Accurate Quantitative Spectroscopy of OB Stars H, He III and C IIIIIIV spectrum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Accurate Quantitative Spectroscopy of OB Stars H, He III and C IIIIIIV spectrum

Description:

Galactic & extragalactic. Mar a Fernanda Nieva. ESO lunch talk, ... for fast-rotators and low S/N (extragalactic) e(C II) e(C III): no ionization equilibrium ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: epoc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accurate Quantitative Spectroscopy of OB Stars H, He III and C IIIIIIV spectrum


1
Accurate Quantitative Spectroscopy of OB StarsH,
He I/II and C II/III/IV spectrum
  • María Fernanda Nieva(1,2)
  • Norbert Przybilla(1)
  • (1) Dr. Remeis Sternwarte Bamberg
    (Germany)
  • (2) Observatório Nacional
    (Brazil)

2
Outline
  • Introduction/Aims
  • Models/Observations
  • Our Analysis
  • Results/Other Applications
  • Summary/Conclusions/Future

3
Introduction
  • Carbon
  • Early-type OB stars
  • Carbon abundance OB-stars
  • one of most abundant metals in universe
  • created in triple alpha reaction (evolved stars)
  • CNO cycle (H ? He massive stars)
  • basis of organic chemistry
  • luminous/young/massive HR

Sun
  • present-day abundances ( ISM)
  • stellar evolution
  • chemical evolution

Galactic extragalactic
4
Introduction
e(C)log(C/H)12
  • History of e(C) in OB-type stars
  • Long-standing problem LTE/NLTE
    ( last gt 30 years 1970 )
  • (Some C models for NLTE Lennon 1980, Eber
    Butler 1988, Sigut 1996)
  • Large non-LTE effects (not well-understood)
  • e(C II) strong lines ? e(C II) weak lines
  • Strong lines C II 4267, 6578/83 ?
  • - very sensitive to non-LTE effects
  • - imp. for fast-rotators and low S/N
    (extragalactic)
  • e(C II) ? e(C III) no ionization equilibrium

5
Introduction
  • Non-LTE e(C) OB III-V in the Solar Vicinity
    (representative sources from the literature)

large scatter
Real from stellar/chemical evolution ?? Artifact
from the analysis ??
sub-solar
Also N, O, etc. Young OB stars metal poor
?? Inconsistent with chemical evolution ?
1 dex !
1.6 dex !
6
Aims of this work
  • Solution classical non-LTE problem e(C) OB-stars
  • Reliable C II/III/IV model atom calibrated with
    Galactic stars (range OB III-V)
  • Special emphasis
  • - selection input atomic data
  • - accurate atmospheric parameter determination
  • Application of model atom to other objects

7
Quantitative Spectroscopy
Our Methodology
Theory synthetic lines
Line fits
Atomic Physics
Model Atoms
Stellar Atmospheres
Chemical Abundances
Observations
  • Absolute values (Physics)
  • Not relative to other stars or Sun

Spectra
  • Non-trivial process (at all !)
  • Accuracy depends on all steps of analysis
  • Difficult controlling systematic effects

8
  • Theory
  • Model atmospheres LTE hydrostatic
    metal-blanketed in plane parallel geometry
    (ATLAS9 Kurucz 1993)
  • NLTE line formation
  • Recent versions of
  • DETAIL (Giddings, 1981)
  • SURFACE (Butler Giddings 1985)
  • State-of-the-art model atoms
  • C II/III/IV (Nieva Przybilla, 2006, in
    prep.)
  • H (Przybilla Butler 2004)
  • He I/II (Przybilla 2005)

Hybrid non-LTE approach (Nieva Przybilla
2006, subm. to AA)
radiative transfer statistical equilibrium
for non-LTE calculations
9
  • Observations
  • 6 early-B III-V apparently slow-rotators
  • 21500 lt Teff lt 32000 K
  • 3.1 lt log g lt 4.3 dex
  • randomly distributed in solar vicinity (lt 1 Kpc)
  • from associations and field
  • Spectra high S/N FEROS data
  • Spectra near-IR (FOCES, SUBARU) for 2 stars

10
Our Analysis
Step 2 Carbon
Step 1 H, He I/II
No grids ! Detailed analysis for each star !
Fine tunning for atmospheric parameters
Solve the atmosphere

