RePEc: a publicaccess database that promotes scholarly communication in Economics

1
RePEc a public-access database that promotes
scholarly communicationin Economics

• Thomas Krichel
• 2006-03-21

2
free pizza free libraries

• Thomas Krichel
• 2006-03-21

3
who is he?
4
he is "St. IGNUicus"

• A humoristic creation of Richard M. Stallman
  (RMS)
• RMS is the father of the free software movement
• a geek
• a visionary
• St. IGNUicus shows an emphasis on the moral case
  for free software, rather than the business case

5
free software vs free pizza

• Free in free software is does not mean zero
  dollar, like in free pizza.
• Instead it refers to free as in freedom.
• Richard says that free software comes with four
  freedoms.
• He developed a license that protects these
  freedoms, known as the GNU public license.

6
4 freedoms of free software

• The freedom to run the software, for any purpose.
• The freedom to study how the program works, and
  adapt it to your needs
• The freedom to redistribute copies so you can
  help your neighbor
• The freedom to improve the program, and release
  your improvements to the public, so that the
  whole community benefits

7
moral case and business case

• Other folks in the free software movement avoid
  the "f" word
• free can mean cheap
• cheap can mean bad
• They stress the business case of free software
• They use the term "open source software", (OSS)

8
RMS and us

• Amen, I tell you we librarians need to learn
  more from the OSS movement.
• We need to make the concepts coming of free
  software more a part of our business.
• Let us look at a key concept free software.

9
what has this to do with us?

• Just replace free software with free information.
  Libraries are about free information.
• But the analogy is not quite as simple.
• When we talk about free information, we usually
  mean things that we can freely read (download).
  free as in 0
• We do not usually mean free information as
  information we are free to do things with. Free
  as in freedom.

10
moral and business

• There is a moral case for free information.
  Librarians rely on it.
• There is a business case for free information.
  Librarians need to make their own.

11
from moral case to business case

• To form the business case for free information,
  think of "free information" as "freedom to do
  things" rather than 0.
• Thus libraries can make a crucial business case
  for them as agents who transform information.
• Recall that there are whole industries out there
  that produces free information.

12
Open libraries and scholarly communication

• RePEc is an example for an Open Library.
• An Open Library is loosely defined an application
  of the OSS principles to libraries.
• vague
• in the making
• but has some history
• Looking at RePEc will fix ideas.

13
scholarly communication

• Is mainly about scholars communicating
• between themselves
• to students, occasionally
• Thus it is essentially a community activity.
• Traditionally, there have been two intermediaries
  acting as external agents.
• libraries
• publishers

14
when tradition ends

• Two external shock
• There comes the Internet and reduces distribution
  costs to zero
• There comes computer technology and reduces
  storage costs somewhat
• opportunity sets of community members and
  external agents increases
• Proposition the future depends much on what the
  community members decide. External agents have
  little impact.

15
discipline communities

• Scholars of various disciplines have varying
  habits of research, publication, and evaluation
• It is likely that the Internet will emphasize
  those differences rather than reducing them.

16
examples disciplines with established informal
publishing

• Preprint communities
• Physics ? arxiv.org
• Mathematics ? arxiv.org, partially
• Working paper communities
• Computer Science ? CiteSeer
• (working paper disappearing)
• Economics ? RePEc

17
change is tough

• Change has to come inside the discipline.
• There has to come a pioneering individual who
• is technically well versed
• is managerially smart
• has extraordinary forward thinking
• is willing to take considerable risk with her
  career
• Ginsparg, Krichel, Giles Lawrence are rare

18
RePEc History

• It started with me as a research assistant an in
  the Economics Department of Loughborough
  University of Technology in 1990.
• a predecessor of the Internet allowed me to
  download free software without effort
• but academic papers had to be gathered in a
  painful way

19
CoREJ

• published by HMSO
• Photocopied lists of contents tables recently
  published economics journal received at the
  Department of Trade and Industry
• Typed list of the recently received working
  papers received by the University of Warwick
  library
• The latter was the more interesting.

20
working papers

• early accounts of research findings
• published by economics departments
• in universities
• in research centers
• in some government offices
• in multinational administrations
• disseminated through exchange agreements
• important because of 4 year publishing delay

21
1991-1992

• I planned to circulate the Warwick working paper
  list over listserv lists
• I argued it would be good for them
• increase incentives to contribute
• increase revenue for ILL
• After many trials, Warwick refused.
• During the end of that time, I was offered a
  lectureship, and decided to get working on my own
  collection.

22
1993 BibEc and WoPEc

• Fethy Mili of Université de Montréal had a good
  collection of papers and gave me his data.
• I put his bibliographic data on a gopher and
  called the service "BibEc"
• I also gathered the first ever online electronic
  working papers on a gopher and called the service
  "WoPEc".

23
NetEc consortium

• BibEc printed papers
• WoPEc electronic papers
• CodEc software
• WebEc web resource listings
• JokEc jokes
• HoPEc
• a lot of Ec!

24
WoPEc to RePEc

• WoPEc was a catalog record collection
• WoPEc remained largest web access point
• but getting contributions was tough
• In 1996 I wrote basic architecture for RePEc.
• ReDIF
• Guildford Protocol

25
1997 RePEc principle

• Many archives
• archives offer metadata about digital objects
  (mainly working papers)
• One database
• The data from all archives forms one single
  logical database despite the fact that it is held
  on different servers.
• Many services
• users can access the data through many
  interfaces.
• providers of archives offer their data to all
  interfaces at the same time. This provides for an
  optimal distribution.

