The Artist in the Classroom: Identifying, Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Artist in the Classroom: Identifying, Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in School

Description:

What does talent look like in our art form? ... Process folio. Exhibition. Problems with Existing. Talent Identification Processes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: valueds402
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Artist in the Classroom: Identifying, Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in School


1
The Artist in the ClassroomIdentifying,
Developing and Supporting Artistic Talent in
School
Barry Oreck, Ph.D. barry_at_barryoreck.com
2
Some Questions for Today What is talent or
giftedness? Why assess artistic talent? What does
talent look like in our art form? How can we
support and develop it after we identify it?
3
  • Gifted and Talented Programs
  • Differentiation or Elitism?
  • What are the strengths of Gifted and Talented
    programs?
  • Whats wrong with G/T programs?

4
Who is an Artist?
Think of an artistic experience in your own
life What are the characteristics of this
experience? What were you like when you were
engaged in it?
5
Who is an Artist?
What do you mean when you say someone is an
artist?
6
Henry Schaefer-Simmern (1948) The Unfolding of
Artistic Activity (foreword by John
Dewey) Seymour Sarason Teaching as a Performing
Art (1999)
7
STUDENT AS ARTIST
  • High Energy
  • Creativity, Imagination
  • Special Sensitivity to Emotions
  • Less Linear
  • Need to Express Ideas, Feelings

8
WHAT MAKES GIFTEDNESS?
RENZULLI THREE RING CONCEPTION OF GIFTEDNESS
9
WHAT MAKES ARTISTIC TALENT?
Motivation
Skills
Creativity
10
(No Transcript)
11
Why Assess Talent?
  • Differentiation offering appropriately
    challenging instruction
  • Kids dont know what they are good at
  • Collaboration with arts specialists and outside
    artists
  • Teacher awareness of student strengths
  • Supporting transfer -- academic connections

12
(No Transcript)
13
The Dance, Music Theater Talent Assessment
ProcessD/M/T TAP
  • 4 sessions for all students
  • Observed by teacher and arts specialist(s)
  • Criteria developed by artist educators from a
    variety of styles and techniques
  • Curriculum developed by individual artist
    teachers
  • Post-class discussion about all students

14
ResultsStudents Identified for Advanced
Instruction using D/M/T TAPNew York and Ohio
  • Approximately 15-20 of students identified as
    ready for advanced instruction
  • Represent general demographic and academic makeup
    of the schools
  • Inclusive of bilingual and special education
    students

15
New York City ResultsStudents Identified for
Advanced Instruction using D/M/T TAP
  • 65 reading below grade level
  • 25 reading in the lowest quartile
  • 10-15 exhibit severe behavior and/or attendance
    problems

16
Ohio ResultsStudents Identified for Advanced
Instruction using D/M/T TAP
  • Profile of Reading and Math Scores reflected
    overall school population
  • Big overlap among the performing arts
  • Moderate overlap between performing and visual
    arts
  • Inter-rater reliability improved in every
    assessment

17
Talent Development Program
  • Weekly advanced instruction during and after
    school
  • Master classes at professional studios and
    community arts organizations
  • Academic assistance for struggling students
  • (MAGIC Merging Artistic Gifts into the
    Classroom)
  • Assistance for parents to take advantage of
    out-of-school arts classes, magnet schools,
    scholarships, and other educational opportunities

18
Research Results
  • Teachers were excellent assessors of students
    artistic talents
  • Interrater reliability with arts experts .65 --
    .85 in dance, music and theater and improved with
    each administration.
  • Teachers were especially aware of those students
    who normally struggled in the classroom.

19
I'm more aware now that many children who
struggle with academics may be gifted in the arts
and this is a good way to reach them in the
academic areas. Hamilton, Grade 2 I learned
through the identification process that my
students become vocal, they are able to express
themselves. I see they take more of an ownership
with their learning, they are able to compare and
contrast what they like and dislike about the
learning and describe what they are
learning. Cleveland, Grade 5
20
Research Results
  • 2. 3-year retention rates based on students
    making good to excellent yearly progress
    increased.
  • More than 80 of students remained in the program
    for 3 years, up from lt50 with the prior
    identification process.
  • Blind review of results after 2 and 3 years
    provided measures of predictive validity.

21
Research Results
  • 3. Struggling students made significant academic
    progress over 3 years based on classroom
    observations, teacher grades and reports, and
    standardized reading and math tests.
  • Students demonstrated improved self-regulatory
    behaviors on classroom tasks.
  • Teachers reported improved attitude, attendance
    and class grades.
  • Students made statistically significant
    improvement over 2 and 3 years compared to a
    matched control group.

