Comparison of 2 Population Means - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of 2 Population Means

Description:

Small-sample inference depends on distribution of individual outcomes (Normal vs ... Inference Based on Paired Samples (Crossover Designs) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: larryw4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of 2 Population Means


1
Comparison of 2 Population Means
  • Goal To compare 2 populations/treatments wrt a
    numeric outcome
  • Sampling Design Independent Samples (Parallel
    Groups) vs Paired Samples (Crossover Design)
  • Data Structure Normal vs Non-normal
  • Sample Sizes Large (n1,n2gt20) vs Small

2
Independent Samples
  • Units in the two samples are different
  • Sample sizes may or may not be equal
  • Large-sample inference based on Normal
    Distribution (Central Limit Theorem)
  • Small-sample inference depends on distribution of
    individual outcomes (Normal vs non-Normal)

3
Parameters/Estimates (Independent Samples)
  • Parameter
  • Estimator
  • Estimated standard error
  • Shape of sampling distribution
  • Normal if data are normal
  • Approximately normal if n1,n2gt20
  • Non-normal otherwise (typically)

4
Large-Sample Test of m1-m2
  • Null hypothesis The population means differ by
    D0 (which is typically 0)
  • Alternative Hypotheses
  • 1-Sided
  • 2-Sided
  • Test Statistic

5
Large-Sample Test of m1-m2
  • Decision Rule
  • 1-sided alternative
  • If zobs ? za gt Conclude m1-m2 gt D0
  • If zobs lt za gt Do not reject m1-m2 D0
  • 2-sided alternative
  • If zobs ? za/2 gt Conclude m1-m2 gt D0
  • If zobs ? -za/2 gt Conclude m1-m2 lt D0
  • If -za/2 lt zobs lt za/2 gt Do not reject m1-m2
    D0

6
Large-Sample Test of m1-m2
  • Observed Significance Level (P-Value)
  • 1-sided alternative
  • PP(z ? zobs) (From the std. Normal
    distribution)
  • 2-sided alternative
  • P2P( z? zobs ) (From the std. Normal
    distribution)
  • If P-Value ? a, then reject the null hypothesis

7
Large-Sample (1-a)100 Confidence Interval for
m1-m2
  • Confidence Coefficient (1-a) refers to the
    proportion of times this rule would provide an
    interval that contains the true parameter value
    m1-m2 if it were applied over all possible
    samples
  • Rule

8
Large-Sample (1-a)100 Confidence Interval for
m1-m2
  • For 95 Confidence Intervals, z.0251.96
  • Confidence Intervals and 2-sided tests give
    identical conclusions at same a-level
  • If entire interval is above D0, conclude m1-m2 gt
    D0
  • If entire interval is below D0, conclude m1-m2 lt
    D0
  • If interval contains D0, do not reject m1-m2 ? D0

9
Example Vitamin C for Common Cold
  • Outcome Number of Colds During Study Period for
    Each Student
  • Group 1 Given Placebo
  • Group 2 Given Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C)

Source Pauling (1971)
10
2-Sided Test to Compare Groups
  • H0 m1-m2 0 (No difference in trt effects)
  • HA m1-m2? 0 (Difference in trt effects)
  • Test Statistic
  • Decision Rule (a0.05)
  • Conclude m1-m2 gt 0 since zobs 25.3 gt z.025
    1.96

11
95 Confidence Interval for m1-m2
  • Point Estimate
  • Estimated Std. Error
  • Critical Value z.025 1.96
  • 95 CI 0.30 1.96(0.0119) ? 0.30 0.023
  • ? (0.277 , 0.323) Entire interval gt 0

12
Small-Sample Test for m1-m2 Normal Populations
  • Case 1 Common Variances (s12 s22 s2)
  • Null Hypothesis
  • Alternative Hypotheses
  • 1-Sided
  • 2-Sided
  • Test Statistic(where Sp2 is a pooled estimate
    of s2)

13
Small-Sample Test for m1-m2 Normal Populations
  • Decision Rule (Based on t-distribution with
    nn1n2-2 df)
  • 1-sided alternative
  • If tobs ? ta,n gt Conclude m1-m2 gt D0
  • If tobs lt ta,n gt Do not reject m1-m2 D0
  • 2-sided alternative
  • If tobs ? ta/2 ,n gt Conclude m1-m2 gt D0
  • If tobs ? -ta/2,n gt Conclude m1-m2 lt D0
  • If -ta/2,n lt tobs lt ta/2,n gt Do not reject
    m1-m2 D0

14
Small-Sample Test for m1-m2 Normal Populations
  • Observed Significance Level (P-Value)
  • Special Tables Needed, Printed by Statistical
    Software Packages
  • 1-sided alternative
  • PP(t ? tobs) (From the tn distribution)
  • 2-sided alternative
  • P2P( t ? tobs ) (From the tn distribution)
  • If P-Value ? a, then reject the null hypothesis

