Kontraktsrett II Utvalgte emner 2002 H Kai Krger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Kontraktsrett II Utvalgte emner 2002 H Kai Krger

Description:

Internasjonale kontraktsforhold n r h rer saken under norsk jurisdiksjon? Internasjonale kontraktsforhold hvilket lands rett skal anvendes p tvisten? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: jpr79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kontraktsrett II Utvalgte emner 2002 H Kai Krger


1
Kontraktsrett II Utvalgte emner 2002 HKai
Krüger
  • Emne 6
  • Norsk og nordisk kontraktsrett under global og
    europeisk belastning trender og scenarier

(se også www.jur.uib.no Ansatte Krüger)
2
Problemmeny
  • Internasjonale kontraktsforhold når hører saken
    under norsk jurisdiksjon?
  • Internasjonale kontraktsforhold hvilket lands
    rett skal anvendes på tvisten?
  • Virkeområde for norsk preseptorisk
    forbrukervern-lovgivning?
  • Overnasjonale føringer på innholdet i norsk
    kontraktslovgivning nå og i nær fremtid?
  • Rettsmetode når kontrakten har internasjonalt
    preg?

3
Om interlegal anvendelse av norsk
kontraktsrettslovgivning
  • Interlegalt lovvalg (IP)
  • Løsørekjøp lov 3.4.1964 nr 1, 3
    (partsautonomi) og 4 (deklaratorisk regel om
    selgerlandets lov)
  • Preseptoriske virkeområderegler, f eks fkl 3
    annet ledd, finansavtl 3
  • Irma Mignon-formelen Rt. 1923.II.58
    (notatsiden!)
  • EU Rom-konvensjon om lovvalg i kontraktsforhold
    er ikke en del av EØS acquis
  • Jurisdiksjon
  • Tvistemålslovens Kap 2 anvendbar både nasjonalt
    og for avgjørelsen av verneting ved internasj
    kontrakter, særlig bopelsverneting 18
  • Lugano 1992 om
  • jurisdiksjon,
  • anerkjennelse og
  • fullbyrdelse i EU/EØS-området (fri flyt for
    dommer)
  • Særhensyn EØS ved grenseoverskridende
    markedsføring

4
Kjl 88 (CISG Art 7)
  • Tradisjonell norsk rettsmetode
  • Preseptorisk lov
  • Kontrakt
  • Deklaratorisk lov
  • Utfyllende løsninger i nasj domspraksis,
    kontraktspraksis
  • Reelle hensyn
  • CISG Art 7 anvisning
  • Kontrakt (CISG Art 6)
  • Internasjonal orientering ved konv tolkningen
  • Nasjonal rett
  • (CISG gjelder ikke forbrukervern)

5
ANNET INTERNASJONALT RETTSSTOFF
  • Overnasjonale EØS-føringer forbruker/næring
  • Internasjonale Handelskammers (ICC)
    pakkeløsninger
  • Kjøpsklausulene Incoterms 2000 (norsk utgave
    2001) (EXW, FCA, FAS, FOB, CFR, CIF osv)
  • Andre ICC klausuler og pakkeløsninger, f eks
    Force Majeure Hardship Documentary Credits,
    Arbitration, International Code of Direct
    Selling
  • Kontraktsspesifikke konvensjoner på sjø- og
    transportrettens område (stykkgods/container)
  • Lex mercatoria-prosjektene, særlig Principles
    of European Contract Law I-II-III, men også
    UNIDROIT 1994
  • Andre- FIDIC (konsulenttjenester) ORGALIME
    (mekanisk industri)

6
Aktuelle EØS-føringer - aktuelle og ventede
  • Gjeldende Forbrukerdirektivene (oversikt med
    implementering i Tekstsamling)
  • Gjeldende Offentlige anskaffelser
    (prosedyreregler), handelsagentur,
    grenseoverskridende betaling
  • Pipeline Betalingsforsinkelse i kommersielle
    forhold Dir 2000/35
  • Policy notat Om kontraktsretten i EU generelt
    COM(2001)398 final

7
Nærmere om Kommisjonens Green Paper 2001
COM(2001)398
  • Hva er et Green Paper i EØS-sammenheng?
    (Grønnbok)
  • Om hovedinnholdet i COM(2001)398
  • Kommisjonens spørreskjema - alternativene
  • I No EC action
  • II Promote the development of common contract
    law principles leading to more convergence
    of national laws
  • III Improve quality of legislation already in
    place
  • IV Adopt new comprehensive legislation at EC
    level

