? production in p p and Au Au collisions in STAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

? production in p p and Au Au collisions in STAR

Description:

production in p p and Au Au collisions in STAR – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: qm200
Learn more at: https://qm2008.bnl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ? production in p p and Au Au collisions in STAR


1
? production in pp and AuAu collisions in STAR
  • Debasish Das
  • UC Davis
  • (For the STAR Collaboration)?


2

Quarkonia and the concept of suppression
Charmonia J/?, ?, ?c Bottomonia ? (1S),
?(2S), ?(3S)?
  • Heavy quarks carry the information of early stage
    of collisions
  • Charm and bottom quarks are massive.
  • Formation takes place early only in the
    collision.
  • Proposed Signature QCD phase transition
  • Color screening of static potential
    between heavy quarks
    J/??suppression Matsui and Satz, Phys.
    Lett. B 178 (1986) 416
  • Suppression of states is determined by TC and
    their binding energy
  • Lattice QCD Evaluation of spectral functions ?
    Tmelting
  • Deconfinement ? Color screening ??heavy quarkonia
    states dissolved
  • Tdiss(?) ? Tdiss(?c)lt Tdiss(?(3S)) lt Tdiss(J/?)
    ? Tdiss(?(2S)) lt Tdiss(?(1S))?
  • Their suppression pattern is a thermometer of
    the QCD matter produced.

H. Satz, HP2006
2/17
3
? States in RHIC
  • ???????????S), ????S), ???S)?
  • ?(1S) no melting at RHIC ? standard candle
    (reference)?
  • ?(2S) likely to melt at RHIC (analogous to J/?)?
  • ?(3S) melts at RHIC (analogous to ?)?
  • Pros
  • co-mover absorption is very small
  • ( C.M.Ko PLB 503, 104)?
  • recombination negligible at RHIC (?bb ltlt ?cc)?
  • STAR has efficient ??trigger and large acceptance
  • Cons
  • extremely low rate 10-9/min. bias pp interaction
  • need good resolution to separate three S-states

? measurements at RHIC ? challenge to understand
such rare probes
4
STAR ? Mass Resolution
  • STAR detector is able to resolve individual
    states of ????
  • albeit Bremsstrahlung
  • With current low statistics, yield is
    extracted from combined
  • ?(1S2S3S) states
  • FWHM 400 MeV/c2


With Inner Tracker small X/X06
W/o Inner Tracker Low X/X0
5
STAR Detectors used for ? measurements
AuAu ? Event in STAR Trigger.
  • EMC
  • Acceptance ? lt 1 , 0 lt ? lt 2?
  • High-energy tower trigger ? enhance high-pT
    sample
  • Essential for quarkonia triggers
  • ? trigger ? enhances electrons
  • Use TPC for charged tracks selection
  • Use EMC for hadron rejection
  • Electrons identified by dE/dx ionization energy
    loss in TPC
  • Select tracks with TPC, match to EMC towers above
    3 GeV

6
STAR ? Trigger (pp 200 GeV in Run 6)?
  • Sample ?-triggered Event
  • ??ee-
  • mee 9.5 GeV/c2
  • cos? -0.67
  • E1 5.6 GeV
  • E2 3.4 GeV

charged tracks
  • Full EMC acceptance ?lt1 in run 6
  • Integrated luminosity 9 pb-1 in run 6

7
STAR ? Trigger (AuAu 200 GeV in Run 7)?
  • Sample ?-triggered Event
  • ??ee-
  • mee 9.5 GeV/c2 (offline mass)?
  • cos? -0.77(offline opening angle)?
  • E1 6.6 GeV (online cluster energy
  • hardware trigger)?
  • E2 3.2 GeV (online cluster energy
  • software trigger)?



Electron Momentum gt 3 GeV/c
Challenging analysis!!!!!
  • Full EMC acceptance ?lt1 in Run 7
  • Integrated luminosity 300 µb-1 in Run 7

charged tracks
8
QM 2006 ? in Run 6 pp at vs200 GeV Invariant
Mass
  • Signal Background ? unlike-sign electron pairs
  • Background ? like-sign electron pairs ?(1S2S3S)
    total yield integrated from 7 to 11 GeV from
    background-subtracted mee distribution
  • Peak width consistent with expected mass
    resolution
  • Significance of signal is 3s
  • Note Contribution from Drell-Yan (9) ignored

9
QM 2006 STAR ? vs. Theory and World Data
STAR 2006 vs200 GeV pp ??????ee- cross
section consistent with pQCD and world data
10
? in AuAu at vs 200 GeV (Run 7)?
First Rough Look Using identical cuts
as in pp analysis. Pros
allows apples-to-apples comparison with pp
Cons not optimal for AuAu
larger
background, different trigger thresholds
  • RAA Upper Limit ? RAAlt 1.3 at
    90 CL

11
? in AuAu at vs 200 GeV (Run 7)?
Improved Analysis Pros improved
EMC-track-trigger handling ? strong signal and
enhanced S/B Cons trigger efficiency and
systematic checks not completed yet
  • Strong 4? signal
  • First measurement of ? in nucleus-nucleus
    collisions ever
  • Too early for RAA but will provide good first
    measurement
  • also need re-analysis of pp

12
Summary and Outlook
  • Full EMC trigger ? quarkonium program in STAR
  • Run 6 first mid-rapidity measurement of
    ???S2S3S)?ee- cross section at RHIC in pp
    collisions at vs200 GeV
  • Bee(ds/dy)y09128(stat.)22(syst.) pb
  • STAR ? in pp measurement is consistent with pQCD
    and world data
  • Run 7 We have the first ? measurement in heavy
    ion collisions
  • for 200 GeV AuAu
  • Strong signal
  • Soon
  • RAA of ?
  • Run 8 measurement in dAu
  • Absolute cross-section in pp, dAu, and AuAu
  • RHIC II 20 nb-1 will allow separation of 1S,
    2S, 3S states

13
Thanks!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com