Traditional culturebased methods are generally considered to be insufficient to describe microbial c - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Traditional culturebased methods are generally considered to be insufficient to describe microbial c

Description:

Traditional culture-based methods are ... These gel bands can be cloned for further analysis. The cloned gel fragments from DGGE can be further analyzed. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: computi214
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Traditional culturebased methods are generally considered to be insufficient to describe microbial c


1
  • Traditional culture-based methods are generally
    considered to be insufficient to describe
    microbial communities.
  • Not all microbes can be readily cultured
  • Not all culturable microbes have selectable media
    (can be hard to ID all microbes).
  • Time-consuming
  • Alternative molecule-based methods exist.

2
Two DNA strands melt when heat or chemical
denaturant is applied. This temp is influenced
by 1) H-bonds (GC metls at higher temp than
AT) 2) Attraction between neighboring bases of
the same strand DGGE exploits that DNA molecules
differing by only 1 NT within a low melting
domain will have diff melting temps, and that the
mobility of these molecules is retarded when DNA
strand dissociate.
3
DGGE Preliminary Preparation
  • DGGE usually performed on PCR products, hence
    primers must be carefully chosen so the region to
    be screened has one or at most two melting
    domains.
  • A GC clamp (40 NT long GC sequence added to one
    PCR primer) is usually positioned adjacent to the
    highest melting domain. Thus need full sequence
    data.
  • To determine concentration of denaturant to use,
    can do a gradient analysis (next slide).

4
Can analyze multiple products on same gel.
5
Once you establish denaturant concentration, can
do gels containing just that amount of
denaturant. Allows analysis of different samples
on different gel lanes.
6
(No Transcript)
7
Microbial ecology of oil spill bioremediation
  • Removal of hydrocarbons from oil spills doesnt
    occur as rapidly as desired because crude oil is
    high in hydrocarbons but low in nitrogen and
    phosphorous, which are required for
    microorganisms to convert hydrocarbons into
    biomass (which is rich in N and P).
  • Hydrocarbon degradation by indigenous microbes
    can be stimulated by adding N and P.
  • There is some evidence that controlling the level
    of nutrients may result in different patterns of
    hydrocarbon degradation, most likely, due to
    selection of different microbes.
  • This hypothesis can be tested.

8
DGGE was used to follow broad scale changes in
the bacterial communities selected during HC
degradation. DGGE analysis of bacterial 16S
rRNA gene fragments from oil contaminated beach
sediments undergoing bioremediation, shows
succession of bacterial communities in response
to nutrient addition These gel bands can be
cloned for further analysis.
9
The cloned gel fragments from DGGE can be further
analyzed. One method of analysis is ARDRA
(amplifieid rDNA restriction analysis. Amplify
16S rRNA-gene ? restriction digestions ? run
products on gel).
Results indicated Alcanivorax spp. May be
important contributors to hydrocarbon-degradation
in oil-impacted marine ecosystems. What do you
do with this information? Develop strategies to
select for this bacteria in the field.
10
Thermophilic treatment of high-strength
wastewaters
  • One potential alternative to treating wastewater
    via the activated sludge process or anaerobic
    treatment is autothermal thermophilic aerobic
    biological treatment which uses the exogenous
    energy released during microbial pollutant
    metabolism to heat engineered reactor systems to
    temps ranging from 45-65oC.
  • Benefits to this system include
  • Rapid biodegradation rates ? smaller reactor
    sizes
  • Low growth yields ? reduced residual biomass
    disposal costs
  • Current status is analysis of microbial
    communities supported by these reactors using
    DGGE of 16S rRNA

11
(No Transcript)
12
Experiment
  • Compare mixed microbial communities from
    thermophilic aerobic biological treatment
    reactors with analogous biological aeration
    basins operated at a lower temperature.
  • Step 1 Extract total genomic DNA using a
    commercially available kit (BIO 101)
  • Step 2 Amplify partial 16S rRNA sequences
    specific for the domain Bacteria using the
    polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • Step 3 Separate amplified sequences on the
    basis of GC content using a polyacrylamide gel
    containing gradually varying levels of denaturant
    (urea).

13
Result Have thermophilic cultures (left)
distinct from mesophilic cultures
(right) treating the same waste. Note each band
is cosidered likely to represent a
different organism. Conclusion Thermophilic
aerobic biological treatment reactors support
completely different cultures than similar
mesophilic reactors
14
DGGE pros and cons
  • Advantages
  • High detection rate and sensitivity
  • Simple methodology and non-radioactive
  • PCR fragments can be gel isolated
  • Disadvantages
  • Preliminary expts required
  • Specialized equipment
  • More expensive primers ( GC clamp)
  • Not good for high GC genes

15
t (terminal) - RFLP
  • In tRFLP the target gene is amplified from the
    community using standard PCR techniques with a 5'
    fluorescently tagged primer. The amplification
    products are digested with a restriction
    endonuclease and run on an automated sequencer.
    Because only the restriction fragment proximal to
    the labeled primer carries the flourescine, only
    this fragment is detected by the automated
    system. In general, each population of the
    community contributes a terminal fragment of one
    size.

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com