Le SueurHenderson Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Le SueurHenderson Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments Results

Description:

Strand Challenges are: Compare/Contrast, ... Weak Proficiency at Hilltop, 35% IEP w/reading ... Strong proficiency at Park and Hilltop, first class to have ADEDK ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: billbjo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Le SueurHenderson Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments Results


1
Le Sueur-HendersonMinnesota Comprehensive
Assessments Results
  • Presentation to the
  • Board of Education
  • June 7, 2004

2
Third Grade Reading
3
LEVELS I, II, III, IV, V 3rd Reading
4
LEVELS I, II, III, IV , V3rd Reading
5
3rd Grade Reading Levels
6
3rd Grade Reading Observations
  • Strand Strengths are Lit. Passages, Info.
    Passages
  • Strand Challenges are Compare/Contrast, Analysis
  • Hispanic subgroup demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • LEP subgroup demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Sp. Ed. Subgroups demonstrated relative strength
    in strand scores
  • F/R Subgroups demonstrated relative strength in
    strand scores
  • Trend line shows growth in scale scores
  • Trend line shows movement from lower to higher
    achievement levels
  • Strong proficiency at Park , first class to have
    ADEDK
  • Weak Proficiency at Hilltop, 35 IEP w/reading
  • Level I students tend to be students with IEPs
    and English language learners
  • Students in level II a have a greater chance of
    moving to a higher level with the help of
    existing interventions

7
Third Grade Math
8
LEVEL I,II, III, IV, V3rd Math
9
LEVEL I,II, III, IV,V3rd Math
10
3rd Grade Math Levels
11
3rd Grade Math Observations
  • All Strand show strengths of proficiency
  • Hispanic subgroup demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • LEP subgroup demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Sp. Ed. Subgroups demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • F/R Subgroups demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Trend line shows growth in scale scores
  • Steep trend line shows movement from lower to
    higher achievement levels
  • Strong proficiency at Park and Hilltop, first
    class to have ADEDK
  • Proficiency levels are very strong compared to
    the state average
  • 2nd year of new math curriculum

12
Fifth Grade Reading
13
Levels I,II, III,IV,V5th Reading
14
Levels I,II, III,IV,V5th Reading
15
5th Grade Reading Levels
16
5th Grade Reading Observations
  • All Strand show strengths of proficiency
  • Analysis strand shows an area to be looked at
  • Hispanic subgroup demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • LEP subgroup demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Sp. Ed. Subgroup demonstrated relative strong
    strand scores
  • F/R Subgroup demonstrated relative strong strand
    scores
  • Migrant subgroup demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • Trend line shows steady growth in scale scores
  • Current proficiency scores are at or above state
    average
  • Six year trend sees a movement of students from
    lower proficiency(I/II ) levels to higher
    proficiency levels (III/IV/V)
  • Level I students tend to be students with IEPs
    and English language learners

17
Fifth Grade Math
18
Levels I,II a, II b, III, IV5th Math
19
Levels I,II,III, IV, V5th Math
20
5TH Grade Math Levels
21
5th Grade Math Observations
  • All Strand show strengths of proficiency
  • Analysis strand shows an area to be looked at
  • Hispanic subgroup demonstrated relative strong
    strand scores
  • LEP subgroup demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Sp. Ed. Subgroup demonstrated relative strong
    strand scores
  • F/R Subgroup demonstrated strong strand scores
  • Migrant subgroup demonstrated strong strand
    scores
  • Trend line shows growth in scale scores
  • Proficiency is at or above AYP requirement
  • Trend is movement of students from lower
    proficiency(I/II ) levels to higher proficiency
    levels (II/III/IV/V) with a significant increase
    in levels III IV in 2002 2003

22
Fifth Grade Writing-Descriptive
23
Fifth Grade Writing-Narrative
24
Fifth Grade Writing-Problem Solving
25
Fifth Grade Writing-Clarification
26
Seventh Grade Reading
27
Levels I,II, III,IV,V7th Reading
28
7th Grade Reading Levels
29
Seventh Grade Math
30
Levels I,II a, II b, III, IV7th Math
31
7TH Grade Math Levels
32
Conclusions
  • We continue to move students from lower
    proficiency levels to higher proficiency levels
  • This movement coincides with implementing
    interventions such as LEAP, Jump Start, and using
    achievement data to target students for success
  • Our interventions have the greatest impact on
    students who are slightly below grade level
    targets
  • Beginning to target strategies at students at
    risk of not meeting proficiency standard (ESL,
    Sp.Ed., Ethnicity).
  • There is a significant impact of ADEDK at Park
    this year as demonstrated by 3rd grade scores
  • In general, our curriculum continues to meet the
    needs of a majority of our k-6 students, however
    we still need to provide support to students who
    have the unique learning needs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com