Gibbs measures on trees - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gibbs measures on trees

Description:

The Replica Method. 3. 10/14/09. Gibbs Measures ... The Replica Method. 13. 10/14/09. Glauber dynamics: sampling Gibbs measures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: chris802
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gibbs measures on trees


1
Gibbs measures on trees
Elchanan Mossel, U.C. Berkeley
mossel_at_stat.berkeley.edu, http//www.cs.berkel
ey.edu/mossel/
2
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

3
Gibbs Measures
  • A Gibbs Measure on a (finite) graph G(V,E) is
    given by
  • Node potentials (?v v 2 V) and
  • Edge Potentials (?e e 2 E)
  • The probability of ? (?(v) v 2 V) 2 AV is
    given by
  • P? Z-1
  • ?v 2 V ?v?(v)
  • ?e(v,u) 2 E?e?(v),?(u)

G
  • Gibbs measures introduced in Statistical Physics.
  • Essential in Machine Learning.
  • Also known as MRFs, Graphical Models etc.

4
Uniqueness and Reconstruction
  • Let ?(v,L) (?(w) d(v,w) L).
  • Let ?(v,L)(a) P ?(v) a ?(v,L) P?(v)
    a
  • Let Gn be a family of Gibbs measures
  • Uniqueness limL ! 1 sup ?(v,L)1 v
    2 Gn 0
  • Reconstruction limL ! 1 sup ?(v,L)2 v
    2 Gn ? 0
  • Informally
  • Uniqueness 8 values of ?(v,L gtgt 1), ?(v) has
    same dist.
  • Reocn. ?(v) is typically independent
    of ?(v,L gtgt 1)

?(v,L)
?(v)
L
G
5
Gibbs measures on trees
  • On a finite tree, a Gibbs
  • measure P can be written as
  • Using recursions easy to calculate P?(v) .
    ?(v,L)
  • ) Easy to determine uniqueness when extreme
    ?(v,L) are known (Ising, Potts, Independent sets
    )
  • Open Problem 1 Given the d-ary tree and a
    general M, determine uniqueness.
  • Open Problem 2 Convex asymptotic geometry of
  • P?(v) . ?(v,L) as L ! 1

P? ??(0) ?e u ! v Me?(u),?(v)

0


-



-




-
-
  • Assume Me are identical.
  • Tree is d-ary tree.

6
Gibbs measures on trees a story
  • Let Mi,j Phair(daughter) j hair(mother)
    i
  • Suppose we know the tree T of all mothers going
    back to Eve.
  • Uniqueness Is there any assignment of hair
    color to current population that will yield
    information on Eves?
  • Reconstruction Do we expect to have
    information on Eves hair color from current
    population?

7
Reconstruction Recursive Reconstruction
Binary symmetric channel (BSC) Ising model
(no external field)
  • T 3-ary regular tree with Me M for all edges.
  • Consider the recursive majority function.
  • Let pn P n-fold rec-maj(?(0,n)) ?(0) .
  • Let ?(p) (1-?) p ? (1-p) and g(p)
    ?3(p)3?2(p)(1-?(p))
  • p0 1 and pn1 g(pn) ) pn ! ½ if and only if
    (1-2?) gt 2/3.
  • ) Reconstruction if ? lt 1/6.
  • Von-Neumann (56) for reliable noisy-computation.
  • Later Evans-Schulmann93, Steel94, Mossel98.

8
Spectral Reconstruction
  • Let M be the Ising (BSC) model on a b-ary tree T.
  • Let f(?n) Maj(?n) sign(??(v) v 2 Ln).
  • Theorem (Higuchi 77)
  • limn P?0 f(?n) gt ½ if b(1-2?)2 gt 1.
  • ) Reconstruction for ternary tree if ? lt ½ -
    (1/3)1/2.
  • Let M be any chain and T the b-ary tree
  • Let ? be the 2nd eigenvalue of M in absolute
    value.
  • ClaimKesten-Stigum66 b ? 2 gt 1 )
    Reconstruction.
  • b ? 2 1 is also threshold for census
    MosselPeres04 and robust Janson-Mossel04
    reconstruction.

9
Non Reconstruction - Coupling
  • Copying rule. For i ,-
  • Pi ! i ? 1 2 ?
  • Pi ! Uniform 1? 2 ?
  • Continuing down the tree, non-coupled elements
    form a branching process with parameter ?.

