Removal of Arsenic by Ferric Hydroxide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Removal of Arsenic by Ferric Hydroxide

Description:

Andrew Lee2, Nada Assaf-Anid1 and Paul Duby2 ... Activated Alumina (AA) Ion Exchange (IE) Natural and artificial zeolite. Membrane Processes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: fabiolabr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Removal of Arsenic by Ferric Hydroxide


1
Removal of Arsenic by Ferric Hydroxide
  • Aimee Howard1, Fabiola Brusciotti2,
  • Andrew Lee2, Nada Assaf-Anid1 and Paul Duby2
  • Columbia University, Earth and Environmental
    Engineering
  • Manhattan College, Chemical Engineering
  • Prepared for presentation at
  • "Arsenic in Drinking Water An International
    Conference at
  • Columbia University", New York, 26-27 November
    2001.

2
Abstract
  • Arsenic removal from a 50 ppm solution of
    arsenic(III) by co-precipitation with ferric
    hydroxide was studied in batch and continuous
    flow reactors. Ferric hydroxide was prepared by
    mixing ferric chloride with sodium hydroxide
    added in a stoichiometric excess of 15.
    Experiments were performed at two arsenic to iron
    ratios of 15 and 110. Co-precipitation occurred
    within 1 minute and the final pH of the treated
    water was about 9. Arsenic concentration was
    measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) and
    Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
    Spectrophotometry (GFAAS). The percent removal
    reached 99.8 and led to final As concentrations
    in the 100 ppb range.

3
Introduction
  • Arsenic is present in nature as component of
    several minerals (ex. FeAsS)
  • As mobility is controlled by pH and Eh of the
    groundwater (see fig.1)
  • Most common valence states in water are As(III)
    and As(V), present as ions.

4
(No Transcript)
5
Predominance diagram for scorodite when the
activity of As dissolved compounds is equal to
10-0.7 and activity of Fe dissolved compounds is
equal to 1.
6
Background
  • As removal depends upon the ionic forms present
    and water chemistry
  • Most technologies remove As(V) more effectively
    than As(III)
  • In case As(III) is present, oxidation to As(V)
    may be required
  • Co-occurrence of other compounds (e.g. sulfate)
    and suspended solids (e.g. silica), can interfere
    with As removal

7
Removal Technologies
  • Precipitation Processes
  • Coagulation/Filtration (C/F)
  • Lime softening (LS)
  • Adsorption Processes
  • Activated Alumina (AA)
  • Ion Exchange (IE)
  • Natural and artificial zeolite
  • Membrane Processes
  • Nanofiltration (NF)
  • Reverse Osmosis (RO)
  • Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR)

8
Experimental Setup (batch)
Stirrer
pH meter
Volt meter
9
Experimental Procedure (batch)
  • Initial solution (1L)
  • As(III) 50 ppm
  • Fe as FeCl3, so that Fe/As 10 or 5
  • NaOH in excess of 15 and 20 of the
    stoichiometric amount to form Fe(OH)3
  • Stirrer 50 rpm
  • pH and Eh measurements
  • ICP and GFAAS analysis

10
Experimental Setup (column)
Initial As(III) solution
Fe(OH)3
Pump
11
Experimental Procedure (column)
  • Initial solution (1L)
  • As(III) 50 ppm (recirculated)
  • Column filling
  • Fe(OH)3, formed by adding FeCl3 (0.5g Fe) and
    NaOH (15 excess), and settled overnight
  • Flow rate 1 Liter / 30 min.

12
Results (batch)
13
Results (batch)
Fe/As 10 NaOH 15 excess
14
Results (column)
15
Conclusions
  • Batch
  • 99 removal is obtained within 1 minute
  • Final As conc is 150 ppb for Fe/As 10, and
    450 ppb for Fe/As 5
  • Final pH is about 9
  • Eh0.6 V when removal of As starts and it
    decreases during As precipitation
  • Column
  • About 95 of the arsenic is removed after three
    passes, and then up to 97.5 removal after six
    passes

16
Future Work
  • Experiments with lower initial concentrations of
    Arsenic
  • Varying experimental conditions (pH, Fe/As,
    duration, etc) to achieve lower final
    concentrations of As
  • Optimization of column setup, varying dimensions
    and flow rate
  • Tests of natural As contaminated water
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com