HIVLipodystrophy: Guidelines Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

HIVLipodystrophy: Guidelines Development

Description:

Are lipodystrophy and metabolic disorders a single syndrome or ... Previous studies had documented avascular necrosis of the femoral head. May be asymptomatic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: DDra7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HIVLipodystrophy: Guidelines Development


1
(No Transcript)
2
HIV-LipodystrophyGuidelines Development
  • Donald Kotler, MD
  • Professor of Medicine
  • Columbia University College of Physicians and
    Surgeons
  • St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center
  • New York, NY

3
HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy
Hyperlipidemia
Insulin resistance
Fat atrophy
Fat accumulation
4
Lipodystrophy
  • Are lipodystrophy and metabolic disorders a
    single syndrome or multiple, overlapping
    syndromes?
  • Are these conditions caused by ART, host factors,
    HIV disease, or a combination of factors?

5
Guidelines Rationale
  • Response to need for cost effective approach to
    diagnosis and management
  • Clinical and public health (epidemiologic) needs
  • Guidelines will need periodic revision

6
Aims Guidelines
  • Glucose metabolism
  • Lipid metabolism
  • Body composition
  • Cardiovascular risk
  • Lactic acidemia
  • Osteopenia

7
Glucose Metabolism
  • Pre-HAART data
  • Phenotype
  • Effect of PI in healthy volunteers
  • Effects of fat accumulation
  • Effects of fat depletion
  • Recommendations
  • Future directions

8
Fasting Glucose vs OGTT
FastingIntolerance
Fasting Diabetes
2-hour Intolerance
2-hour Diabetes
?110, lt126
?126
?140, lt200
?200
1 (3)
0
9 (30)
0
Engelson. 13th IAC 2000 Durban. Abstract
ThPpB 1437.
9
Effect of Indinavir Upon Glucose Metabolism
  • Design prospective, open-label
  • Patients 10 healthy volunteers
  • Treatment IDV 800 mg TID x 1 mo
  • Measurements insulin resistance, lipids, body
    composition
  • Findings insulin resistance rose while lipids
    and body composition did not change

Noor. 2nd Workshop on Lipodystrophy.
10
VAT and Insulin Sensitivity
10
r .050P lt.0001
8
6
Insulin Sensitivity(10-4 - min-1/(?U-1 mL)
4
2
0
0
100
150
200
250
300
50
VAT (cm2)
11
Lipoatrophy and Insulin Resistance
  • Design prospective, cross-sectional
  • Subjects 15 HIV with LD, 14 HIV without LD,
    12 controls
  • Measurements insulin resistance, body
    composition, soluble TNF receptors
  • Findings insulin resistance was reduced more in
    muscle than in fat, and was associated with
    lipoatrophy and increased sTNFR2 levels

Mynarcik. JAIDS 200025312.
12
ConsensusInsulin Resistance
  • Clinical
  • Fasting glucose
  • Investigational
  • Fasting insulin
  • C-peptide
  • HOMA
  • Oral glucose tolerance test
  • HgbA1C (diabetes only)

13
Metformin in HIV-Lipodystrophy
  • Randomized, controlled trial
  • Metformin at 500 mg BID
  • Treatment associated with decreased insulin AUC
    during OGTT (P .01)
  • Treatment associated with weight loss(P .005),
    decreased blood pressure(P .009)
  • Trend towards decreased VAT
  • Metformin decreased TPA and PAI-1

Hadigan. JAMA 2000284472.
14
Rosiglitazone in Lipodystrophy
  • Insulin resistance is common
  • Insulin resistance is drug-related
  • Insulin resistance precedes fat redistribution
  • Insulin resistance is related to microvascular
    disease in other circumstances
  • Thiazolidinediones decrease insulin resistance

15
Fat Metabolism
  • Pre-HAART data
  • Phenotype
  • Effect of PI in healthy volunteers
  • Effects of other ARVs
  • Genetic susceptibilities
  • Recommendations

16
Fat MetabolismPre-HAART Data
  • Elevated fasting triglycerides
  • Association with elevated de novo synthesis
  • Associated with decreased clearance
  • Association with serum alpha interferon
  • Decreased HDL, LDL, VLDL chol, and apo B
  • Increased prevalence of LDL-B
  • Apoprotein E2 associated with higher
    triglycerides
  • Triglycerides fell with AZT therapy

