Rip currents or undertow in the surf zone? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Rip currents or undertow in the surf zone?

Description:

Rip currents or undertow in the surf zone? Niels Vinther and Troels Aagaard ... When currents in the trough exceed 1 m/s, undertow is initiated and vice versa ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: institute70
Category:
Tags: currents | rip | surf | undertow | zone

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rip currents or undertow in the surf zone?


1
Rip currents or undertow in the surf zone?
Annual CoastView-meeting, Bologna, March 2004
  • Niels Vinther and Troels Aagaard
  • Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen,
    Denmark

2
Rip currents or undertow
Longshore bar
Rip head
Longshore bar
Feeder channels
Rip head
From the web.
3
This project
  • Based on data from four existing field
    experiments Skallingen 1995, 2000, 2002 and
    Egmond 2002
  • Field experiments include measurements of current
    velocities/directions, sediment concentrations,
    wave heights/periods and morphological surveys.
  • The final aim of this study is to set up a
    general model based on hydrodynamic and
    morphological parameters to distinct between 2D
    and 3D circulation patterns in the surf zone.

4
Skallingen
TR1.5 m (1.3 and 1.7) Hmean0.5 m D50160-200 ß
0.007 (nearshore zone), 0.02-0.03 (intertidal
zone).
After Aagaard et al., 1995
5
Egmond
TR1.65 (1.4 and 2.1) Hmean 1.3 m D50 250-300
µm ß 0.02-0.03 (nearshore zone) and 0.1-0.02
(intertidal zone)
After Kroon et al., 2003
6
Bore-model to predict mass transport across
longshore bar

  • C(gh)0.5
  • B00.1
  • A0.9H2
  • Hrmswave height
  • hdepth
  • Twaveperiod

Svendsen, 1984
7
Skallingen 1995
8
Skallingen 2002
9
Egmond 2002
10
Mass transport versus trough area/dist to rip
Skallingen 1995
11
Mass transport versus trough area/dist to rip
Skallingen 2002
12
Mass transport versus trough area/dist to rip
Egmond 2002
?
13
Mass transport versus trough area/dist to rip for
all data sets
Mistake? Or is it the damning point of using the
model globally?
14
Zoom in on mass transport versus trough area/dist
to rip
Slope of separation line 1 (m/s)
15
Some questions
  • Is it a globally applicable model?
  • How can we improve the model?
  • How can we get the required data
  • Can the model be integrated in the Argus
    routines?

16
Some answers
  • We need more data - preferably from other field
    sites.
  • More 3D data (cell circulation).
  • From Argus-images we can get trough area, level
    of bar crest and distances to rips
  • From off-shore buoys we can get wave
    heights/period and water levels

17
Conclusions
  • Surf zone circulation is depended not only on
    hydrodynamics but also on surf zone bar
    morphology
  • When currents in the trough exceed 1 m/s,
    undertow is initiated and vice versa
  • Deviations at Egmond, may turn down the model as
    a global model
  • The model may be integrated in the Argus-routines

18
Thank you!
19
(No Transcript)
20
Extra slides
21
Skallingen field site
22
Egmond field site
23
Instrumentation
Current velocity/direction Wave heights Wave
periods Morphology
24
Calculation of trough areas
SK1995
25
Skallingen 2000
26
Mass transport versus trough area/dist to rip
Skallingen 2000
No positive data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com