Introduction to Forensics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Forensics

Description:

History and Development of Forensics. Organization of a Crime Laboratory ... Developed the science of anthropometry, a systematic procedure of taking a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: matthe287
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Forensics


1
September 2007
Introduction to Forensics
The Science Behind Catching Criminals
Mr. Schildknecht SUPA Forensics Used with
permission
2
Overview
  • Definition of Forensic Science
  • Scope
  • History and Development of Forensics
  • Organization of a Crime Laboratory
  • Functions of the Forensic Scientist
  • Analysis of Physical Evidence
  • Provision of Expert Testimony
  • Furnishing Training
  • Scientific Admissibility

3
Definition and Scope of Forensic Science
  • Forensic science is the application of science to
    those criminal and civil laws that are enforced
    by police agencies in a criminal justice system.

4
History
  • Alphonse Bertillon (1853-1914)
  • First scientific system of personal
    identification
  • Developed the science of anthropometry, a
    systematic procedure of taking a series of body
    measurements as a means of distinguishing one
    individual from another

5
Bertillon Measurements
6
History, Cont
  • Edmond Locard (1877 -1966)
  • Locards Exchange Principle the exchange of
    materials between two objects that occurs
    whenever two objects come in contact with one
    another. A cross-transfer of evidence occurs.

7
Organization of Crime Labs
  • General Organization
  • No nationally organized systemcrime labs mirror
    the fragmented law enforcement structure that
    that exists on national, state, and local levels
  • National Level
  • four major federal crime labs, FBI, DEA, ATF, US
    Postal

8
Organization, Cont
  • FBI (Department of Justice)
  • Largest crime lab in the world
  • Broad investigative powers
  • DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency)
  • Responsible for the analysis of drugs seized in
    violation of laws regulating the production,
    sale, and transportation of drugs

9
Organization, Cont
  • ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
    Explosives)
  • Responsible for the analysis of alcoholic
    beverages, weapons, and explosives in conjunction
    with the Gun Control Act and Organized Crime
    Control

10
Organization, Cont
  • State Level
  • Most state governments maintain a lab to service
    state and local law enforcement
  • Some larger cities maintain their own crime lab,
    usually under the direction of local police dept.

11
Organization Cont
  • Local Level
  • Local labs provide services to county and
    municipal agencies.
  • Generally, they operate independently of state
    labs and are financed by local government.

12
Services of the Crime Lab
13
Functions of the Forensic Scientist
  • Analysis of Physical Evidence
  • Applies the principles and techniques of the
    physical and natural sciences to the analysis of
    evidence
  • Must be aware of the demands and constraints of
    the judicial system
  • Scientific procedures and techniques must satisfy
    the criteria of admissibility established by the
    courts

14
Functions Cont
  • Provision of Expert Testimony
  • May be required to testify with respect to
    methods and conclusions at a trial or hearing.
  • Furnish Training
  • Train law enforcement in the proper recognition,
    collection, and preservation of physical evidence

15
Scientific Admissibility
  • Frye Standard
  • Court must decide if a questioned procedure,
    technique, or principles are generally accepted
    by a meaningful segment of the scientific
    community
  • In practice, this has meant providing experts to
    testify that the procedure is generally accepted
  • Courts have also taken note of books, papers, and
    past judicial decisions in this regard

16
Admissibility, Cont
  • Daubert Standard
  • Court decides on the admissibility of science in
    the courtroom
  • General Acceptance is not an absolute
    prerequisite for admissibility
  • To ascertain the veracity of scientific evidence
    presented the judge should use the following
    areas of inquiry

17
Daubert Criteria
  • Technique or theory can be (and has been) tested
  • Technique or theory has been subject to peer
    review and publication
  • Techniques potential rate of error
  • Existence and maintenance of standards
    controlling the techniques operation
  • Method or theory has attracted widespread
    acceptance within a relevant scientific community
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com