Voting for coalitions under STV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Voting for coalitions under STV

Description:

... FF and PDs, incumbent govt, expressed pref for continued govt, while FG and Lab ... The link varies little by year, except for Labour first pref voters ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: michae748
Category:
Tags: stv | coalitions | pref | under | voting

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Voting for coalitions under STV


1
Voting for coalitions under STV
  • Michael Marsh
  • Trinity College Dublin

2
Research question
  • Under STV voters are asked to rank candidates
  • This can also been seen as ranking the parties (
    of those candidates)
  • Lower rankings can make a difference to the
    election outcome
  • Can votes be seen as a signal of preferred
    government?

3
Parties think so
  • Parties sometimes do seek to structure choices,
    asking voters to support particular other parties
    with lower preferences
  • Parties keeping options option may choose not to
    direct their voters

4
BUT
  • Strong view that voters at least as attracted to
    candidates as to parties
  • 40 plus say main concern is good local candidate
  • Almost 40 say they are attracted by candidate
    rather than party and would follow candidate to
    different party
  • A Minority vote a straight party ticket

5
2002 and 2007
  • 2002 FF and PDs, incumbent govt, close, but FG
    and Labour more independent
  • 2007 FF and PDs, incumbent govt, expressed pref
    for continued govt, while FG and Lab alternative
    coalition Greens kept options open

6
Labour leaflet, Dublin SE
7
FG leaflet, Cork SW
8
How would we know
  • Extensive analysis of transfer patterns from
    aggregate results
  • Where do votes of eliminated candidates go?
  • Where do surplus votes of elected candidates go?

9
Transfers and party cues
  • Kennedy (in Representation, 2002) looked at
    transfers and cues 1987-97
  • Discovered transfer proportion from party A to
    party B almost 4 times as large when party A/B
    signalled closeness as when they did not

10
Transfers in 2007
11
Data from exit polls
  • Over 3000 cases in both 2002 and 2007
  • Coalition prefs untainted by outcome
  • Some indication of lower prefs, but vague what
    other parties supported
  • Analysis restricted to those expressing just one
    other choice
  • Analysis also restricted to constituencies where
    all parties fielded candidates
  • N thus 884 and 1467 respectively

12
Numbers of parties supported
13
FF voters second prefs
14
FG voters second prefs
15
Labour voters second prefs
16
Coalition Preference
17
Coalition pref by 1st pref
2002 and 2007 combined
18
Effect of coalition preference on preference
votes 2002-7


Coalition Pref

SF odds gt 80
19
Effect of coalition preference on first pref
vote, by year
SF145


Coalition Pref
20
Effect of coalition preference on second pref
vote, by year
Coalition Pref
21
Effect of a coalition preference on second pref
vote, by year and first pref
22
(No Transcript)
23
Candidate centred voters
24
Difference between party and candidate oriented
voters
25
Conclusion
  • Clear link between vote and coalition preference
  • There is a very strong link with first preference
    vote
  • There is a link, but not at all so strong for
    second preference votes
  • The link varies a lot across parties
  • The link varies little by year, except for Labour
    first pref voters
  • No difference between more/less candidate centred
    voters

26
So what?
  • Seems STV can be used to signal coalition
    preferences
  • But also can signal other things for which we
    have no codes, particularly on second preferences
  • And of course it could be that voters want
    candidates/parties they vote for in government
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com