8
HøringsnotatEEA EFTA Comments 2001-10-15
--- 6. CONCLUSION To achieve adequate consumer
protection and at the same time ensuring equal
competitive conditions, the EEA EFTA States find
that a combination of option II and option III
willbe the most effective tool. This approach
will hopefully provide adequate solution in the
short run as well as facilitate a more rapid
gravitation towards harmonisation of
Europeancontract law within a reasonable
time. VEDL
9
(Com) Summary to the responsesReactions to the
Communication on Contract Law (2002)
--- 5. NEXT STEPS The Commission has not yet
drawn its conclusions. It intends to present its
observations and recommendations, if appropriate
in the form of a Green or White Paper, by the end
of 2002. In this document the Commission
intends to identify areas in which the
diversity of national legislation in the field of
contract law may undermine the proper functioning
of the internal market and the uniform
application of Community law to describe in more
detail the option(s) for action in the area of
contract law which have the Commission's
preference in the light of the results of the
consultation. In this context, the improvement of
existing EC legislation will be pursued and the
Commission intends to honour the requests to put
forward legislative proposals to consolidate
existing EC law in a number of areas to
develop an action plan for the chronological
implementation of the Commission's policy
conclusions. 22
10
Et relevant lex mercatoria prosjekt Principles
of European Contract Law 1995-2002 (PECL)
  • Om Restatement konseptet
  • PECL I-II-III
  • Status generelt ved EØS grenseoverskridende
    kontrakter
  • Status i forhold til f eks kjl 88
  • Status ved internasjonal voldgift (ICC)
  • Status i fortsettelsen av Kommisjonens 2001
    Grønnbok?

11
I fortsettelsen
  • Noen PECL utplukk

12
Article 1.101 - Application of the
Principles (1) These Principles are intended to
be applied as general rules of contract law in
the European Communities. Sml CISG 1980 Art 1,
kjl 1 (2) These Principles will apply when the
parties have agreed to incorporate them into
their contract or that their contract is to be
governed by them. Sml kjl 1, 1964 IP kj lov
3, jfr vedr forbrukerkjøp CISG Art 2a, kjl
4 (3) These Principles may be applied when the
parties (a) have agreed that their contract is
to be governed by "general principles of law",
the "lex mercatoria" or the like Sml 1964 IP
kjl 3, tvml 452 or (b) have not chosen any
system or rules of law to govern their
contract. Sml CISG Art 7 og kjl 88 (4) These
Principles may provide a solution to the issue
raised where the system or rules of law
applicable do not do so.

