The Human Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

The Human Sciences

Description:

'I am more interested in how a man lives than how a star dies' ... very poor, poor, mediocre, above average, excellent. 1 Million Dollars (Above Averages) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: ssd4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Human Sciences


1
The Human Sciences
  • (Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology,
    Economics)

2
Quotes-Choose the one that is the most
interesting to you and briefly explain why.
  • I am more interested in how a man lives than how
    a star dies-(Sherwin Nuland).
  • The only possible conclusion the social sciences
    can draw is some do, some dont-(Ernest
    Rutherford).
  • In carefully controlled laboratory conditions
    animals do whatever they damn well please-(The
    Harvard Law of Animal Behavior).
  • Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to
    look at the word itself MANKIND. Basically, it
    is made of two separate words-MANK and IND
    What do these words mean? Its a mystery, and
    thats why so is mankind-(Jack Handy).

3
Why the separate category of Science?
  • Human Sciences are an attempt to reduce the
    mystery by studying human behavior-(257).
  • Include Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology,
    Economics
  • Why the different classification when, according
    to the theory of evolution, we are natural
    animals too-composed of over 99 of the same
    genes as apes and are composed of almost exactly
    the same basic ingredients-63Hyrdrogen, 25.5
    Oxygen, 9.5 Carbon, 1.5 Nitrogen, 0.5 other
    trace elements.
  • If so, why cant we just use Science then if we
    are so similar? What makes Human different from
    Animals?
  • Why are Humans so difficult to study?

4
Why not use the Scientific Method on the study of
Human Beings?
  • Soul? Language? Free Will? Creativity?
    Consciousness?
  • Mirror Test
  • Observation
  • Possible problems when applied to humans?
  • Survey Question-Rank yourself in terms of your
    ability to get along with others
  • very poor, poor, mediocre, above average,
    excellent
  • 1 Million Dollars (Above Averages)

5
Observation continued
  • Complete Survey on pg. 259
  • Loaded Questions
  • Create 2 Abortion Surveys One Pro Choice
    one Pro-Abortion
  • Observer Effect
  • Ways around it?
  • Are they Reality shows?
  • Habituation or Going Native? Hidden Cameras
    (Ethical?)
  • Self Fulfilling Prophecies?

6
Experiments-Problems with Observation
  • Psychology-2 random groups of kids, one labeled
    bright or advanced one labeled less bright.
    Outcome?
  • Questions-Box 1 pg. 263
  • Economics- Bear vs. Bull Markets
  • Questions-Box 2 pg. 263
  • Anthropology-Aborigine Tribe voodoo- A spell is
    cast and the individual invariably sickens and
    almost always dies-(Anthropologist Wade Davis
    263). WHY?
  • Box pg. 264-Question 2
  • Psychological Reactance-So Dont do your homework!

7
Scientific Method Applied to Human Sciences
continued-Measurement
  • Can you accurately measure human beings?
  • How many thoughts have you had today? Last hour?
    Last minute? Feelings? Urges? of times you
    have been nice? Mean? Good? Bad?
  • Stream of Consciousness
  • Behaviourism
  • Question Box pg. 265
  • Example-Who won the Centennial Olympics? (-Pg.
    265-266) Boxes 267

8
Experiments
  • Are experiments as important in Human Sciences as
    Natural Sciences?
  • Three Problems-
  • 1. Trying to make sense of complex situations
    where it is impossible to run a controlled
    experiment.
  • 2. The artificial design of experiments often
    distorts the behavior of the participants
  • 3. Ethical boundaries that cannot be crossed, or
    if crossed, have a negative impact on the
    participants.
  • So, what to do?

9
The Way it Should be
  • Wait for nature to provide appropriate
    opportunities-i.e. brain damage, separated twins,
    etc.
  • Devise inventive experiments-How do babies see
    the world? (Box 268)
  • The Milgram Experiment-
  • Shocking! (box 269)
  • How awesome would that be?!!!!
  • 2/3 of volunteers continued to administer shocks
  • If paired with other teachers who refused, only
    10 continued. Unethical Experiment? Why?
    Ethical? Why?

10
Scientific Method continued-Laws
  • Role of science is to develop Theories
  • and Laws to explain the phenomena that is
    being studied. So if human possess HUMAN FREE
    WILL, can laws about human behavior be formed?
  • Newton Quote
  • Then why are human so predictable?
  • 2nd Box 270
  • Can accurate statistical predictions be made
    about large numbers?
  • Law of Large Numbers
  • How is the entire concept of
  • Insurance predicated on this law?
  • Are Probalistic laws inferior to Universal ones?

