Hadronic Form Factor Uncertainties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Hadronic Form Factor Uncertainties

Description:

... the strangeness radius and the strangeness magnetic ... However, uncertainty appears to depend on empirical form assumed for strangeness form factors. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: jeffm180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hadronic Form Factor Uncertainties


1
Hadronic Form Factor Uncertainties
  • J. Martin, U. Winnipeg
  • M. Pitt, Va Tech

2
Physics
  • The usual form factors GE?, GM? are known.
  • By measuring at very low Q2 and very forward
    angles, we attempt to isolate the first term,
    which to zeroth order in Q2 is just proportional
    to QWp
  • However, there are still corrections due to
    unknown terms
  • GEs, GMs, GAe
  • For example, at our experiments kinematics, the
    2nd and 3rd terms (only weakly dependent on QWp)
    contribute about 30. So, to measure QWp at the
    2 level, these must be controlled at 5 relative
    level.
  • Also there are EW rad cor we take these to be
    known.

3
Procedure to Estimate Uncertainties due to GEs,
GMs
  • Use asymmetry data from previous experiments.
  • Assume a reasonable empirical form for GEs, GMs
    with some unknown parameters (typically the
    strangeness radius and the strangeness magnetic
    moment).
  • Use fitting to determine the errors in those
    parameters.
  • Calculate the error induced on the asymmetry to
    be measured by the Qweak experiment and hence on
    the extraction of QWp.

4
Example the empirical model known as linear
  • P1?s P2?s
  • SAMPLE, HAPPEX, PVA4, G0FWD proton included.
  • Relative uncertainty on Qwp is
  • Result

5
Example the empirical model known as Galster
  • P1?s P2?s
  • SAMPLE, HAPPEX, PVA4, G0FWD proton included.
  • Relative uncertainty on Qwp is
  • Result

6
Additional studies
  • Tried eight different empirical forms, fitted
    over all data and over restricted Q2lt0.25 range.
  • Tried fixing ?s (motivated by Leinweber et al).
  • Tried three parameter fit
  • Include Qweak as just another experiment
  • Fit ?s, ?s, and QWp directly.
  • Advantage Unified description of QWp from all
    PV electron experiments.
  • Disadvantage statistical and systematic
    uncertainties of Qweak and all the other
    experiments are rolled into final answer for QWp.

7
Example three parameter fit with Galster
  • P1?s
  • P2?s
  • P3QWp
  • SAMPLE, HAPPEX, PVA4, G0FWD. and Qweak proton
    included.
  • TOTAL Relative uncertainty on Qwp is displayed on
    graph.
  • Result

fair agreement with other method
8
Results
9
For PAC Jeopardy
  • results of 2-par fit for linear (fit to all
    data) and super simple (fit to Q2lt0.25).
  • Although fit to all experiments, plot contains
    experiments which are at roughly the same beam
    energy (HAPPEX and G0).

10
Conclusions and Remaining Work
  • For two of the reasonable models considered, the
    answer is within the error envelope. These
    models are definitely justifiable.
  • However, uncertainty appears to depend on
    empirical form assumed for strangeness form
    factors.
  • Remaining to do
  • include more data G0BACK, PVA4 backward,
    deuterium, HAPPEX-He.
  • Q2 binning for Qweak.
  • effect of lowering average Q2 of Qweak.
  • Mark will now talk more about use of these
    results and axial piece.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com