Class 24: Title Assurance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Class 24: Title Assurance

Description:

As between successive purchasers, a subsequent purchaser for ... What does the SJC require of title searchers? Is it too much? Petherbridge. END. Petherbridge ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: LLS1
Learn more at: https://webdb.lls.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Class 24: Title Assurance


1
Class 24 Title Assurance
  • Property Law
  • Fall 2006
  • Professor Petherbridge

2
Overview
  • Recording Acts and Examples
  • The Contents of Recorded Material
  • Luthi v. Evans
  • Orr v. Byers
  • Chain of Title Problems
  • Board of Education of Minneapolis v. Hughes
  • Guillette v. Daly Dry Wall, Inc.

Petherbridge
3
Recording Statutes Race
  • As between successive purchasers for value, the
    person who wins the race to record wins.
  • Merits?

Petherbridge
4
Recording Statutes Notice
  • As between successive purchasers, a subsequent
    purchaser for value and without notice wins.
  • Merits?

Petherbridge
5
Recording Statutes Race/Notice
  • In a race-notice jurisdiction, to be protected
    the subsequent purchaser must be (1) a BFP and
    (2) record first.
  • Merits?

Petherbridge
6
Problem 1
  • Act No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in
    land is valid against any subsequent purchaser
    whose conveyance is first recorded.
  • O conveys Greenacre to A on Wednesday. A does
    not record. The following Friday, O conveys
    Greenacre to B. On the next Monday, B records,
    the next day, A records.
  • How does the outcome differ if B knows of the
    deed from O to A before A purchases?

Petherbridge
7
Problem 2
  • Act No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in
    land is valid against a subsequent purchaser for
    value without notice thereof whose conveyance is
    first recorded.
  • O conveys Goldenacre by deed to Alice, who does
    not record. Six months later B purchases
    Goldenacre from O, knowing nothing of the O to A
    deed. A then records, followed by recording by
    B.
  • If B records first?

Petherbridge
8
Problem 3
  • Act No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in
    land is valid against any subsequent purchaser
    for value without notice thereof, unless the same
    be recorded.
  • O conveys Redacre to A, who does not record the
    deed. B, ignorant of the deed from O to A,
    purchases Redacre from O receiving a deed. A
    records. Then B conveys to C.

Petherbridge
9
Problem 2, page 582.
  • O conveys Whiteacre to A, who does not record. O
    subsequently conveys to B, who purchases in good
    faith and for valuable consideration, but does
    not record. A then records and conveys to C. C
    purchases in good faith and for valuable
    consideration. B records. C records.
  • Who prevails in a notice jurisdiction?
  • Who prevails in a race-notice jurisdiction?

Petherbridge
10
Luthi v. Evans
  • What recording act?
  • Did the assignment convey the Kufahl lease?
  • Why does the court find that the assignment,
    although recorded, does not provide constructive
    notice?
  • In a jurisdiction that does not follow this rule,
    what would Burris have had to do?
  • If the assignment described the Kufahl lease, how
    would this case have come out?

Petherbridge
11
Orr v. Byers
  • What is Idem Sonans?
  • Is it common knowledge that everyone knows the
    different spellings of proper names?
  • When will a spelling be so unusual that a person
    cannot be expected to think of it?

Petherbridge
12
Bd. of Ed. of. Minneapolis v. Hughes
  • Some Facts
  • 1906-05-17 O delivers deed not identifying
    grantee to purchaser Hughes.
  • 1909-04-27 O conveys to DW, the deed is not
    recorded.
  • 1909-11-19 DW convey to Board
  • 1910-01-10 Board records.
  • 1910-12-16 Hughes writes his name on the 1906
    deed and records it.
  • 1910-12-21 O to DW deed is recorded.
  • When does Hughes become a purchaser? Why does
    this matter?

Petherbridge
13
Bd. of Ed. of. Minneapolis v. Hughes
Owner
DW (not recorded)
Board
Hughes
-What will Hughes find when he searches? -In a
notice jurisdiction? -In a race
jurisdiction? -Would a tract index be useful
here?
Petherbridge
14
Guillette v. Daly Dry Wall
  • Some Facts
  • Developer (2 recorded plans, no restrictions).
  • 1967-08 O conveys to W, deed restricts the use
    of Ws lot, but none of Os lots.
  • 1968-05 O conveys to Guillette, deed restricts
    the use of Guillettes lot and states the same
    restrictions are hereby imposed on the seller.
  • 1968-06 O convey to P, deed restricts Ps use,
    but not Os.
  • 1972-04 O conveys to Daly, no restrictions.
  • What are Ds plans for the lot?
  • What will D find when he searches his chain of
    title?
  • What does the SJC require of title searchers? Is
    it too much?

Petherbridge
15
END
Petherbridge
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com