11
Trends Laws
  • Despite Law of Large Numbers, Human Sciences have
    a poor record of prediction. Why?
  • Example-1973 Paul Ehrlich predicted 65 million
    Americans would be starving due to
    economic/environmental factors in 1990 in fact
    that is the exact number of Americans considered
    overweight that year and it has grown. 'We Are
    Running Out of Environment'
  • Population expert Paul Ehrlich says we must see
    the links in our planet's ills

12
Trend vs. Law cont
  • Often, scientists discover Trends-(studies that
    shows the direction in which a variable is
    moving, but gives very little or no information
    as to why it is moving, thereby making it
    unreliable)
  • Just because the Seahawks have lost 3 in a row,
    that gives NO indication that they will beat the
    Jacksonville Jaguars on Sunday.
  • Phillips Curve
  • Causation vs. Correlation Post Hoc Ergo Propter
    Hoc
  • Bouchards TV, GPA, IQ example
  • Box 272

13
Complexity of Real World Situations
  • Man crashes his car on a simple two lane street.
    He was unhurt, car is a write off, so insurance
    company wants to investigate Cause of accident.
  • Factors include 1. It was a very windy road at
    2. nighttime with 3. some ice. 4. The man was 4.
    speeding, had 5. drunk four pints of Guinness,
    was 6. a racecar driver used to driving fast, and
    7. had been fiddling with his cell phone at the
    time
  • What caused the crash?

14
Hard vs. Soft Sciences
  • If you cant determine that, then how are we
    supposed to be able to determine the cause of
    teenage angst, inflation, the recession, or the
    rise of crime in a certain city?
  • Is it possible to make If ______, then ______
    statements utilizing Human Sciences?
  • If so, then are the labels Hard Sciences and
    Soft Sciences accurate? Fair?
  • IS IT REALLY TRUE that in the Human Sciences the
    only conclusion that can be drawn is Some Do,
    Some Dont-Earnest Rutherford (1871-1934).

15
Reductionism vs. Holism
  • Is there are hierarchy of sciences? What would
    be the order?
  • Reductionism
  • Reductive Fallacy-H20Wet stuff? Sodium Frickin
    ChlorineMost prevalently INGESTED food additive
    in the world?
  • Holism
  • Are you creating the culture around you or is the
    culture around shaping you?

16
Verstehen Position
  • Martians trying to understand stoplights
  • Not just observe physical movements, but also how
    they see the situation
  • Box 277
  • Meaning vs. Mechanism
  • Are the human sciences more prone to BIAS?
    Confirmation Bias? Use Falsifcationism?
  • Who is the best judge of a childs character? A
    friend, parent, teacher, a therapist, or a person
    watching from afar that is not known?

17
Predictions
  • Human Sciences are less successful than Natural
    Sciences at making predictions.
  • 1. Human Sciences generally deal with complex
    real, real world situations with uncontrollable
    variables.
  • 2. Some predictions are valuable, not because
    they are accurate, but because they produce
    incentive for change. Our economy right now for
    example.
  • 3. Is the purpose of Human Sciences to explain
    and predict or to try to describe and understand?

18
Summary of Problems using Scientific Method in
the Human Sciences
  • Observation-
  • 1. Cant observe human mind
  • 2. Surveys can/are misleading and biased
  • 3. Observing people affects the way they behave
  • Measurement-
  • 4. Social phenomena are difficult to quantify and
    measure
  • Hypothesis-
  • 5. The act of predicting can affect predicted
    behavior

19
Cont
  • Experiments
  • 6. Human Science is the study of humans in
    complex real world situations
  • 7. Limited by ethical/moral boundaries
  • Laws
  • 8. Not good at predictions
  • 9. Usually uncover Trends not laws
  • 10. Human Sci is probabilistic in nature

20
Human Sciences Conclusion
  • Human Sciences probably not as flawed/bad as
    critics believe nor is it the panacea for
    humanity.
  • Yet, is it VALUABLE? Do we learn from it?
  • And it leads to some great BIG Questions.
  • How is the mind related to the body? Will
    machines think? Could a mind exist independent
    of a body? Do we truly have Free Will?

21
Free Will vs. Determinism
  • Free Will is obvious right?
  • Determinism
  • Nature vs. Nurture Debate within Determinism
    Camp-Still NO FREE WILL
  • Box 289 LaPlace Quote
  • Does Determinism oppose Free Will? How?
  • First, Free Will does not mean you are free to do
    WHATEVER you want (i.e. I want to be an NBA Balla
    Balla ShotCalla, but Im short) Limited by
    Nature Enviornment
  • However Free-Willer says that I had options

22
Fatalism vs. Determinism
  • Determinist does not say that the future is
    determined irrespective of what you do. That is
    Fatalism.
  • Fatalismyour destiny is written by the stars
    and there is nothing YOU can do to change the
    future.
  • If you belief that what you do DOES affect your
    future, than Fatalism is false.
  • Determinism steers between Fatalism and Free Will.