22
New York City Study Jacob Javits
GrantSelf-Regulation and Content Comprehension
in Arts and Non-arts lessons
23
Reading Test Comparison3 groups
  • Non-Young Talent Students (n 132)
  • Matched comparison group
  • Young Talent Students reading at or above grade
    level (n 61)
  • Young Talent Students lt40th percentile
  • (n 61)

24
Reading Test Comparison
25
Reading Test Comparison
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Exposure and Talent Assessment
Arts Talent Development
Professional Development
Strengths-Based Academic Support
School Success Improved Self-regulation Attitude,
Attendance Classroom Performance Test Score
Improvement
Parent Support
29
National Educational Longitudinal Study NELS88
data (25,000 students) Involvement in the Arts
and Human Development Champions of Change
Report James S. Catterall, Richard Chapleau, John
Iwanaga, UCLA
  • Positive academic developments for children
    involved in the arts (high and low SES)
    increasing over time grade 8-10-12.
  • High level of music involvement show significant
    improvement in grade 12 math performance.
  • Sustained involvement in theater show increases
    in reading proficiency, self-concept and
    motivation, higher levels of empathy and
    tolerance for others.

30
National Educational Longitudinal Study NELS88
data (25,000 students) Involvement in the Arts
and Human Development Champions of Change
Report James S. Catterall, Richard Chapleau, John
Iwanaga, UCLA
  • Students involved in the arts
  • Watch significantly less television.
  • Are more likely to consider community service
    important.
  • Are less likely to report being bored in school.

31
Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
32
Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
33
Champions of ChangeJames S. Catterall, UCLA
34
Artistic Talent Development for Urban YouthThe
Promise and the Challenge
  • Barry Oreck, Susan Baum, Heather McCartney
  • The National Research Center on the Gifted and
    Talented
  • Research Monograph Series
  • www.gifted.uconn.edu

35
How to Assess TalentMethods
  • Tests
  • Performance-based assessment
  • Portfolios
  • Nominations (Teacher, Parent, Peer, Self)

36
Methods
  • Teacher Rating Scales
  • Renzulli Scales for Rating the Behavioral
    Characteristics of Superior Students
  • Tests
  • Music Gordon Test of Music Audiation
  • Art Clarks Drawing Test
  • Dance Warburtons Measure of Creative Thinking
    in Dance

37
Existing Arts Identification Processes
  • Performance-based Processes
  • Auditions
  • D/M/T TAP
  • Collection of Work
  • Portfolio
  • Process folio
  • Exhibition

38
Problems with ExistingTalent Identification
Processes
  • Technique Specificity and Cultural Bias
    narrowing the criteria to a single style or
    technique limits the range of recognizable
    talents
  • Dependence on prior experience Talent or.
    Achievement? parental support and financial
    status create inequalities for which the
    assessment process does not compensate
  • ?Verbal bias overdependence on language shows
    more about students English language abilities
    than their artistic talent.
  • One Shot Test a single audition does not show
    students' potential for deeper involvement or
    improvement over time

39
Problems with ExistingTalent Identification
Processes
  • ?Potential for anxiety children who are shy,
    tense, or are having a bad day often will not be
    able to display their talent or potential while
    being observed and graded.
  • ?Lack of context test conditions bear little
    resemblance to the true instructional situation
  • ?Difficulty of interpretation assessment
    criteria and checklists are open to
    interpretation and difficult for non-experts to
    understand

40
How to Assess TalentIssues
  • Criteria connected to full range of standards
    (Creating, Responding, Performing)
  • Validity and Reliability (fairness and
    consistency)
  • Outstanding Behaviors vs. Proficiency or Rubric
    approach
  • Multiple data sources (when possible)

41
How to Assess TalentTeaching
  • Class Structure
  • Teaching vs. Assessing
  • Change Groupings
  • Establishing a safe environment
  • Problem Solving Curriculum success vs.
    challenge
  • Allow time for thinking and responding, multiple
    attempts, perseverance to emerge

42
Service Models for Talented Students
  • Advanced Instruction
  • Pull-out programs during school
  • Before, after school and lunchtime
  • Introductory and advanced levels
  • Ensembles, clubs, performance groups
  • Competitions, awards

43
Service Models for Talented Students
  • Taught by arts specialists, faculty members,
    parents
  • Outside artists and community organizations
  • Local High School and College students or
    programs

44
Focus Questions for Discussion
  • Think of at least two students you know or have
    taught who you think are potentially talented in
    your art form. Identify one who is obviously
    talented in traditional, measurable ways and one
    whose talent may have been harder to spot and
    might have surprised you.
  • Describe the behaviors or characteristics of
    their artistic products that made you think they
    had outstanding talent.
  • After you have a list of behaviors and
    characteristics try to put the descriptors into
    categories.

45
Focus Questions for Discussion
  • What are you doing now, formally or informally,
    to identify artistic talent among your students?
  • Are there processes you use in your teaching that
    could be used to identify potential talent?

46
Focus Questions for Discussion
  • What does you school and community do to serve
    potentially talented students?
  • What more could they do?
  • Are there any steps you can take in your current
    role to help support talented students?
  • What might the next step be?

47
References for this session can be found
athttp//barryoreck.com/workshophandouts.html
  • barry_at_barryoreck.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com