17
Effect of RTVUpon Serum Lipids
  • Design double-blind, placebo-controlled
  • Patients 21 healthy volunteers
  • Treatment RTV for 2 weeks
  • Findings RTV treatment led to rises in
    triglycerides, VLDL chol, LDL chol, apo B, and Lp
    (a)

Purnell. AIDS 20001451.
18
Evaluation Dyslipidemia
  • Fasting lipid profile
  • ?8 hr, preferably gt12 hr
  • TGs, total and HDL chol, calculated LDL
  • Calculated LDL is inaccurate if TGs gt400
  • Evaluate prior to therapy
  • Repeat 3 to 6 months
  • Repeat 1 to 2 months if baseline TGs are elevated
  • Screen for other risk factors

Adult ACTG Cardiovascular Disease Focus Group,
5/25/00.
19
NCEP GuidelinesTreatment Initiation
Treatment Decisions Based on LDL-Cholesterol
Level
  • Initiation Level LDL GoalPatient
    Category (mg/dL) (mg/dL)
  • Dietary Therapy
  • Without CHD and lt2 risk factors ?160 lt160
  • Without CHD and ? 2 risk factors ?130 lt130
  • With CHD gt100 ?100 Drug Treatment
  • Without CHD and lt2 risk factors ?190 lt160
  • Without CHD and ? 2 risk factors gt130 ?100

LDL low-density lipoprotein CHD, coronary
heart disease.
20
Treatment of Hyperlipidemia
  • Potential for drug-drug interactions between
    statins/fibrates and antvirals
  • Atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin,
    benzafibrate, ciprofibrate, fenofibrate, and
    gemfibrozil are metabolized primarily by CYP3A4
  • Cerivastatin and fluvastatin are metabolized by
    CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, respectively
  • Pravastatin is not primarily metabolized by
    CYP isoenzymes

21
Body Fat Redistribution
  • Definitions
  • Prevalence
  • Associations
  • Measurements
  • Recommendations
  • Future directions

22
Body Fat Distribution
  • Refers to the 3-dimensional localization of
    adipose tissue depots within the body
  • Various depots affect metabolism differently
  • Compartment size affected by many factors
  • Health consequences
  • Associations with hyperlipidemia, insulin
    resistance, atherosclerosis
  • Association with absolute, not relative,fat
    contents

23
Prevalence of Fat Redistribution
Prevalence Estimate
Reference
n/N

Method(s)
Boix et al 1998
5/272
2
SR/CR
Shaw et al 1998
12/961
13
PE
Dong et al 1999
21/116
18
SR/PE
Veny et al 1998
35/158
22
PE
Lichtenstein et al 2000
529/1077
49
CR
Miller et al 2000
723/1350
51
SR/PE
Carr et al 1998
74/116
64
SR/PE
Carr et al 1999
95/113
84
SR/PE
Prevalence estimates are for combined
lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy. Abbreviations
SR self-report PE physical examination CR
chart review. Boix. 12th World AIDS Congress,
1998. Abstract 12398. Shaw. J STD AIDS
19989595-599. Dong.J Acquir Immune Def Syndr
Hum Retrovirol 199921107-113. Veny. 38th
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents
and Chemotherapy 1998. Abstract I-92.
Lichtenstein. 7th Congress on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections 2000. Abstract 23.
Carr. AIDS 199812F51-F58. Carr. Lancet
19993532093-2099.
24
Regional Measurements
  • Cross-sectional imaging
  • CT, MRI
  • Whole body and single slice
  • Regional DXA
  • Anthropometry
  • Regional BIA
  • Ultrasound

25
Abdominal MRI Scans
VAT
VAT
SAT
SAT
Control Subject
Increased VAT
26
DXA and Fat Distribution
  • Most appendicular fat is SAT
  • Change in appendicular fat change in SAT
  • Trunk fat is comprised of SAT and VAT
  • Mild improvement over anthropometrics in non-HIV
    conditions
  • Comparison to anthropometrics in HIV infection
    not reported

