacy of the pricing of the contracts
- Under estimate of insurance liabilities,
including embedded options granted to policy
holders - Inadequate asset/liability management
- Duration
- Liquidity
-
- Inadequate reinsurance coverage linked with
insufficient insurance risk diversification - Inadequate corporate governance and internal
control
4In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level
- Solvency II as a convergence between insurance
and banking sector - More and more similar products
- e.g.
- Catastroph bond versus insurance contract
- Saving contracts
- Climatic derivatives
- In line with IAIS thinking
- more prospective assessment and control of the
risks - Insurance
- Financial
- Operational
-
- both on management and supervisors side
5In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level The Calendar
Project of Directive proposed for adoption
Phase I
Phase II
May 01 jan 03 jun 04 dec
04 may 05 apr 06 oct 06 dec 06 feb
07 jun 2007 2008 2009 2010
1999
Preparatory works
Project of Directive
Directive Solvency II
Fev 2007 Final Directive Jui 2007
Adoption 2008 Elaboration of detailled
implementation guidances 2009-2010
Transposition of the directive by each Member
State 2010 Application Solvency II Removal
of 19 Directives EU in existence
June 2004 1st wave of calls for advice
(Pillar II) Dec. 2004 2nd wave of calls for
advice (Pillar I) May 2005 3rd wave of calls
for advice (Pillar III) June 2005 Amended
Framework for consultation Sept 2005 1st
quantitative impact study (QIS 1) April 2006
2nd quantitative impact study (QIS 2) Oct 2006
1st draft of Directive Dec 2006 2nd draft of
Directive
- Inventory on Solvency I
- Assessment of the relevance / adaptation of
banking rules to insurance - Considerations into the form of a future system
of prudential control - Study leads by european insurance supervisors on
Solvency I and recommendations on the Solvency II
project -
6In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level
Key phases of short term development
SOLVENCY II
March 06
Oct 06
July 07
Feb 07
Feb 06
April 06
Sept 06
Dec 06
CEIOPS answer 3rd wave of calls for advice
Results QIS 1
Starting QIS 2 on MCR SCR)
Results QIS 2
1st draft of Directive
Directive proposed for adoption
2rd draft of Directive
Final Directive
7In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level
Solvency II
Pillar I
Pillar II
Pillar III
Capital Adequacy Value based approach -
Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) - Min. Capital
Requirement (MCR) Insurance Liabilities Risks
linked to the asset more specifically
integrated
Supervisory Review Corporate
Governance Asset/Liability Management Efficiency
of internal control Investment
policy Reinsurance program Process of
prudential supervision
Market Regulation Information for public and
control Transparency principle Information
requirements (disclosures) Financial
communication
8In line with IAIS work, new risk-based solvency
requirements (Solvency II) are underway at the EU
level
- MCR/SCR (CFA n9, 10, 11, 13, 14)
- 2 levels of solvency requirement MCR and SCR
Level 2 capital target
Surplus
Prudential graduated intervention
- Internal models
- Standard approach
SCR Solvency CapitalRequirement
Level 1 floor
MCR Min. Capital Requirement
Risk considered as unacceptableby policy holders
Insurance Liabilities
Level 0 Mortality risk
9Complete, prudent, relevant, common accounting
principles as a pre requisite for assessing
insurers capital requirements and enhancing the
ability of insurers to call for capital
- Relevant information has the quality of relevance
when it influences the economic decisions of
users by helping them evaluate past, present or
future events or confirming or correcting their
past evaluations - Prospective approach
- Unlocking of the assumptions
- Completeness no omission
- As far as possible, all items valued in the
balance sheet - e.g. guarantees, options
10Complete, prudent, relevant, common accounting
principles as a pre requisite for assessing
insurers capital requirements and enhancing the
ability of insurers to call for capital
- Common
- Same definitions (substance over form)
- Definition of financial assets and liabilities
- Definition of insurance contract
- Definition of financial risk, or insurance risk,
... - Same accounting rules
- Convergence between countries
- Convergence between insurance and banking
11Complete, prudent, relevant, common accounting
principles as a pre requisite for assessing
insurers capital requirements and enhancing the
ability of insurers to call for capital
- Prudent
- Valuations have to contend with the uncertainties
- Those uncertainties are to be recognised and
valued - However, the exercise of prudence doesnt allow
deliberate overstatement of liabilities - No double counting with solvency capital
requirement - Conclusion a prerequisite, a priori, in
coherence with IFRS framework
12What are the main features of IFRS for insurance
companies (as of today, Phase I)
- The IFRS on insurance contracts applies to all
insurance contracts (including reinsurance
contracts) and only to insurance contracts - Financial assets and liabilities of insurers
- are treated by IAS 39
- All IFRS standards apply to insurance companies
- Insurance contract definition is a definition
in substance and not a legal one - The standard on insurance contracts should then
