Radio Galaxies at High Redshifts Bruce Partridge, Haverford College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Radio Galaxies at High Redshifts Bruce Partridge, Haverford College

Description:

Radio Galaxies at High Redshifts. Bruce Partridge, Haverford College. Outline ... ?-ray to radio extragalactic background emission. CMB. 960 nW m-2 sr-1 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: brucepa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radio Galaxies at High Redshifts Bruce Partridge, Haverford College


1
Radio Galaxies at High RedshiftsBruce Partridge,
Haverford College
  • Outline
  • 1. the problem of redshifts
  • 2. source counts as an answer
  • 3. evidence for evolution of n or L, or both
  • 4. faint source counts a new population
  • 5. S (21 cm) 10-2.34 S (100?) Why?
  • 6. radio photometric redshifts
  • other radio measures of redshift

2
Measuring redshifts in radio
  • Need a line 21 cm useful, but not in pure
    synchrotron sources
  • and a technical remark most radio receivers
    have very narrow ? coverage
  • Finding zs generally left to optical follow-up
    (e.g., 3C48, the first QSO)
  • Without redshifts, cant use radio sources for
    standard ?-z or mag-z cosmological tests
  • So Ryle suggests N(m) or N(S) (not N(z)) source
    counts

3
Radio Source Counts
  • Simply count number N brighter than S
  • In static, Euclidean space, for n sources per
    Mpc3
  • each of luminosity L, the number seen with S? gt
    S
  • is N(gtS) ? S-3/2 since N ? d3 and S ? d -2
  • In curved space V ? 4/3? d3 and A ? 4? d2
  • so N(gtS) depends (slightly) on curvature
  • especially at faint (large d) end

4
  • Observed Source Counts
  • (e.g., Ryle, Ann. Rev. 6, 1968)
  • Fit no cosmological model
  • Unless evaluation assumed
  • L or n or both higher in past
  • So counts cant test cosmology
  • but do require evolution

5
  • Normalized differential source counts
  • Differential counts dont smooth over features
  • Show dN/dS ?S-5/2 for uniform distribution in
    Euclidean space

Then normalize by dividing by S-5/2 So we see
departure from uniform distrib.
6
(Normalized) Source Counts at 1.4 GHz
7
Extending Counts to Fainter Sources
  • Bulge dies away
  • - suggests a concentrated era of
  • radio source formation at z 2
  • At faint end, return to Euclidean
  • slope
  • suggests a new, local,
  • population of sources
  • starbursts, not AGN
  • (Windhorst, 1984)
  • (8 GHz counts from VLA work)

8
21 cm counts
9
Spectral Properties
  • If a new population appears, spectra may be
    different
  • -- So check counts at increasing frequency

10
Bulge decreases Note absence of counts at ?gt 5
GHz
11
Predicting Counts at Even Higher Frequencies
  • Crucial to estimates of foreground contamination
    of CMB measurements
  • Not safe to extrapolate from low frequency
    measurements
  • spectral shape changes
  • GPS sources as one example
  • also see concave spectra
  • Cluster galaxies (work with
  • Y.-T. Lin Khadija el Bouchefry)

12
Partial Counts at 30 GHz
13
Spectral Properties (1)
From Tucci et al.
14
  • High freq. (22-43 GHZ)
  • vs low freq (5-8 GHZ)
  • For cluster galaxies
  • Work with Lin
  • El Bouchefry

15
Spectral Properties (2)
  • Spectral index dis-
  • tribution changes
  • Cores (with flat spectra)
  • start to dominate
  • Sources with flat
  • spectra at low ? begin
  • to turn over
  • Smoothes distribution
  • of spectral indices
  • Magnitude of effect in
  • dispute AT20G will
  • resolve

16
Convergence of Counts?
  • If N(gtS) ? S-3/2, then NxS (surface brightness)
    diverges as S ? 0
  • So counts must converge (slope gt -1) at some
    point to avoid distorting CMB spectrum
  • Haarsma and Partridge (1998) show convergence by
    2 ?Jy at 21 cm (corresponding to 3 x 108
    sources/ster)
  • apply to convergence of FIR sources

17
Radio/FIR Correlation (Helou et al., 1985)
  • Tight correlation of 21 cm and 100? fluxes
  • S(21 cm) 10-2.34S (100?) (Helou et al., 1985)
  • Holds for ordinary spirals, starburst systems,
    ULIRGs etc.
  • Why?
  • S(21 cm) dominated by synchrotron (from SNR)
  • S(100?) from warm dust heated by OB stars
  • This correlation implies N(OB stars)/N(Mgt8Mostars)
    is constant

18
Radio/FIR Correlation
  • From VLA observations
  • of ULIRGs (Crawford et al. 1996)

19
  • If correlation assumed,
  • S(21 cm)/ S(100?) varies smoothly with z
  • And S(21 cm)/S (850?) is a rough but
  • useful redshift measure (Carilli and Yun, 1999)
  • K correction for radio sharply negative (S drops
    with z )
  • Opposite for submm
  • For a source with S(21 cm) 10-2.34 S (100?),
    and S ?-.7 near 21 cm and ?3 at 300?, at what z
    does S(21 cm) S(850?)?
  • This rough method less useful for high zboth 21
    cm and 850? fluxes have k correction of some
    sign.

20
Carilli Yun (1999) Photometric Redshift
21
  • CO lines can give precise z
  • if rough z is known.
  • e.g., CO 1-2 rotational line
  • ? 2.64 mm
  • or CO 3-2, ? 0.87 mm
  • Note precision of
  • redshift measure
  • Radio photometry CO lines can in principle
    pin down redshifts.

22
Example (from Frayer et al., 1999)
  • CO lines
  • Freq.
  • slices

23
  • To answer a question about the brightness of the
    radio sky

24
?-ray to radio extragalactic background emission
CMB 960 nW m-2 sr-1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com