23
Choices
  • You could
  • 1. Reject the claim that every event has a cause
    and argue for Free Will
  • 2. Accept Determinism, but still adamantly insist
    that Free Will is compatible with it
  • 3. Accept Determinism and conclude that Free Will
    is a human illusion no matter how unappealing
    this may be.

24
Choice 1-Does Every Event have a Cause
  • Cancer, a car wreck, down syndrome, a Seahawk
    losing streak, the universes existence
  • Example-A light goes out-Do you need a cause
  • Everything needs an empirical cause that can be
    verified, right?
  • This is very attractive why? Does Science exists
    without this belief?
  • Subatomic Randomness Heisenbergs Uncertainty
    Principle
  • So, actually all events governed by chance?
  • Is this irrelevant to Free Will? Is Free Will the
    same as Random Will?

25
Choice 2
  • A believer in Free Will might claim that no
    matter what physics says, I WILL NOT be bullied
    into denying the plain facts of my existence. I
    am free and my experience proves it! Nanny
    Nanny!
  • Ok-Give an example of a free will choice and
    lets back-map it and prove it freeness.
  • Did you consciously shower, eat, sleep, potty,
    wake up, drive, and think this morning totally on
    your own volition? Or was it initiation of Plan
    A known as morning routine?
  • How did you choose breakfast this morning?

26
What is a Choice?
  • Scene-Lunch today Choice-delicious cheeseburger
    or scrumptious pizza. What happens at the
    precise moment of decision?
  • Vs.
    Vs.
  • Box 292
  • Choice Harvard-(you are admitted, no
    scholarships only 40,000 a year in loans vs. UW
    ½ scholarship so you only need a loan for 10,000
    a year. How do you decide? Is one a destiny?

27
Choice 3-Human Free Will is an Illusion
  • Just because you feel free,
  • Doesnt mean you are.
  • Baruch Spinoza (1632-77) stated that men think
    themselves free because they are conscious of
    their actions, but ignorant of their causes. If
    falling stones were conscious, they would
    probably believe that they were falling of their
    own free will. Perhaps we are simply puppets
    unaware of the strings of physical causation that
    are pulling us.


28
So, can they be compatible? Lets be friends!
  • Compatibilism
  • I do what the frick I want, so I
  • am Free Yo! but the determinist will argue that
    you were only free to an extent than had been
    determined by all the events and factors leading
    up to that choice. So, they coexist in that way
  • Box 294-Case of a dog
  • What if I want to smoke crack, but I also dont
    want to? Which is Free Will?

29
Controlling of desires Choice vs. Addiction
  • Differentiate between ordinary choice and
    addiction?
  • Compatibilism says that you are free when you do
    what you desire, but if your desires are beyond
    your control than are you free?
  • Box 295
  • My Favorite Question Could you have done
    otherwise?
  • I love chocolate covered Nutter Butters
  • I often eat the whole bag in one sitting.

30
Favorite Question Cont
  • Free Will- Yes Fattypants, you could have if you
    had shown more willpower.
  • Determinism- If you were given that same choice
    100 times at that same moment with the same
    factors, you would always eat them Fattypants.
    (i.e. given the kind of person you are combined
    with the environment that surrounded you at the
    time, you HAD NO CHOICE!)
  • Fatalism-...You were destined to be a Fattypants
  • So, Free Will Determinism not compatible
    because you were not actually Free to do what
    you wanted?
  • Box 299

31
If Free Will is an illusion than
  • Does that mean there is no such things as moral
    responsibility or accountability?
  • Affect Ethics how? Good people cannot help being
    good, bad people cant help being bad.
  • Empty the jails then right?
  • Determinist would say No, we still
  • Need to 1. protect society, 2 modify future
  • Behavior like dogs with rabies
  • Retribution Theory vs. Reform Theory
  • One consistent with determinism, one not?

32
Questions
  • Questions in box on 298
  • So which is better Reform Theory of Punishment or
    Retribution Theory?
  • Does Determinism make Rationalism obsolete?
  • Rationalism is? Then?
  • So if you believe this to be true then you cannot
    rationally believe it to be true (or false for
    that matter) because in a deterministic world you
    cannot Rationally believe anything.
  • Box 299

33
Conclusion?
  • Religious Factors-
  • All Knowing God
  • YOU DECIDE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com