26
RePEc is based on 560 archives

• WoPEc
• EconWPA
• DEGREE
• S-WoPEc
• NBER
• CEPR
• Blackwell

• US Fed in Print
• IMF
• OECD
• MIT
• University of Surrey
• CO PAH
• Elsevier

27
to form a 362k item dataset

• 171,000 working papers
• 187,000 journal articles
• 1,300 software components
• 2,100 book and chapter listings
• 9,000 author contact and publication
  listings
• 9,300 institutional contact listings

28
RePEc is used in many services

• BibEc and WoPEc
• Decomate Z39.50 service
• EconPapers
• NEP New Economics Papers
• Inomics
• RePEc author service

• IDEAS
• RuPEc
• EDIRC
• LogEc

29
describes documents

• Template-Type ReDIF-Paper 1.0
• Title Dynamic Aspect of Growth and Fiscal Policy
• Author-Name Thomas Krichel
• Author-Person RePEcper1965-06-05thomas_kriche
  l
• Author-Email T.Krichel_at_surrey.ac.uk
• Author-Name Paul Levine
• Author-Email P.Levine_at_surrey.ac.uk
• Author-WorkPlace-Name University of Surrey
• Classification-JEL C61 E21 E23 E62 O41
• File-URL ftp//www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/
  pub/RePEc/sur/surrec/surrec9601.pdf
• File-Format application/pdf
• Creation-Date 199603
• Revision-Date 199711
• Handle RePEcsursurrec9601

30
describes persons (HoPEc)

• template-type ReDIF-Person 1.0
• name-full MANKIW, N. GREGORY
• name-last MANKIW
• name-first N. GREGORY
• handle RePEcper1984-06-16N__GREGORY_MANKIW
• email ngmankiw_at_harvard.edu
• homepagehttp//post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty
  /
• mankiw/mankiw.html
• workplace-institution RePEcedideharus
• workplace-institution RePEcedinberrus
• Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv76y1986i4p
  676-91
• Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv77y1987i3p
  358-74
• Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv78y1988i2p
  173-77
• .

31
describes institutions

• Template-Type ReDIF-Institution 1.0
• Primary-Name University of Surrey
• Primary-Location Guildford
• Secondary-Name Department of Economics
• Secondary-Phone [phone]
• Secondary-Email economics_at_surrey.ac.uk
• Secondary-Fax [phone]
• Secondary-Postal Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH
• Secondary-Homepage
• http//www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/
• Handle RePEcedidesuruk

32
what do open libraries do?

• Identify records
• Relate identified records
• These actions require human control.
• They prepare for assessment of performance.

33
key to success

• Have a small group of volunteers
• Disseminate as widely as possible
• Demonstrate to authors and institutions that it
  works for them.
• institutional registration
• author registration

34
institutional registration

• It started by one sad geezer making a list of
  departments that have a web site.
• I persuaded him that his data would be more
  widely used if integrated into the RePEc
  database.
• Now he is a happy geezer and one of our three
  crucial volunteers.

35
RePEc author service

• RePEc document data has author names as strings.
• The authors register with RAS to list contact
  details and identify the papers they wrote.
• This is classic access control, but done by the
  authors.

36
author registration

• It started when funding allowed us to hire a
  crazy programmer to write an author registration
  system.
• The system went online as "HoPEc" in late 2000.
• It has been renamed "RePEc author service" (RAS)
• A recent grant from OSI allows for a rewrite and
  expansion.

37
(No Transcript)
38
LogEc

• It is a service by Sune Karlsson that tracks
  usage of items in the RePEc database
• abstract views
• downloads
• There is mail that is sent by Christian
  Zimmermann to
• archive maintainers
• RAS registrants
• that contains a monthly usage summary.

39
authors' incentives

• Authors perceive the registration as a way to
  achieve common advertising for their papers.
• Author records are used to aggregate usage logs
  across RePEc user services for all papers of an
  author.
• Stimulates a "I am bigger than you are"
  mentality. Size matters!

40
recently

• In 2004, Peter Jasco compared RePEc services with
  the EconLit proprietary professional database.
• IDEAS and LogEc were Peters pick
• EconLit was Peters pan.
• He slammed the working paper coverage of EconLit.
  
• He could have slammed other things.

41
RePEc / EconLit partnership

• RePEc now delivers all its working paper data to
  EconLit, without getting the journal data of
  EconLit in return.
• This may seem absolutely perverse! A bunch of
  volunteers laboring for a multi-million
  concern!
• In fact it serves RePEc well because it adds
  officialdom.

42
summary keys to success

• Have a small group of volunteers
• Disseminate as widely as possible
• Demonstrate to authors and institutions that it
  works for them.
• institutional registration
• author registration

43
KEY idea 1

• RePEc attracts a community of users and
  contributors
• The community itself is the focus of attention
• RePEc describes the living rather than the dead.
• Forget about documents!

44
KEY idea 2

• Forget about users!
• Disseminate widely
• Users will come through Google anyway.
• And Google loves RePEc services
• puts RePEc services top when the query consists
  of the name of an author

45
obstacles to open libraries

• lack of imagination entrepreneurship
• inability to form alliances
• user-centered thinking
• document-centered thinking
• technical competence required
• OAI PMH
• XML and XML Schema
• Unicode
• the "C" word

46
what I do for open libraries

• Create an open library for library science the
  rclis (reckless) dataset.
• Create a supporting organization
• the open library society.
• co-workers welcome!

47
http//openlib.org/home/krichel
collaboration is welcome!

• Thank you for your attention!