The Origin of Life: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

The Origin of Life:

Description:

Edvard Munch. Many origins events can't be isolated. and studied in the lab ... However, Carsonella lives inside a leaf-munching insect, called a psyllid. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: apo79
Category:
Tags: life | munching | origin

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Origin of Life:


1
The Origin of Life Scientists Play at Dice
Carl Sagan
Oslo Student Conference 2008
2
What is Life ?
Life is far too important a thing ever to talk
seriously about. Oscar Wilde
Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
R. D. Laing
The supreme irony of life is that hardly anyone
gets out of it alive. Robert
Heinlein The Spirit of God has made me the
breath of the Almighty gives me life.
Job, ch. 33. Jesus answered, "I am the way and
the truth and the life.
St. John, ch. 14, vs. 6 Origin of Life
ideas ALL have philosophical and religious
implications!
Dance of Life Edvard Munch
Bristlecone Pine - White Mountains of California.
Reputed to be 4700 years old.
E. Coli can double in 9.8 min
3
Science Applied to Historical Events
  • Many origins events can't be isolated
  • and studied in the lab
  • Models depend critically on assumptions
  • and presuppositions often driven by
  • ideology
  • Origin of Life science is the softest of
  • soft science
  • Science has no right to supremacy in
  • this area
  • Its claims must be evaluated with great
  • caution alongside those of philosophy
  • and religion.

4
Origin of Life Science is the Softest of Soft
Science Science has no valid right to supremacy
in this area so its claims must be evaluated with
great caution alongside philosophical and
religious beliefs.
  •  
  • Richard Dawkins labels those who reject the
    molecules to man evolutionary scenario as
  • ignorant, stupid, insane (or wicked, but Id
    rather not consider that )
  • From a book review, New York Times, April 9,
    1987, p. 34.
  • Authoritarian statements like this seem
    particularly unwarranted.

Richard Dawkins Professor for the public
understanding of science at Oxford University
5
  • John C. Walton
  • B.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc.
  • Chartered Chemist
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • Research Professor of Chemistry
  • University of St. Andrews

University of St. Andrews School of Chemistry
Royal Society of Chemistry
6
  • Characteristics of Living Organisms
  • Organization Being composed of one or more
    cells, which are the basic units of life.
  • Metabolism Consumption of energy by converting
    nonliving material into cellular components and
    decomposing organic matter
  • Adaptation The ability to change over a period
    of time in response to the environment.
  • Response to Stimuli e.g. the contraction of a
    unicellular organism when touched, or motion for
    example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the
    sun, or an animal chasing its prey.
  • Reproduction The ability to produce new
    organisms. For example, reproduction can be the
    division of one cell to form two new cells.

cell division
X-Ray structure of Virus Viruses are not alive.
They cant reproduce themselves
Soil bacteria are alive. They fit the criteria.
7
  • Smallest Living Organisms
  • Carsonella ruddii was reported to be the smallest
    living cell having only about 160,000 base pairs
    of DNA in its genome. However, Carsonella lives
    inside a leaf-munching insect, called a psyllid.
    They have a symbiotic relationship. There are
    certain genes necessary for life that the
    bacteria's genome lacks, but these are
    compensated for by its insect host.
  • Mycoplasma genitalium is a small parasitic
    bacterium which lives in the genital and
    respiratory tracts of primates. M. genitalium
    is the smallest known free-living bacterium and
    has a genome consisting of approximately 580,000
    base pairs

Carsonella ruddii
Psyllid on leaf
M. Genitalium
Genome of M. Genitalium
8
  • Anatomy of a Cell

Lysosome
Cytoplasm
Nucleolus
Vacuole
Centriole
Nucleus
Mitochondria
Ribosomes
Cell membrane
Rough endoplasmic reticulum
Golgi apparatus
Cytoskeleton
Smooth endoplasmic reticulum
9
  • Ribosome Structure

Large ribosome subunit
10
  • Cell Membrane Structure

11
  • Four Types of Large Molecules are Key Cell
    Components

12
  • Proteins and Enzymes are Large Polypeptides

Pentapeptide
Amino acids
Fluorinase from bacterium Streptomyces cattleya
Insulin contains 51 amino acids
13
Structure of RNA
14
  • Importance of the Sequence Order of Amino Acids
  • in Enzymes and of Nucleotides in RNA and DNA
  • Amino acids are linked in a particular order in a
    protein chain.
  • The protein folds into a specific shape which is
    determined by the order of the amino acids.
  • It is the exact shape which enables the protein
    to perform a specific task in the cell catalyse
  • a reaction or transformation, signal, be a
    structural unit, etc.
  • In all living cells the order of amino acids in
    a protein corresponds to the order of a series
  • of nucleotides in the genetic DNA.
  • Proteins and nucleic acids are related to each
    other by the genetic code.
  • The DNA carries the information to build all the
    proteins in the cell.

