Efficiency in induction motors and variable speed drives: not an easy problem - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Efficiency in induction motors and variable speed drives: not an easy problem

Description:

Induction motors use more than 50% of total electricity in industrialised countries ... Requires measurement of torque and rpm, yielding Pout ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:342
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: research82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Efficiency in induction motors and variable speed drives: not an easy problem


1
Efficiency in induction motors and variable speed
drives not an easy problem
  • P. Van Roy, B. Slaets, R. Belmans, Katholieke
    Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

2
Overview
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Efficiency standards
  • 3. Measurement set-up
  • 4. Experimental results - Motors
  • 5. Efficiency at partial load
  • 6. Energy savings
  • 7. Experimental results - Drives
  • 8. Conclusions

3
1. Introduction
  • Induction motors use more than 50 of total
    electricity in industrialised countries
  • Already high efficiency, can still be improved
  • Different efficiency standards give different
    results
  • Comparison between motors requires reliable
    standard
  • With converters no standards yet

4
2. Efficiency standards
  • Grid-connected motors
  • Europe IEC 60034-2, and the new
  • IEC 61972
  • US IEEE 112 - Method B
  • Japan JEC 37
  • Difference in efficiency value up to 3
  • Why such a difference?

5
2. Efficiency standards
  • The loss consists of five components
  • Stator copper losses Pstator
  • Iron losses PFe
  • Rotor copper losses Protor
  • Friction and windage losses Pfr,w
  • Stray load losses Padditional
  • PFe and Pfr,w from no-load test
  • Pstator and Protor from R, s and Pin
  • Padditional can not be measured directly

6
2. Efficiency standards
  • Best method of determining Padditionalcalculate
    Padditional for various load levels as
  • Linearise and correct for measurement errors in
    function of torque squared as

7
2. Efficiency standards
8
2. Efficiency standards
  • IEEE 112 method B uses this method
  • Requires measurement of torque and rpm, yielding
    Pout
  • Torque measurement was historically difficult,
    but is now perfectly possible
  • JEC 37 assumes Padditional 0
  • IEC 60034-2 Padditional 0.5 . Pin
  • IEC 61972 Padditional by measurement or fixed
    amount depending on motor rating

9
3. Measurement set-up
10
3. Measurement set-up
  • Accuracy
  • Standard deviation, based on
  • measurement equipment 0.9
  • Pstray correction factor B 0.17
  • 5 measurements of one motor 0.12
  • Comparison 4 identical motors with consecutive
    serial numbers 0.24
  • Careful with small efficiency differences!

11
4. Experimental results - Motor
  • 18 motors, 11 kW, 55 kW and 75 kW
  • Stray load losses at full load
  • Average value 1.7 of Pin

12
4. Experimental results - Motor
  • Differences between catalogue efficiency value
    and measured values
  • Conclusions
  • Catalogue values are not reliable
  • Only IEEE standard is meaningful

13
4. Experimental results - Motor
  • Comparison IEC - IEEE

6
11 kW
55 kW
75 kW
5
4
D Eff
3
2
1
0
IEC
IEEE
IEC
IEEE
IEC
IEEE
14
4. Experimental results - Motor
15
4. Experimental results - Motor
16
4. Experimental results - Motor
17
4. Experimental results - Motor
18
5. Efficiency at partial load
  • Motors are usually overdimensioned
  • Efficiency at 50 and 75 load should also be
    mentionned
  • Definition average weighted efficiency
  • (1 x Eff100 0.75 x Eff75 0.5 x Eff50)/2.25 or
  • (0.75 x Eff100 1 x Eff75 0.5 x Eff50)/2.25

19
5. Efficiency at partial load
20
6. Energy savings
  • Assume 11 kW motor 1 and 2
  • Typical purchase cost 37.5 EUR/kW
  • Energy cost 0.075 EUR/kWh
  • Annual time of use e.g. 5000 h at
  • Partial load 75
  • Efficiency motor 1 88 motor 2 86
  • Energy saving /- 1100 kWh/year
  • Cost saving /- 80 EUR/year /- 20 of
    purchase cost

21
6. Energy savings
22
6. Energy savings
23
6. Energy savings
  • Conclusions
  • Annual cost savings can be as high as 50 of the
    typical purchase cost
  • More efficient motor can be more expensive, but
    pays itself back
  • Efficiency at partial load is very important
  • Overdimensioned motor choice
  • Use at partial load
  • Need for reliable standard (IEEE, new IEC)

24
7. Experimental results - Drive
  • Variable speed drive, using induction motor and
    frequency converter
  • Energy saving potential up to 50 in
  • pump drives
  • ventilator drives
  • compressor drives
  • when compared with fixed speed on/off,
    throttle or bypass system
  • What with efficiency between drives?

25
7. Experimental results - Drive
  • Converter efficiency 95 to 98, even at low load
  • Motor efficiency comparable with grid-connected
    efficiency, even higher at low load when using
    flux-optimisation
  • Overall drive efficiency at 50 Hz 2 lower
    compared with grid-connected motor
  • Difference in drive efficiency 3 to 4
  • Advice efficient motor with user-friendly
    converter, with flux-optimisation

26
7. Experimental results - Drive
Load torque n2
27
7. Experimental results - Drive
Load torque n2
28
7. Experimental results - Drive
Load torque n2
29
7. Experimental results - Drive
Load fixed freq 50 Hz
30
8. Conclusions
  • IEC 34.2 is not reliable
  • Catalogue value usually too high, 3 to 4
  • Partial load efficiency is important as well
  • Fixed allowance for additional load losses can
    not be defended
  • More efficient motor energy and cost savings, as
    high as 60 of purchase cost
  • Variable speed drive energy saving 50
  • NEED FOR RELIABLE STANDARD AND
  • RELIABLE MANUFACTURER INFORMATION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com