Title: The Artist in the Classroom: Identifying, Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in School
1The Artist in the ClassroomIdentifying,
Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in
School
Barry Oreck, Ph.D. barry_at_barryoreck.com
2Some Questions for Today What is talent or
giftedness? Why assess artistic talent? What does
talent look like in our art form? How can we
support and develop it after we identify it?
3- Gifted and Talented Programs
- Differentiation or Elitism?
- What are the strengths of Gifted and Talented
programs? - Whats wrong with G/T programs?
4Who is an Artist?
Think of an artistic experience in your own
life What are the characteristics of this
experience? What were you like when you were
engaged in it?
5Who is an Artist?
What do you mean when you say someone is an
artist?
6Henry Schaefer-Simmern (1948) The Unfolding of
Artistic Activity (foreword by John
Dewey) Seymour Sarason Teaching as a Performing
Art (1999)
7STUDENT AS ARTIST
- High Energy
- Creativity, Imagination
- Special Sensitivity to Emotions
- Less Linear
- Need to Express Ideas, Feelings
8WHAT MAKES GIFTEDNESS?
RENZULLI THREE RING CONCEPTION OF GIFTEDNESS
9WHAT MAKES ARTISTIC TALENT?
Motivation
Skills
Creativity
10(No Transcript)
11Why Assess Talent?
- Differentiation offering appropriately
challenging instruction - Kids dont know what they are good at
- Collaboration with arts specialists and outside
artists - Teacher awareness of student strengths
- Supporting transfer -- academic connections
12(No Transcript)
13The Dance, Music Theater Talent Assessment
ProcessD/M/T TAP
- 4 sessions for all students
- Observed by teacher and arts specialist(s)
- Criteria developed by artist educators from a
variety of styles and techniques - Curriculum developed by individual artist
teachers - Post-class discussion about all students
14ResultsStudents Identified for Advanced
Instruction using D/M/T TAPNew York and Ohio
- Approximately 15-20 of students identified as
ready for advanced instruction - Represent general demographic and academic makeup
of the schools - Inclusive of bilingual and special education
students
15New York City ResultsStudents Identified for
Advanced Instruction using D/M/T TAP
- 65 reading below grade level
- 25 reading in the lowest quartile
- 10-15 exhibit severe behavior and/or attendance
problems
16Ohio ResultsStudents Identified for Advanced
Instruction using D/M/T TAP
- Profile of Reading and Math Scores reflected
overall school population - Big overlap among the performing arts
- Moderate overlap between performing and visual
arts - Inter-rater reliability improved in every
assessment
17Talent Development Program
- Weekly advanced instruction during and after
school - Master classes at professional studios and
community arts organizations - Academic assistance for struggling students
- (MAGIC Merging Artistic Gifts into the
Classroom) - Assistance for parents to take advantage of
out-of-school arts classes, magnet schools,
scholarships, and other educational opportunities
18Research Results
- Teachers were excellent assessors of students
artistic talents - Interrater reliability with arts experts .65 --
.85 in dance, music and theater and improved with
each administration. - Teachers were especially aware of those students
who normally struggled in the classroom.
19I'm more aware now that many children who
struggle with academics may be gifted in the arts
and this is a good way to reach them in the
academic areas. Hamilton, Grade 2 I learned
through the identification process that my
students become vocal, they are able to express
themselves. I see they take more of an ownership
with their learning, they are able to compare and
contrast what they like and dislike about the
learning and describe what they are
learning. Cleveland, Grade 5
20Research Results
- 2. 3-year retention rates based on students
making good to excellent yearly progress
increased. - More than 80 of students remained in the program
for 3 years, up from lt50 with the prior
identification process. - Blind review of results after 2 and 3 years
provided measures of predictive validity.
21Research Results
- 3. Struggling students made significant academic
progress over 3 years based on classroom
observations, teacher grades and reports, and
standardized reading and math tests. - Students demonstrated improved self-regulatory
behaviors on classroom tasks. - Teachers reported improved attitude, attendance
and class grades. - Students made statistically significant
improvement over 2 and 3 years compared to a
matched control group.