13
Article 1.103 - Mandatory Law (1) Where the
otherwise applicable law so allows, the parties
may choose to have their contract governed by the
Principles, with the effect that national
mandatory rules are not applicable. Sml CISG
1980 Art 6, avtl 36 (anvendelig på
IP-klausuler?) (2) Effect should nevertheless be
given to those mandatory rules of national,
supranational and international law which,
according to the relevant rules of private
international law, are applicable irrespective of
the law governing the contract. Sml f eks CISG
Art 12, pantel 1-2, deknl 7-3 annet ledd
14
Article 1.201 (ex art. 1.106) - Good Faith and
Fair Dealing (1) Each party must act in
accordance with good faith and fair
dealing. (2) The parties may not exclude or
limit this duty. Sml avtl 33 og 36, EØS Art
54, konkurranselov 3-10, mfl 1
15
Article 1.202 (ex art. 1.107) - Duty to
Co-operate Each party owes to the other a duty
to co-operate in order to give full effect to the
contract. Rt. 1935.122 (Falconbridge),
Rt. 1951.371 NV (Kull og Vedbolag), ND 1985.234
NV (Mascot), ND 1990.204 (Ula) Ikke-lovfested
e prinsipper om lojalitet og samarbeid?
16
Article 1.301 (ex art. 1.105) - Meaning of
Terms --- --- --- (6) 'Written' statements
include communications made by telegram, telex,
telefax and electronic mail and other means of
communication capable of providing a readable
record of the statement on both sides Sml CISG
Art 13, EF Dir 99/93, fkl 37
17
Article 1.302 (ex art. 1.108) -
Reasonableness Under these Principles
reasonableness is to be judged by what persons
acting in good faith and in the same situation as
the parties would consider to be reasonable. In
particular, in assessing what is reasonable the
nature and purpose of the contract, the
circumstances of the case, and the usages and
practices of the trades or professions involved
should be taken into account. Sml avtl 36
annet ledd
18
Article 2.101 (ex art. 5.101) - Conditions for
the Conclusion of a Contract (1) A contract is
concluded if (a) the parties intend to be
legally bound, and Sml domspraksis dispositivt
utsagn (b) they reach a sufficient
agreement without any further
requirement. Sml domspraksis oppnådd
enighet (2) A contract need not be concluded or
evidenced in writing nor is it subject to any
other requirement as to form. The contract may
beproved by any means, including witnesses. Sml
norsk hovedregel om formfrihet bevisbyrde ved
tvist om fakta
19
Article 2.104 (ex art. 5.103 A) - Terms not
individually negotiated (1) Contract terms which
have not been individually negotiated may be
invoked against a party who did not know of them
only if the party invoking them took reasonable
steps to bring them to the other party's
attention before or when the contract was
concluded. Sml domspraksis vedtagelse av
standardvilkår i næringsforhold - f eks NS 3430
sammenholdt med NS 3410 (2) Terms are not
brought appropriately to a party's attention by a
mere reference to them in a contract document,
even if that party signs the document. Strengere
enn norsk rettspraksis? Jfr f eks pantel 3-17
(2)
20
Article 2.105 (ex art. 5.106 A) - Merger
Clause (1) If a written contract contains an
individually negotiated clause stating that the
writing embodies all the terms of the contract
(amerger clause), any prior statements,
undertakings or agreements which are not embodied
in the writing do not form part of the
contract. Sml f eks Skip 1999 Art XVIII, NTK 2000
Art 2 (2) If the merger clause is not
individually negotiated it will only establish a
presumption that the parties intended that their
prior statements, undertakings or agreements were
not to form part of the contract. This rule may
not be excluded or restricted. NL 5-1-2 (3) The
parties' prior statements may be used to
interpret the contract. This rule may not be
excluded or restricted except by an individually
negotiated clause. Anti parole evidence
estoppel (common law) (4) A party may by its
statements or conduct be precluded from asserting
a merger clause to the extent that the other
party has reasonably relied on them.
21
Article 2.201 - Offer (1) A proposal amounts to
an offer if (a) it is intended to result in a
contract if the other party accepts it, and (b)
it contains sufficiently definite terms to form a
contract. Sml norske sedvanerettslige vilkår for
dispositivt utsagn? (2) An offer may be made
to one or more specific persons or to the
public. Sml avtl 7 - rom for adressatløse
utsagn i norsk rett? (3) A proposal to supply
goods or services at stated prices made by a
professional supplier in a public advertisement
or a catalogue, or bya display of goods, is
presumed to be an offer to sell or supply at that
price until the stock of goods, or the supplier's
capacity to supply the service, is exhausted.
UfR 1985.877 DaHR, NM utredning 2000 vedrørende
bindende reklameutsagn, videre integrasjonsregler
av typen kjl 18
22
Article 2.202 - Revocation of an Offer (1) An
offer may be revoked if the revocation reaches
the offeree before it has dispatched its
acceptance or, in cases of acceptance by conduct,
before the contract has been concluded under
Article 2.205(2) or (3). Sml CISG Art 16 (ikke
norsk rett), avtl 7, jfr 39 (2) An offer made
to the public can be revoked by the same means as
were used to make the offer. CISG Art 14 (2)
(3) However, a revocation of an offer is
ineffective if (a) the offer indicates that it
is irrevocable or (b) it states a fixed time
for its acceptance or (c) it was reasonable
for the offeree to rely on the offer as being
irrevocable and the offeree has acted in reliance
on the offer. Sml avtl 7, 39 (re integra)
23
Article 2.301 (ex art. 5.301) - Negotiations
Contrary to Good Faith (1) A party is free to
negotiate and is not liable for failure to reach
an agreement. Før avtaleslutning ikke
ansvar (2) However, a party who has negotiated or
broken off negotiations contrary to good faith
and fair dealing is liable for the losses caused
to the other party. Sedvanerett om
prekontraktuelt erst ansvar (negativ
kontraktsinteresse)(jfr skl 2-1), lovfestede
EØS/nasjonale regler om ansvar ved uriktig
anbudsbehandling - offentlige v/t kontrakter
(norsk lovreform 1999) (3) It is contrary to
good faith and fair dealing, in particular, for a
party to enter into or continue negotiations with
no real intention of reaching an agreement with
the other party. Avtl 1, intensjonsavtaler
(letters of intent) m v
24
  • Article 3.102 - Categories of Representation
    (1) Where an agent acts in the name of a
    principal, the rules on direct representation
    apply (Section 2). It is irrelevant whether the
    principal's identity is revealed at the time the
    agent acts or is to be revealed later.
  • (2) Where an intermediary acts on instructions
    and on behalf of, but not in the name of, a
    principal, or where the third party neither knows
    nor has reason to know that the intermediary acts
    as an agent, the rules on indirect representation
    apply (Section 3).
  • Sml synliggjøring av fullmakt som vilkår for
    fullmaktsvirkninger
  • fullmektig ikke part, men kompetanserisiko
    etter avt 25
  • fullmaktsgiver avtalepart (stillingsf, skriftlig
    f 18)