27
Changes in Trunk Fat vs VAT
8
y 0.4564x 0.2556R2 0.7153
6
4
2
Change in VAT (Liters)
0
10
8
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2
4
6
8
Change in Trunk Fat (kg)
28
Difference vs Average of Predicted and Measured
VAT
3
2
Mean 2SD 1.57
1
Difference Between Measured andPredicted VAT
(Liters)
Mean 0.058
0
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
1
Mean 2SD 1.43
2
3
Average of Measured and Predicted VAT (Liters)
29
Changes in Limb Fat vs SAT
10
y 1.7514x 0.13R2 0.6978
8
6
4
2
Change in SAT (Liters)
0
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
2
4
6
8
10
Change in Limb Fat (kg)
30
Difference vs Average ofPredicted and Measured
SAT
4
Mean 2SD 3.17
3
2
1
Difference Between Measured andPredicted SAT
(Liters)
Mean 0.016
0
10
8
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1
2
Mean 2SD 3.0
3
4
Average of measured and predicted SAT (liters)
31
Waist vs Hip (Male Controls)
1600
y 0.8577x 166.09R2 0.8086
1400
1200
1000
WC (mm)
800
600
400
200
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
CIC (mm)
32
Clinical Significance


Coronary arterydisease
0.938 0.051
0.925 0.054
CVA
0.958 0.051
0.925 0.054
All cause deaths
0.935 0.053
0.925 0.053
Larsson. BMJ 1984.
33
Anthropometric Analyses
  • WHR predicts adverse consequences in
    epidemiologic studies
  • WHR lacks sensitivity and specificity compared to
    CT or MRI, also in HIV
  • Waist circumference and sagittal diameter are
    better predictors of VAT by single-slice CT in
    non-HIV
  • Multivariate techniques

34
Discriminant Function vsVAT by MRI
45
40
35
Female No Lipo
DF
Female Lipo
30
25
20
0
5
10
VAT vol (L)
DF 0.043WC-0.70WHR
35
Evaluation Visceral Fat
  • Clinical
  • Waist circumference
  • Investigational
  • Single-cut CT
  • Single-cut MRI
  • DEXA
  • Ultrasound
  • BIA (not useful)

36
Effect of Discontinuing d4T
  • 9-month follow-up
  • Increased SAT
  • No change in VAT
  • Results imply that lipoatrophy is reversible

Saint-Marc. 7th CROI 2000 San Francisco.
Abstract 52.
37
LipodystrophyEffect of Exercise
  • Design prospective, open label
  • 10 men with truncal obesity
  • 16-week exercise program
  • Results significant decrease in total body and
    truncal fat, no significant change in weight,
    lean mass, or bone density nor adverse effects

Roubenoff. AIDS 1999131373.
38
Week
Baseline
12
24
36
48
60
8
6
4
VAT (Liters)
2
0
rhGH dose
6 mg
2 mg
0
39
Risk Benefit Analysis ofCAD and HAART
Average calculated increase in CHD events 0.14
per year
? Mortality rates in HIV-infected patients by 50
in the US
Risks
Benefits
CHD coronary heart disease. Adapted from
Grunfeld. 6th CROI 1999 Chicago. Palella.
NEJM 1998338853.
40
Evaluation Cardiovascular Risk
  • Clinical
  • Classic risk factors
  • Investigational
  • Carotid doppler
  • Stress echo
  • Noninvasive coronary artery assessment
  • Novel metabolic parameters

41
Lactic Acidosis
  • Liver dysfunction as opposed to lipodystrophy
  • Non-specific symptoms, may be fatal
  • Reversal with cessation of NRTI therapy
  • Mild elevations are common
  • Utility of screening lactate is questionable
  • 5 mmol/L with symptoms or 10 mmol/L, irrespective
    of symptoms, is significant
  • Need care in sample collection
  • Routine monitoring not recommended

42
Osteopenia/Osteonecrosis
  • Previous studies had documented avascular
    necrosis of the femoral head
  • May be asymptomatic
  • Studies show demineralization in a range that may
    become clinically significant
  • Not likely related to PI therapy
  • NRTI therapy may affect bone mineral
  • Routine screening is not recommended

43
(No Transcript)
44
For more HIV-related resources, please visit
www.hivguidelines.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com