22New York City Study Jacob Javits
GrantSelf-Regulation and Content Comprehension
in Arts and Non-arts lessons
23Reading Test Comparison3 groups
- Non-Young Talent Students (n 132)
- Matched comparison group
- Young Talent Students reading at or above grade
level (n 61) - Young Talent Students lt40th percentile
- (n 61)
24Reading Test Comparison
25Reading Test Comparison
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Exposure and Talent Assessment
Arts Talent Development
Professional Development
Strengths-Based Academic Support
School Success Improved Self-regulation Attitude,
Attendance Classroom Performance Test Score
Improvement
Parent Support
29National Educational Longitudinal Study NELS88
data (25,000 students) Involvement in the Arts
and Human Development Champions of Change
Report James S. Catterall, Richard Chapleau, John
Iwanaga, UCLA
- Positive academic developments for children
involved in the arts (high and low SES)
increasing over time grade 8-10-12. - High level of music involvement show significant
improvement in grade 12 math performance. - Sustained involvement in theater show increases
in reading proficiency, self-concept and
motivation, higher levels of empathy and
tolerance for others.
30National Educational Longitudinal Study NELS88
data (25,000 students) Involvement in the Arts
and Human Development Champions of Change
Report James S. Catterall, Richard Chapleau, John
Iwanaga, UCLA
- Students involved in the arts
- Watch significantly less television.
- Are more likely to consider community service
important. - Are less likely to report being bored in school.
31Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
32Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
33Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
34Artistic Talent Development for Urban YouthThe
Promise and the Challenge
- Barry Oreck, Susan Baum, Heather McCartney
- The National Research Center on the Gifted and
Talented - Research Monograph Series
- www.gifted.uconn.edu
35How to Assess TalentMethods
- Tests
- Performance-based assessment
- Portfolios
- Nominations (Teacher, Parent, Peer, Self)
36Methods
- Teacher Rating Scales
- Renzulli Scales for Rating the Behavioral
Characteristics of Superior Students - Tests
- Music Gordon Test of Music Audiation
- Art Clarks Drawing Test
- Dance Warburtons Measure of Creative Thinking
in Dance
37Existing Arts Identification Processes
- Performance-based Processes
- Auditions
- D/M/T TAP
- Collection of Work
- Portfolio
- Process folio
- Exhibition
38Problems with ExistingTalent Identification
Processes
- Technique Specificity and Cultural Bias
narrowing the criteria to a single style or
technique limits the range of recognizable
talents - Dependence on prior experience Talent or.
Achievement? parental support and financial
status create inequalities for which the
assessment process does not compensate - ?Verbal bias overdependence on language shows
more about students English language abilities
than their artistic talent. - One Shot Test a single audition does not show
students' potential for deeper involvement or
improvement over time
39Problems with ExistingTalent Identification
Processes
- ?Potential for anxiety children who are shy,
tense, or are having a bad day often will not be
able to display their talent or potential while
being observed and graded. - ?Lack of context test conditions bear little
resemblance to the true instructional situation - ?Difficulty of interpretation assessment
criteria and checklists are open to
interpretation and difficult for non-experts to
understand
40How to Assess TalentIssues
- Criteria connected to full range of standards
(Creating, Responding, Performing) - Validity and Reliability (fairness and
consistency) - Outstanding Behaviors vs. Proficiency or Rubric
approach - Multiple data sources (when possible)
41How to Assess TalentTeaching
- Class Structure
- Teaching vs. Assessing
- Change Groupings
- Establishing a safe environment
- Problem Solving Curriculum success vs.
challenge - Allow time for thinking and responding, multiple
attempts, perseverance to emerge
42Service Models for Talented Students
- Advanced Instruction
- Pull-out programs during school
- Before, after school and lunchtime
- Introductory and advanced levels
- Ensembles, clubs, performance groups
- Competitions, awards
43Service Models for Talented Students
- Taught by arts specialists, faculty members,
parents - Outside artists and community organizations
- Local High School and College students or
programs
44Focus Questions for Discussion
- Think of at least two students you know or have
taught who you think are potentially talented in
your art form. Identify one who is obviously
talented in traditional, measurable ways and one
whose talent may have been harder to spot and
might have surprised you. - Describe the behaviors or characteristics of
their artistic products that made you think they
had outstanding talent. - After you have a list of behaviors and
characteristics try to put the descriptors into
categories.
45Focus Questions for Discussion
- What are you doing now, formally or informally,
to identify artistic talent among your students? - Are there processes you use in your teaching that
could be used to identify potential talent?
46Focus Questions for Discussion
- What does you school and community do to serve
potentially talented students? - What more could they do?
- Are there any steps you can take in your current
role to help support talented students? - What might the next step be?
47References for this session can be found
athttp//barryoreck.com/workshophandouts.html