25
Article 3.203 - Unidentified Principal If an
agent enters into a contract in the name of a
principal whose identity is to be revealed later,
but fails to reveal that identity within
areasonable time after a request by the third
party, the agent itself is bound by the
contract. Sml avtl 25, Rt. 1980.1109
(Fekete)
26
Article 4.110 -Unfair terms which have not been
individually negotiated (1) A party may avoid a
term which has not been individually negotiated
if, contrary to the requirements of good faith
and fair dealing, it causes a significant
imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations
arising under the contract to the detriment of
that party, taking into account the nature of the
performance to be rendered under the contract,
all the other terms of the contract and the
circumstances at the time the contract was
concluded. (2) This Article does not apply
to (a) a term which defines the main subject
matter of the contract, provided the term is in
plain and intelligible language or to (b) the
adequacy in value of one party's obligations
compared to the value of the obligations of the
other party. Sml avtl 36, mfl 9a, EØS Art
54, konkl 3-10
27
Article 4.111 (ex art. 6.111) - Third persons
(sml for (1) og (2) norsk kjl 84
subrogasjonskonsept. Jfr 86) (1) Where a third
person for whose acts a party is responsible, or
who with a party's assent is involved in the
making of a contract (a) causes a mistake by
giving information, or knows of or ought to have
known of a mistake, (b) gives incorrect
information, (c) commits fraud, (d) makes a
threat, or (e) takes excessive benefit or
unfair advantage, remedies under this Chapter
will be available under the same conditions as if
the behaviour or knowledge had been that of the
party itself. (2) Where any other third
person (a) gives incorrect information, (b)
commits fraud, (c) makes a threat, or (d)
takes excessive benefit or unfair advantage,
remedies under this Chapter will be available if
the party knew or ought to have known of the
relevant facts, or at the time of avoidance ithas
not acted in reliance on the contract.
28
Article 6.111 (ex art. 2.117) - Change of
Circumstances (1) A party is bound to fulfil
its obligations even if performance has become
more onerous, whether because the cost of
performance has increased or because the value of
the performance it receives has diminished.
(pacta sunt servanda) (2) If, however,
performance of the contract becomes excessively
onerous because of a change of circumstances, the
parties are bound to enter into negotiations with
a view to adapting the contract or terminating
it, provided that (sml kjl 23/ 27, ICC, CISG
Art 79, force majeure-standardklausuler) (a)
the change of circumstances occurred after the
time of conclusion of the contract, (b) the
possibility of a change of circumstances was not
one which could reasonably have been taken into
account at the time ofconclusion of the contract,
and (c) the risk of the change of circumstances
is not one which, according to the contract, the
party affected should be required to bear. (3)
If the parties fail to reach agreement within a
reasonable period, the court may (avtl 36, jfr
kjl 88 og sedvanerett vedr irregulær
utvikling/bristende forutsetninger) (a)
terminate the contract at a date and on terms to
be determined by the court or (b) adapt the
contract in order to distribute between the
parties in a just and equitable manner the losses
and gains resulting from thechange of
circumstances. In either case, the court may
award damages for the loss suffered through a
party refusing to negotiate or breaking off
negotiations contrary to good faith and fair deal
29
Article 8.108 - Excuse Due to an Impediment (1)
A party's non-performance is excused if it proves
that it is due to an impediment beyond its
control and that it could not reasonably have
been expected to take the impediment into account
at the time of the conclusion of the contract, or
to have avoided or overcome the impediment or its
consequences. (2) Where the impediment is only
temporary the excuse provided by this article has
effect for the period during which the impediment
exists. However, if the delay amounts to a
fundamental non-performance, the obligee may
treat it as such (3) The non-performing party
must ensure that notice of the impediment and of
its effect on its ability to perform is received
by the other party within a reasonable time after
the non-performing party knew or ought to have
known of these circumstances. The other party
isentitled to damages for any loss resulting from
the non-receipt of such notice. CISG Art 79 (jfr
Art 7), kjl 27 (jfr 40), kjl 28, kjl 88,
fristutsettelse etter NS 3430 pkt 17 (jfr i
forbrukerforhold boligoppfl 11)
30
Article 9.501 - Right to Damages (1) The
aggrieved party is entitled to damages for loss
caused by the other party's non-performance which
is not excused under Article 8.108. (impediment)
(2) The loss for which damages are recoverable
includes (a) non-pecuniary loss and (b)
future loss which is reasonably likely to
occur. Sml kjl 67 (1) og (2), kjl 70 (3)
31
Article 9.502 - General Measure of Damages The
general measure of damages is such sum as will
put the aggrieved party as nearly as possible
into the position in which it would have been if
the contract had been duly performed. Such
damages cover the loss which the aggrieved party
has suffered and the gain of which it has been
deprived. Article 9.503 - Foreseeability The
non-performing party is liable only for loss
which it foresaw or could reasonably have
foreseen at the time of conclusion of the
contract as a likely result of its
non-performance, unless the non-performance was
intentional or grossly negligent. CISG Art 74,
sml generelt norsk kjl 67, jfr 70 )(1) og (2)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com