Overrepresentation of Children of Color in The Child Welfare System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Overrepresentation of Children of Color in The Child Welfare System

Description:

Racial Disproportionality: a situation when the percentage of children of color ... are less likely to be reunited with their parents; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: judyhar8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overrepresentation of Children of Color in The Child Welfare System


1
Overrepresentation of Children of Color in The
Child Welfare System
  • Judy A. Hartsfield
  • Presiding Judge
  • Family Court-Juvenile Division
  • Detroit, MI

2
Overview
  • Define Problem
  • Importance of Problem
  • Recommendations for Change

3
Define the Problem What We Know
  • Overrepresentation refers to both
  • racial disproportionality and
  • racial disparity.

4
Definition
  • Racial Disproportionality a situation when the
    percentage of children of color in the child
    welfare system does not reflect their share of
    the total population.

5
Definition
  • Racial Disparity are defined as a situation when
    the rate of disproportionality of one
    racial/ethnic group exceeds that of a comparison
    group.

6
Why is This Important?
  • African American and other ethnic children are
    more likely to be under State supervision, and
    once there, they generally fare worse than other
    children.

7
Why is This Important?
  • Although there is no evidence that they are
    abused or neglected more than other children,
    children of color are more likely to be pulled
    into Michigans child protection system, and to
    be placed in out-of-home care.

8
Why is This Important?
  • Overrepresentation in the protective services
    system helps feed disparities in the juvenile
    justice system.
  • Pronounced disparities in the states child
    welfare system have repercussionsboth human and
    fiscalthroughout the state and nation and must
    be addressed.
  • Aging out of foster care

9
Why is This Important?
  • Children in Foster Care in Michigan by Race
    (2003)
  • Total Children Foster Care
  • Number Percent Number Percent
  • White 1,832,802 72.1 7,444 38.8
  • Afr. Amer 445,734 17.5
    10,223 53.2
  • Am Ind/Alskn Nat. 14,770 0.6 194
    1.0
  • Asian 54,094 2.1 78 0.4
  • Multi-Racial 64,623 2.5 547
    2.8
  • Hispanic 130,836 5.1 680 3.5
  • Other 625 0.0 39 0.2
  • 2,543,484 100.0 19,205 100.0
  • (Source Childrens Services Management Info
    System, CY093, and Kids Count analysis of 2003
    Census population estimates.)

10
Why is This Important?
  • Children of color
  • are more likely to be removed from their homes
  • are less likely to be reunited with their
    parents
  • are more likely to be in multiple out-of-home
    placements
  • spend more time in care and
  • are more likely to be adjudicated in the juvenile
    justice system,
  • be placed in a residential treatment facility, or
    be waived to adult courts.

11
How Can We Move Toward Equity?
  • 1. Before we can fix overrepresentation in the
    states child welfare systems, we must be willing
    to acknowledge it openly, and make a commitment
    to change.
  • 2. Build on what we already know

12
How Can We Move Toward Equity?
  • 3. Target limited resources
  • 4. Better access to culturally proficient,
    community-based supports and services.
  • 5. Increase training on culturally proficient
    policies and practices.

13
How Can We Move Toward Equity?
  • 6. Strengthen placement options, with a focus on
    relative caregivers.
  • 7. Families and youths must be included in all
    decision-making.

14
Recommendations for change
  • 1 Prioritize Funding
  • Realign priorities and examine all funding
    sources
  • 2 Maximize Title IV-E Administrative Funding

15
Recommendations for Change
  • 3 Apply for IV-E Waiver
  • Possible services which may be part of a federal
    waiver request include, but are not limited to
  • Assisted guardianship
  • Kinship care
  • Intensive service options such as Families First
    and family reunification
  • Flexible funding individualized to family needs
  • Services for caregivers with substance use
    affecting child safety
  • Support for families with medically fragile
    children

16
Recommendations for Change
  • 4 Review Policies, Programs, and Procedures
  • Engage with an external consultant to conduct a
    comprehensive review of child welfare policies,
    procedures, programs and contracts to determine
    whether they disadvantage children and families
    of color.
  • 5 Actively Engage Families As Partners.

17
Recommendations for Change
  • 6 Integrate Services
  • General Services/Protective service workers
  • GS workers funded through TANF should be
    integrated in child welfare system
  • Indistinct blurring of poverty and physical
    neglect
  • Policy Changes Needed

18
Recommendations for Change
  • 7 Build Community Support
  • 8 Require Culturally Proficient Practices
  • 9 Require Data Collection, Monitoring, and
    Reporting

19
Recommendations for Change
  • 10 Support Vulnerable Families
  • Teen fathers and mothers
  • Relative caregivers, especially grandparents
  • Fictive kin and informal caregivers
  • Parents of children with emotional and/or
    medical needs
  • Physically, mentally and developmentally
    challenged parents
  • Foster children who become parents while still
    in care
  • Drug affected parents

20
Thank You!
  • Judy A. Hartsfield
  • Presiding Judge
  • Family Court-Juvenile Division
  • Detroit, MI
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com