15
  • Importance of the Sequence Order of Amino Acids
  • in Enzymes and of Nucleotides in RNA and DNA

Genetic DNA
  • The nucleotide sequences are read off by the
    biological translation machinery and
  • transported to the site of protein
    synthesis. At this site the sequence is
    recognised and
  • the corresponding sequence of amino acids
    is assembled into the protein chain.
  • This requires gt 100 enzymes.
  • Cells contain several thousand proteins.
  • When a cell divides a copy of the genetic DNA,
    which contains all this information,
  • is passed on to the daughter cell, and so
    is preserved from generation to generation.

16
  • Information and the First Living Organism
  • For The first living organism there would be
    no DNA with the right
  • information to copy, and no enzyme-based
    cell translation machinery.
  • Where did the vast amount of information
    needed to build an organism
  • capable of reproduction come from in the
    first place?
  • Which came first, the proteins or the nucleic
    acids? This has been much
  • debated. Many, including Nobel
    prize-winner Manfred Eigen, have
  • concluded that both would have to be
    present together.
  • Recently the idea that RNA came first the
    so-called RNA world - has
  • become fashionable.
  • Assume a "primordial soup" containing amino
    acids and nucleotides.
  • How could just the "right" sequence of
    nucleotides (or amino acids) have
  • appeared ?

17
Random Coupling of Nucleotides to Form RNA and
DNA
nucleotides
18
Random Coupling of the Four Types of Nucleotides
to Form DNA or RNA
NB Total number of atoms in known universe
1080
Hubert P. Yockey,. A calculation of the
probability of spontaneous biogenesis by
information theory. Journal of Theoretical
Biology, 1977, 67, 377-398. Hubert P. Yockey,
Self-organization origin of life scenarios and
information theory. Journal of Theoretical
Biology,1981, 91, 13-31.
19
Magnitude of the Odds Against Random Formation of
A Biologically Useful DNA (or RNA) sequence
  • It necessarily follows that the chance of a
    meaningful DNA sequence being obtained
  • spontaneously is almost infinitesimally small.

20
Random Coupling of Amino Acids to Form Proteins
21
Random Coupling of Amino Acids to Form Proteins
Chance of the right protein (100 aa long)
forming is 1 in 10130 Number of atoms in entire
known universe is 1080 Chance of winning
national lottery 1 in 109
22
The Origin of Life Design or Evolution?
or
William Blake
Oslo Student Conference 2008
23
Potential Solutions to the Random Coupling
Problem
  • There might be laws of chemical affinity which
    ensure amino acids and/or nucleotides
  • actually do not couple at random but are
    pre-disposed to produce useful products.
  • Many lab experiments have shown this is NOT so
    aas and nucleotides can couple in ANY order
    (some constraints). Coupling would be random in
    an origin of life scenario.
  • Given enough time anything can happen!
  • Time is in fact the hero of the plot.
    The time which we have to deal with is of the
    order of two billion years. What we regard as
    impossible on the basis of human experience is
    meaningless here. Given enough time, the
    impossible becomes possible, the possible
    probable and the probable virtually certain. One
    has only to wait time itself performs the
    miracles
    George Wald


Carl Sagan
24
Potential Solutions to the Random Coupling
Problem
Chance of the right protein (100 aa long)
forming is 1 in 10130 Chance of winning national
lottery 1 in 109
The improbability involved in generating even
one bacterium is so large that it reduces all
considerations of time and space to nothingness.
Given such odds, the time until the black holes
evaporate, and the space to the ends of the
universe, would make no difference at all. We
would be waiting for a miracle.




Robert Shapiro.

25
Is There Enough Time to Solve the Random Coupling
Problem ?
If you took the entire universe and
converted it to computer chips forget the
monkeys- each one weighing a millionth of a gram
and had each computer chip able to spin out 488
trials at, say, a million times a second
producing random letters, the number of trials
you would get since the beginning of time would
be 1090 trials .. You will never get a
sonnet by chance. The universe would have to be
10600 times larger. Yet the world just thinks
monkeys can do it every time.
Anthony Flew There is a God

The only reasonable conclusion is that there
isnt enough space, there isnt enough matter
(particularly carbon), and there isnt enough
time, for spontaneous formation of a
self-replicating system.
26
Potential Solutions to the Random Coupling
Problem
  • 3. Perhaps some selection mechanism was at
    work?
  • (a) Note that Darwinian evolution in which
    natural selection operates on variants
  • generated by random mutations CANNOT occur
    before self-replicating entities
  • were available.
  • (b) Computational models of selection.
    Dawkins Weasel
  • program. Algorithm reaches desired phrase
    in 43
  • generations.
  • Note However
  • The algorithm must know the target phrase
    (protein or RNA sequence) to compare
  • its guesses with! But it is this
    sequence that was supposed to be discovered in
    the
  • first place. The computer assumes what
    it sets out to discover circular reasoning!
  • The algorithm compares random sequences with
    the target then "selects" and


27
Do Not Laboratory Preparations of RNA Sequences
Show That Nature Can Solve the Random Coupling
Problem?
  • We know that in the laboratory scientists can
    make RNA sequences or AA sequences almost to
    order. Doesnt this show that there is really
    no problem? If it can be done in the lab surely
    Nature can do it too!
  • However
  • In the lab. the scientist already knows the
    right sequence to make! It has been copied from
    a living organism. This approach again assumes
    what origin of life research sets out to find.
  • A huge amount of design has to go into these
    lab. experiments. It is design stemming from
    human intelligence.
  • The chance of spontaneous formation of useful
    RNA or proteins is almost
  • infinitesimally small.
  • Lab. Experiments with intelligent design input
    can make self-replicating
  • systems.
  • Conclusion This provides strong evidence
    that Intelligent Design emanating
  • from a Mind must have been at work in the
    origin of life.