15
Small-Sample (1-a)100 Confidence Interval for
m1-m2 - Normal Populations
  • Confidence Coefficient (1-a) refers to the
    proportion of times this rule would provide an
    interval that contains the true parameter value
    m1-m2 if it were applied over all possible
    samples
  • Rule
  • Interpretations same as for large-sample CIs

16
Small-Sample Inference for m1-m2 Normal
Populations
  • Case 2 s12 ? s22
  • Dont pool variances
  • Use adjusted degrees of freedom
    (Satterthwaites Approximation)

17
Example - Scalp Wound Closure
  • Groups Stapling (n115) / Suturing (n216)
  • Outcome Physician Reported VAS Score at 1-Year
  • Conduct a 2-sided test of whether mean scores
    differ
  • Construct a 95 Confidence Interval for true
    difference

Source Khan, et al (2002)
18
Example - Scalp Wound Closure
H0 m1-m2 0 HA m1-m2 ? 0 (a
0.05)
No significant difference between 2 methods
19
Small Sample Test to Compare Two Medians -
Nonnormal Populations
  • Two Independent Samples (Parallel Groups)
  • Procedure (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test)
  • Rank measurements across samples from smallest
    (1) to largest (n1n2). Ties take average ranks.
  • Obtain the rank sum for each group (T1 , T2 )
  • 1-sided testsConclude HA M1 gt M2 if T2 ? T0
  • 2-sided testsConclude HA M1 ? M2 if min(T1,
    T2) ? T0
  • Values of T0 are given in many texts for various
    sample sizes and significance levels. P-values
    printed by statistical software packages.

20
Example - Levocabostine in Renal Patients
  • 2 Groups Non-Dialysis/Hemodialysis (n1 n2
    6)
  • Outcome Levocabastine AUC (1 Outlier/Group)

2-sided Test Conclude Medians differ if
min(T1,T2) ? 26
Source Zagornik, et al (1993)
21
Computer Output - SPSS

22
Inference Based on Paired Samples (Crossover
Designs)
  • Setting Each treatment is applied to each
    subject or pair (preferably in random order)
  • Data di is the difference in scores (Trt1-Trt2)
    for subject (pair) i
  • Parameter mD - Population mean difference
  • Sample Statistics

23
Test Concerning mD
  • Null Hypothesis H0mDD0 (almost always 0)
  • Alternative Hypotheses
  • 1-Sided HA mD gt D0
  • 2-Sided HA mD ? D0
  • Test Statistic

24
Test Concerning mD
Decision Rule (Based on t-distribution with
nn-1 df) 1-sided alternative If tobs ? ta,n
gt Conclude mD gt D0 If tobs lt ta,n gt Do
not reject mD D0 2-sided alternative If tobs ?
ta/2 ,n gt Conclude mD gt D0 If tobs ?
-ta/2,n gt Conclude mD lt D0 If -ta/2,n lt
tobs lt ta/2,n gt Do not reject mD D0
Confidence Interval for mD
25
Example - Evaluation of Transdermal Contraceptive
Patch In Adolescents
  • Subjects Adolescent Females on O.C. who then
    received Ortho Evra Patch
  • Response 5-point scores on ease of use for each
    type of contraception (1Strongly Agree)
  • Data di difference (O.C.-EVRA) for subject i
  • Summary Statistics

Source Rubinstein, et al (2004)
26
Example - Evaluation of Transdermal Contraceptive
Patch In Adolescents
  • 2-sided test for differences in ease of use
    (a0.05)
  • H0mD 0 HAmD ? 0

Conclude Mean Scores are higher for O.C., girls
find the Patch easier to use (low scores are
better)
27
Small-Sample Test For Nonnormal Data
  • Paired Samples (Crossover Design)
  • Procedure (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test)
  • Compute Differences di (as in the paired t-test)
    and obtain their absolute values (ignoring 0s)
  • Rank the observations by di (smallest1),
    averaging ranks for ties
  • Compute T and T-, the rank sums for the positive
    and negative differences, respectively
  • 1-sided testsConclude HA M1 gt M2 if T- ? T0
  • 2-sided testsConclude HA M1 ? M2 if min(T, T-
    ) ? T0
  • Values of T0 are given in many texts for various
    sample sizes and significance levels. P-values
    printed by statistical software packages.

28
Example - New MRI for 3D Coronary Angiography
  • Previous vs new Magnetization Prep Schemes (n7)
  • Response Blood/Myocardium Contrast-Noise-Ratio
  • All Differences are negative, T- 127 28,
    T 0
  • From tables for 2-sided tests, n7, a0.05,
    T02
  • Since min(0,28) ? 2, Conclude the scheme means
    differ

Source Nguyen, et al (2004)
29
Computer Output - SPSS


Note that SPSS is taking NEW-PREVIOUS in top table
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com