be used for example in the banking industry
13What are the main features of IFRS for insurance
companies (as of today, Phase I)
- Definition of an insurance contract
- An insurance contract is a contract
- under which one party (the insurer) accepts
significant insurance risk from another party
(the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the
policyholder if a specified uncertain futur event
(the insured event) adversely affects the
policyholder - The policyholder is defined as a party
that has a right to compensation under an
insurance contract if an insured event occurs
14What are the main features of IFRS for insurance
companies (as of today, Phase I)
- Definition of financial and insurance risks
- An insurance risk is a risk , other that
financial risk, transferred from the holder of a
contract to the issuer - A financial risk is the risk of a possible
future change in one or more of a specified
interest rate, financial instrument price,
commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of
prices or rates, credit rating or credit index or
other variable, provided in the case of a
non-financial variable that the variable is not
specific to a party to the contract
15What are the main features of IFRS for insurance
companies (as of today, Phase I)
- Examples of insurance contracts
Are insurance contracts Are not insurance contracts
Insurance against theft or damage to property Insurance against product liability, professional liability, civil liability Disability and medical cover Life contingent annuities Death benefit Catastrophe bond if the triggering event includes a condition that the issuer of the bond suffered a specified loss Financial contracts which dont expose the insurer to significant insurance risk (investment contracts, financial reinsurance) Fronting Own insurance for example product warranty is issued directly by a manufacturer dealer or retailer Catastrophe bond triggered by an external event for which the issuer doesnt incure a specific loss
16Consequence an insurer balance sheet
17(No Transcript)
18IFRS 4 Phase II A common valuation of
insurance liabilities for accounting and solvency
purposes ?
- Agenda
- A Working Paper should be published by the
Working Group Phase II before year end 2006 - An Exposure Draft should be published in 2008
- Final standard could be published before year end
2008
Endorsement of phase II standard
Working paper published
ED published
Working Group meetings
19Main issues valuation approaches under
consideration
- Approach A Current Entry Value
- Principles Approach A measures the insurance
liability at the amount that the insurer would
charge to a policyholder today for entering into
a contract with the same remaining rights and
obligations as the existing contract. - Initial measurement
- Discounting of future projected cash flows
using current yield curve (best estimate value) - A margin for risk and uncertainty
- Valuation of an implicit margin, equal to the
difference between premiums and the best
estimate value - Next measurements
- Best estimate value is calculated on current
assumptions (economic and non economic) - The initial margin is amortised among the
duration of the contract with the release of the
risk
20Main issues valuation approaches under
consideration
- Approach B Current Exit Value (Transfer Value)
- Principles Approach B measures the insurance
liability at the amount that the insurer would
expect to have to pay today to another entity if
it transferred all its remaining contractual
rights and obligations immediately to that
entity. - Because there is no secondary market for most
insurance liabilities, that amount would need to
be estimated. - Specifically, approach B
- Measures the insurance liability as the present
value of future cash flows arising from the
contract (Uses a current risk-free discount
rate). - Does not defer acquisition costs as a separate
asset. - The measurement of the liability includes the
margin that market participants would require for
contractually assuming risks and providing
services - Margin for risks and uncertainty AND
- Margin for the servicing part included in the
insurance contract (servicing margin) - Profit at inception is limited
- by the level of the MRI and
- by the level of the Servicing margin
21Main issues valuation approaches under
consideration
Approach A "Business to Customers
Approach B "Business to Business
Asset
Asset
Net equity
Net equity
No gain at inception
Some gain at inception but limited by the SM and
the MRI
Global Margin
Servicing margin
- Separation and valuation of the 3 parts of the
contracts - exit value "best estimate"
- Margin for risks
- Servicing margin
MRU
Global margin Premiums Exit Value best
estimate
Exit Value best-estimate
Exit Value best-estimate
22Main issues valuation approaches under
consideration
- IAIS is working on a similar model so that the
same valuation for liabilities could be taken for
solvency purposes and accounting
- Questions still to be solved
- Definition of the MRU (level of confidence
Cost of capital), pattern of amortisation - Definition and level of the servicing margin
(market reference ?) - Policyholder behaviour ? Surrenders, futur
premiums, renewals - IAS 39 for investment contracts ? 39 to be
amended ? - Own credit risk
- Discretionary participating features liability
or equity or separate component of equity ?