28
Miller-Urey Experiment
  • By passing electrical sparks through mixtures
    of hydrogen, methane, ammonia, and water vapor,
    scientists produced amino acids, the building
    blocks of organic life. The experiment was first
    performed by Stanley Miller in 1953 and has now
    been repeated many times elsewhere.
  • Many subsequent experiments showed
  • there must be NO oxygen present
  • The gas mixtures gave almost zero
  • amino acids unless they were
  • reducing.


29
Was There Really NO Oxygen in the Earths
Original Atmosphere?
  • Oxygen is the MOST ABUNDANT element in the
    earths crust.
  • Oxygen is overwhelmingly abundant in the
    hydrosphere combined as
  • water.
  • The atmosphere closely interacts with the
    lithosphere and hydrosphere
  • could it really be devoid of oxygen?


30
Was the Earths Original Atmosphere Devoid of
Oxygen?
  • The presence of the large ocean effectively
    guarantees significant oxygen in the atmosphere
    because UV photolysis of H2O in the upper
    atmosphere releases oxygen.
  • Direct observations from the moon during the
    Apollo 16 mission revealed that substantial
    amounts of hydrogen were leaving the earths
    atmosphere due to photochemical water
    dissociation.

Earth from the Apollo 16 spacecraft

31
Was there no oxygen in the earths original
atmosphere?
  • Jupiter's moons Europa and Ganymede have surface
    water in the form of ice and both are known to
    have atmospheres containing oxygen.
  • Recently, it was found that the rings of Saturn,
    which are largely composed of ice, also have
    their own oxygen atmosphere.
  • It seems far more likely that the earth's
    atmosphere has always contained a substantial
    amount of oxygen.


Callisto, Ganymede and Europa
32
Was there no oxygen in the earths original
atmosphere ? Geological evidence
  • 1 Reduced forms of iron in Precambrian rocks,
    such as the banded iron formations, show the
    early atmosphere was reducing?
  • But! Deeper waters in oceans and lakes
    are often oxygen free. Many geologists consider
    these formations simply reflect that they were
    laid down under deep waters.
  • Precambrian sedimentary and igneous rocks are
    lithologically rather similar to younger rocks.
    Same kinds of minerals. Same chemical
    compositions.
  • Weathering depends critically on the atmosphere
    and produces clays. These are just as abundant
    in Precambrian as in later rocks. Erosion and
    sedimentation resemble modern processes.
  • Kerogen (graphitized carbonaceous matter) is
    present in Precambrian rocks. The amount
    decreases with rock age contrary to expectation
  • if there were a prebiotic soup

Australian Banded Iron formation

Clay
Kerogen
33
Fossil Evidence of Precambrian life
  • Conclusions
  • Life present on earth
  • from the earliest
  • Precambrian.
  • Not much time available
  • for abiotic origin of life.


Modern stromatolites at Shark Bay Australia
Satellite image of Isua Supergroup Greenland
34
Raw Materials for RNA-World?

35
Production of Nucleotides by Random Coupling

36
Conclusions
  • Statistically, the chance of forming even one
    useful RNA sequence can be shown
  • to be essentially zero in the lifetime of the
    earth.
  • The complexity of the first self-replicating
    system, and the information needed to
  • build it, imply intelligent design.
  • Hope of beating the colossal odds against
    random formation of replicating RNA is
  • based on ideology rather than science.
  • As lab experiments on model replicators become
    more complex they demonstrate
  • the need for input from intelligent mind(s).
  • Acceptance of an early earth atmosphere free of
    oxygen strains belief beyond
  • breaking point!
  • No chemically or geologically plausible routes
    to nucleotides or RNA strands have
  • been developed.


37
  •  Why are there not more professional scientists
    who are openly sceptical of evolutionary
    scenarios?
  • Most biologists work in institutions dedicated to
    evolution and its sister disciplines. Many
    institutes are named Evolutionary Biology or
    some variant of this.
  • The research funding, the livelihoods, the
    careers, the professional reputations of all
    these scientists depend on adherence to
    evolutionary orthodoxy.
  • Authoritarian control of personnel and
    publications.
  • E.g. Richard Sternberg case (USA), Michael Reiss
    case (UK).
  • 3. Strongly held ideological convictions
    philosophical naturalism, atheist materialism.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com