/ -
/ -

/ -










  • If 2 ? 1, branching process dies ) coupling.
  • ) for ? ¼ no reconstruction (this is not
    tight!)
  • The threshold for reconstruction is only for
  • Ising (BSC) model is given by 2?2 1.

10
Ising Model on Binary Trees
low
interm.
high
bias
bias
no bias
boundary
boundary
no bias
bias
typical boundary
typical boundary
2 ? gt 1 2?2 lt 1
2 ?2 gt 1
2 ? lt 1
Unique Gibbs measure
The transition at 2 ?2 1 was proved
by Bleher-Ruiz-Zagrebnov95,Evans-Kenyon-Peres-Sch
ulman2000,Ioffe99, Kenyon-Mossel-Peres-2001,Martin
elli-Sinclair-Weitz2004.
11
Reconstruction for Markov models
  • So the threshold b ? 2 1 is important.
  • But M-2000 it is not the threshold for
    extemality
  • Not even for 2 2 markov chains.
  • Open What is the threshold for
    q3 Potts on binary tree?
  • Very RecentBorgs-Chayes-M-Roch b ? 2 1 for
    slightly asymmetric channels.

12
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

13
Glauber dynamics sampling Gibbs measures
  • Consider the following dynamics on configuration
    ? of Gibbs measure G.
  • At rate 1
  • Pick a vertex v uniformly at random, and update
    s(v) according to the conditional probability
    given s(w) w v.
  • Easy Converges to
  • Gibbs distribution.
  • Hard How quickly?
  • Measure convergence in terms of Markov Operator.

G
14
Ising Model on Binary Trees
low
interm.
high
bias
bias
no bias
no bias
bias
typical boundary
typical boundary
2 ? gt 1 2?2 lt 1
2 ?2 gt 1
2 ? lt 1
Unique Gibbs measure
?2 ?(n1 2 log2 ? ) Reconstruction
No-Reconstruction, ?2 O(1)
In Berger-Kenyon-M-Peres05
15
Relaxation time for the binary tree
  • On Trees Fast mixing ? No-Reconstruction.
  • Vs. Common wisdom Fast mixing ? Uniqueness.
  • Martinelli-Sinclair-Weitz05
  • Log-Sob behaves in the same way as Spectral-Gap.
  • Study external-fields and boundary conditions

16
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

17
Phylogeny
  • Phylogeny is the true evolutionary relationships
    between groups of living things

Noah
Shem
Ham
Japheth
Cush
Mizraim
Kannan
18
Pyhlogenetic Inference
  • In phylogenetic inference
  • The tree is unknown.
  • Given a sequence of collections of random
    variables at the leaves (species).
  • Collections are i.i.d.
  • Want to reconstruct the tree (un-rooted).

19
Pyhlogenetic Reconstruction
20
Markov Model of Evolution
001100011101000011000100
  • Simplest evolution model binary symmetric
    channel
  • CFN Model
  • Tree T (V,E)
  • Node states
  • Mutation probabilities

0
s(r)
pra
prc
0
s(a)
pab
pa3
1
0
s(c)
s(b)
pc4
pc5
pb1
pb2
1
0
0
0
1
0 Purines (A,G) 1 Pyrimidines (C,T)
s(1)
s(4)
s(5)
s(3)
s(2)
21
Phylogenetic Inference Problem
  • Inference
  • Given i.i.d. samples at the leaves
  • Task Reconstruct the model, i.e. find tree and
    do so efficiently
  • Efficiency
  • 1) Computational Running time of reconstruction
    algorithm
  • 2) Information-theoretic Sequence length
    required for successful reconstruction
  • Let n leaves (species)
  • k length of sequences needed.

s(1)
s(4)
s(5)
s(3)
s(2)
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
pb2
prc

pra
pa3
pc5
22
Phylogeny Conjectures and Results
Reconstruction
Phylogeny
Reconstruction
k O(log n)
conj
No Reconstruction
k poly(n)
conj
Percolation
Random Cluster
critical ? 1/2
MS03
Ising model
CFN
critical ? 2?2 1
Mo04 DMR05
23
Polynomial Lower Bound at High Mutations
  • Proof

24
Logarithmic Reconstruction
  • Th2 M 2004 If T is an tree on n leaves s.t.
  • For all e, ?min lt ?(e)lt ?max and 2?2min gt 1, ?max
    lt 1.
  • Then k O(log n log ?) characters suffice to
    infer the topology with probability 1-? .
  • Caveat Need a balanced tree all leaves at the
    same distance from a root.
  • Th3 Daskalakis-M-Roch 2005 Above result holds
    for general trees.
  • Cameron,Hill,Rao 2006 Experimental
    performence.

