Steve Randall - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Steve Randall

Description:

Other requirements (ETSI-specific, IPv6 logo-specific) ... Provide a key element in ensuring deployment, interoperability, security, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: STF3
Category:
Tags: element | logo | randall | steve

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steve Randall


1
ETSI Test Specifications for IPv6
ProtocolsOCG2316-17 June 2004, Sophia
Antipolis
  • Steve Randall
  • Dieter Hogrefe
  • Anthony Wiles

2
EC/EFTA Funded IPv6 Testing
  • Introduction to MTS-IPT
  • IPv6 Testing Project Overview
  • Past
  • Present
  • Future
  • Issues related to the IPv6 Testing Project
  • Meeting the needs of other TBs
  • Funding

3
ETSI TC-MTS IP Testing Group (IPT)
  • Mandate to develop generic test specifications
  • IPT main focus
  • Methodologies and techniques for IP testing
  • Development of test specifications for IP and
    IP-related technologies

4
IPv6 Testing Project
  • Project Overview

5
Project Overview ETSI Testing IPv6 - Why?!
  • Response to ETSI members needs
  • To satisfy the European Commissions mandate
  • To add value to the IPv6 Forums label program
    IPv6 Ready

6
Project Overview ETSI Members Needs
  • Provide publicly available, no-cost, standardized
    IPv6 test specifications in a standard testing
    language based upon
  • RFC requirements
  • Industry practice requirements
  • Other requirements (ETSI-specific, IPv6
    logo-specific)
  • Provide a framework for efficient development
    within ETSI of future IPv6 test specifications
    such as 3G and NGN
  • Note This project will not write 3G or NGN test
    suites

7
Project Overview The European Commissions
Mandate
  • Complement IPv6-dependent initiatives for
    e-Government, e-Business, e-Health, e-Learning,
    and e-Procurement
  • Provide a key element in ensuring deployment,
    interoperability, security, and reliability of
    the IPv6 infrastructure
  • Provide an even stronger European representation
    in the IPv6 Forums IPv6 Ready label program

8
Project Overview Adding Value to IPv6 Ready
Program
  • Publicly available, no-cost, standardized test
    specifications that the user can extend
  • Interoperability and conformance tests for both
    mandatory and optional requirements
  • Flexible basis on which specific testing
    implementations can be built

9
Project OverviewEC/EFTA Funding
  • Project proposal submitted by MTS under eEurope
    program
  • 50/50 funding ETSI EC/EFTA
  • Member States and DG Information Society have
    expressed their strong support

10
Project Overview Five Work Packages
  • WP 1 IPv6 TTCN-3 Test Development Framework
  • WP 2 IPv6 Core test specifications
  • WP 3 IPv6 IPv6 Security (IPSEC) test
    specifications
  • WP 4 IPv6 IPv6 Mobility test specifications
  • WP 5 IPv6 IPv6 Transitioning test specifications

11
Project OverviewIPv6 Project Timeline
September
March
September
March
September
STF256
WP1 Framework
WP2 Core
WP3 Security
WP4 Mobility
WP5 Transitioning
2004
2005
2006
12
IPv6 Project IssuesMeeting the Needs of Others
  • Output of the project will be
  • a library of testing specifications
  • a development framework within which library
    modules can be used to build specific test suites
  • a mechanism for selecting and characterizing
    tests
  • Inputs to the project will be
  • IETF RFCs
  • Generic requirements of 3GPP and ETSI TBs
    interested in IPv6
  • Current industry practice
  • Interests and experience of the IPv6 Forum

13
IPv6 Project IssuesFunding
  • EC/EFTA expects ETSIs 50 to include technical
    effort as well as meeting time
  • For good project management, this effort must be
    given as STF Expert time
  • MTS fortunate to have significant voluntary
    expert time offered by its members for first two
    Work Packages
  • Future eEurope projects may need to ask for funds
    from FWP

14
Points for Further Discussion
  • What is the basis for asking for future EC/EFTA
    funding?
  • Do we take EC funds as a sub-contractor purely to
    satisfy EC needs?
  • or
  • Do we seek co-funding from the EC for projects
    which are of specific interest to ETSI?
  • If the latter, how will we fund the 50
    contribution that ETSI will be expected to make?
  • Purely voluntary effort?
  • FWP/PTCC?
  • Other?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com