Estimating the number of components with defects post-release that showed no defects in testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Estimating the number of components with defects post-release that showed no defects in testing

Description:

The defects that were not detected in testing point to problems in the test process ... Using these estimates, release / re-test decisions can be made ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ecsC3
Learn more at: https://www.ecs.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Estimating the number of components with defects post-release that showed no defects in testing


1
Estimating the number of components with defects
post-release that showed no defects in
testing C. Stringfellow A. Andrews C. Wohlin H.
Peterson Jeremy Mange
2
Motivation
  • For nearly any product, defects will appear after
    release
  • The defects that were not detected in testing
    point to problems in the test process
  • We would like to know how many of these
    post-release defects to expect

3
Motivation
  • Using these estimates, release / re-test
    decisions can be made
  • The authors wish to compare methods of
    post-release defect estimation

4
Defect Estimation
  • The paper compares three methods of this type
    of estimation
  • Experience-based
  • Capture-recapture
  • Curve-fitting
  • Experience-based requires historical data,
    Capture-Recapture and Curve-fitting do not

5
Experience-based Estimation
  • Requires some sort of historical data
  • Defect data
  • Change data
  • Historical data can be from previous products or
    prior releases of the same product
  • If from previous products, they must be similar
    for these estimations to work

6
Experience-based Estimation
  • Defect data
  • Number of faults in a module can be estimated
    using the defect history of that module
  • Change data
  • Number of faults in a module can be estimated
    using the number of file changes
  • Recent changes can be weighted more heavily

7
Capture-recapture Estimation
  • A type of model originally designed for reviews
    and inspections
  • Compares the number and types of defects found
    from multiple test sites
  • Applies statistical estimation to the data based
    on assumptions about test sites

8
Capture-recapture Estimation
  • Differences between test sites are accounted for
    in two areas
  • Ability to find defects
  • Probabilities of finding specific defects
  • This yields four models
  • Same ability, same probabilities
  • Same ability, different probabilities
  • Different ability, same probabilities
  • Different ability, different probabilities

9
Capture-recapture Estimation
10
Curve-fitting Estimation
  • Fits a mathematical curve to the data points to
    estimated remaining defects
  • Two basic types
  • Decreasing plot number of test sites that found
    each defect, sorted in decreasing order
  • Increasing plot cumulative number of defects
    found by each testing event

11
Curve-fitting Estimation
  • With both increasing and decreasing models, the
    fitted curve is used to predict the number of
    remaining defects
  • Both exponential and linear prediction models
    exist for each type

12
Approach
  • 1. Collect the data
  • For each discovered defect, count the number of
    test sites that discovered it

13
Approach
  • 2. Apply non-historical methods
  • Both capture-recapture and curve-fitting models
    are applied
  • These provide estimates of the number of total
    defects

14
Approach
  • 3. Apply experience-based method
  • Use historical data to estimate the number of
    post-release defects
  • For each past project (or release), calculate

15
Approach
  • 4. Using the calculations, estimate post-
    release defects
  • For non-historical models, subtract the number of
    defects found in testing from the calculated
    total defects estimate

16
Approach
  • 5. Compare this estimate to a decision
    threshold value
  • If the number of expected post-release defects is
    acceptable, the product can be released
  • If not, further testing must be performed
  • Of course, the actual release decision will be
    based on many criteria, this is just one of those

17
Results
  • This approach was carried out in a case study on
    a medical record system
  • Results
  • Capture-recapture and curve-fitting 5-20
    error
  • Experience-based3-5 error

18
Conclusion
  • If data for similar projects is available,
    experience-based models provide the best
    estimations for post-release defects
  • However, non-historical (capture-recapture and
    curve-fitting) models also provide fairly
    accurate estimates independent of past data
  • Post-release defect estimates should be used in
    release decisions

19
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com