Calibration of model atom
11
Step 2 Carbon
Our Analysis
Step 1 H, He I/II
I
Initial Teff , log g
I
Initial Teff , log g, x, z, e(He), v sin i
No grids ! Detailed analysis for each star !
NLTE C populations
Stellar atmosphere
Synthetic H/He/C profiles
NLTE H/He populations
Comparison with observed spectra
Synthetic H/He profiles
Variables
Comparison with observed spectra
Parameter verification
Teff , log g, x, z, e(C), v sin i
200 levels gt 1300 radiat. transitions gt 5300
collis. transitions
Empirical calibration of C model atom
Parameter verification
M
Modified Teff , log g, x, z, e(He), v sin i
New set of atomic data
Same procedure for
M
Modified Teff , log g
  • 6 early-B III-V stars
  • 21500 lt Teff lt 32000 K
  • 3.1 lt log g lt 4.3 dex

MI ?
no
MI ? se(C) min?
yes
no
Final Teff , log g, x, z, e(He), v sin i
  • Accurate Stellar Parameters
  • Calibrated C model for 1 Star
  • Accurate Carbon Abundance

yes
To Step 2
Verify Step 1
12
Near-IR
Simultaneous fits to all mesurable H/He lines
Visual
H Balmer
H Paschen Data FOCES,
Calar Alto, Spain
He I
He I K-Band Data Subaru, Hawaii
He II
Nieva Przybilla, 2006b (subm. to AA)
Data FEROS, ESO
HR 3055
13
Carbon quality of spectra/fits
up to 40 lines !!
Spectra FEROS, ESO
4267
Nieva Przybilla, 2006c (in prep.)
Abundances from line profile fits (similar values)
14
New 2 C II emission lines (not reproduced by LTE)
LTE only absorption lines radiation through
cooler medium
Teff
C II NLTE
calibration stars
NLTE coupling radiation field atomic
transitions emission upper levels overpopulated
Nieva Przybilla, 2006a, ApJ, 639, L39
Carbon abundance similar to rest of the lines
15
Sensitivity of Carbon Abundance to Atmospheric
Parameters
Our solution for HR 3055 Teff 31200200 K
log g 3.950.05 dex x 8 1 km s-1
Typical systematic discrepancies from the
literature in Teff , log g and x gtgt our
uncertainties
C IV up to 1.1 dex! C III up to 0.35 dex! C II
up to -0.35 dex!
4267
6583
Teff -2000 K
6578
log g 0.2 dex
Discrepancies increase with ? atomic data !!
x 5 km s-1
16
Results Non-LTE C abundances from individual
lines
Non-LTE vs. LTE
  • 6 early-B III-Vstars
  • 21500 lt Teff lt 32000 K
  • 3.1 lt log g lt 4.3 dex

Solution to C II/III/IV and C II/III ionization
equilibrium even for lines very sensitive to
non-LTE effects !!
17
Accurate Pristine Carbon Abundances in the Solar
Vicinity
Our results vs. literature
e(C)OB e(C)Sun (accurate results)
e(C)OB 8.33 0.03 (only uncertainties)
avoids systematic errors in atmospheric
parameters and atomic data
e(C)Sun 8.39 0.05 (total error)
18
Summary
  • State-of-the-art C II/III/IV model atom
    empirically calibrated (for NLTE calculations)
  • Critically selected input atomic data
  • Highly accurate stellar parameters/C abundances
    free of systematic errors
  • Applications to different kind of objects
  • Solution to C II/III/IV ionization equilibrium
  • Solution to (unreported) C II emission lines
  • Solution to classical C II ll 4267/6578-82 ?
    problem and now possible applications to
    fast-rotators and extragalactic objects
  • Highly uniform C abundance for 6 early B-type
    stars (nearly solar !)

Conclusions
19
References
We Thank
  • Uli Heber (support of the project)
  • Katia Cunha (support of the project)
  • Martin Altmann (FEROS data)
  • Joachim Puls (Subaru data)
  • DAAD (Ph.D. Scholarship)
  • Korn, A., Nieva, M.F., Daflon, S., Cunha, K.,
    2005, ApJ, 633, 899
  • Nieva, M.F. Przybilla, N., 2006a, ApJ, 639, L39
  • Nieva, M.F. Przybilla, N., 2006b, subm. to AA
  • Nieva, M.F. Przybilla, N., 2006c, in prep.
  • Nieva, M.F., Heber, U., Edelmann, H., Przybilla,
    N., 2006, in prep.
  • Przybilla, N., 2005, AA, 443, 293
  • Przybilla, N. Butler, K., 2004, ApJ, 609, 1181
  • Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.F., Edelmann, H., 2006,
  • Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.F., Heber, U., Edelmann,
    H., 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com