25
Balanced Trees
  • Two-Step Algorithm M 2004
  • 1) Reconstruct one (or a few) level(s) using
    distance estimation.
  • 2) Infer sequences at roots using recursive
    majority.
  • 3) Start over

26
General Trees Daskalakis, M, Roch, 2005
27
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

28
Main analytical problems
  • How to analyze recursions of the random measures
    ?(?,L)?
  • No general techniques are known (some easy
    methods follow).
  • Needed for
  • General boundary conditions
  • Worst case (uniqueness)
  • Average case (Reconstruction)
  • Other.
  • non-regular trees (strong spatial mixing) and for
  • families of random trees (optimal error
    correcting codes).

29
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstrution
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

30
Conjecture Uniqueness on tree / graphs
  • Consider Gibbs measures where
  • All edge potentials are identical ?e ? for all
    e
  • All node potentials are trivial ?v 1 for
    all v.
  • Graph is regular of degree d.
  • Conjecture
  • Gibbs measure unique on d-regular tree )
  • Gibbs measure unique on any family of d regular
    graphs.
  • Recently proved by Weitz for anti-ferromagnet
    Ising models.
  • Trivial for random graphs.

G
T
31
Conjecture Uniqueness on tree / graphs
  • Very Recently M-Weitz-Wormald-06
  • For the hard-core model
  • Non-uniqueness of Gibbs measure on 3-regular tree
  • )
  • Exp. Slow mixing on random 3-regular graphs.
  • Reconstruction on random 3-regular graphs.
  • Moral Slow/Rapid mixing on typical graphs is
    determined by uniqueness on trees.
  • Still dont really know how to prove for
  • 4-regular graphs
  • Other models.

32
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

33
Belief Propagation in AI
  • Belief Propagation (BP) is a popular method in
    AI/Coding for estimating marginal probabilities
    P?(0) a for a Gibbs measure G.
  • It is equivalent TatikondaJordan02 to
    calculating marginal probabilities P?(0)
    a on the computation tree,T(G).
  • In particular, uniqueness on infinite computation
    tree ) convergence of BP.
  • Uniqueness High girth )
  • Convergence to correct marginals
  • Open problem Is uniqueness needed?
  • Why BP works also when girth is small?

G
T
34
Belief Propagation in Coding
  • In coding
  • BP is used to decode Low Density Parity Check
    Codes Gallager62
  • Proved to be efficient without uniquenessLMSS,R
    SU
  • Recursive Analysis up to girth of graph.
  • Open Problem Is BP efficient beyond girth?
  • Open Problem Can LDPC codes achieve Channel
    Capacity?

35
Replica Symmetry Breaking in Physics
  • In Physics
  • Replicas are recursive distributional equations
    used to calculate probabilities for spinglasses
    (random codes, random SAT problems).
  • Symmetric Replicas ? Belief Propogation.
  • Symmetry Breaking Replicas ? Survey
    Propogation.
  • MezardMontanari06 Claim Symmetry Breaks
    exactly when reconstruction emerges.
  • Open problem/Conjecture Is the reconstruction
    threshold on d-ary tree the right threshold for
    spin-glasses on random d-regular graphs?

36
Lecture Plan
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees
  • Uniqueness
  • Reconstruction
  • Mixing times on trees
  • Building Trees (Phylogeny)
  • Some analytical problems.
  • Gibbs Measures on Trees and Other Graphs
  • Uniqueness
  • Mixing Times.
  • Belief Propagation.
  • The Replica Method.

37
(No Transcript)
38
A reminder Markov Chains
  • A Markov Chain on a (finite) set S is given by an
    initial distribution ? and transition
    probabilities ? ti,j.
  • The probability of (?(t))t0T 2 AT1 is given by
  • ??(0) ?t0T-1 ? t?(t),?(t1)

?
?1
?2
?0
time
3
0
1
2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com