Using onsite wood wastes and sludge Energy for Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPI Residues to Revenues

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Using onsite wood wastes and sludge Energy for Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPI Residues to Revenues

Description:

With pre-heated under-grate air. Fluidised bed technology was discounted: ... Ongoing grate/refractory damage. Treatment at source/prevention is work in progress ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Kal59

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using onsite wood wastes and sludge Energy for Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPI Residues to Revenues


1
Using on-site wood wastes and sludge Energy for
Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPIResidues to
Revenues 2005Mike Suggate
2
Contents
  • Project background
  • Technologies adopted, and why
  • Fifteen months on - some of the lessons

3
WPIs project drivers
  • High and uncertain energy costs
  • Reliance on LPG
  • Obsolete and unreliable bark burner
  • Disposal of 20,000t pa pulp sludge
  • Need to reduce costs

4
The commercial relationship
  • WPI/EFI energy partnership
  • Heat supply
  • 12 MW thermal fluid heater
  • Commissioned June 2004
  • Long-term electricity supply contract
  • Energy efficiency initiatives
  • Contractually committing EFI to deliver services
    via a BOOT contract

5
Thermal energy
  • Previously
  • Pre-heaters - 3 MW
  • Bark burner - 4 MW
  • LPG - 6 MW
  • Total - 15 MW
  • Project objective To minimize LPG use, utilize
    waste
  • Pre-heaters - 3 MW
  • Heat plant - 810 MW
  • Balance LPG

6
Available fuels
  • Woodwaste
  • Bark from site de-barker
  • Imported sawdust, other wood wastes
  • Chipped forest residue
  • Stockpiled waste
  • Pulp sludge
  • Mix of biological and mechanical

7
Pulp sludges
  • Expensive to landfill, new resource consent
    difficult
  • Screw presses achieve 60 - 75 moisture content
  • Additional drying stage required
  • At 50 moisture content CV 10 GJ/tonne
  • Clinkering was major risk
  • Alkali metals (sodium) from bleaching process

8
Heat plant selection criteria
  • Fuel is the main driver
  • Other considerations
  • Reliability
  • 15-year commitment, performance guarantees
  • Life-cycle costs
  • Re-use of existing equipment
  • Primary heat plant options considered
  • Fluidised bed
  • Grate

9
Fluidised bed combustion
  • Ideal for wet fuels (65 max)
  • Thermal mass of sand bed gives stable combustion
  • Generally less risk of clinkering
  • More complex and expensive
  • Operating costs higher sand and fluidising
    energy

10
Grate combustion
  • Available in smaller boiler sizes
  • Vibrating pin hole or moving grates
  • Fuel burns on grate, in suspension
  • Lower capital operating costs
  • More sensitive to changes in fuel quality
  • Biomass moisture limit around 60

11
The solution adopted
  • Easteel heater with...
  • Babcock and Wilcox vibrating grate technology
  • Detroit stoker
  • Intech thermal fluid coil
  • Flue gas recirculation
  • Low gas velocities
  • Waste heat recovery for sludge drying
  • Disc type sludge dryer
  • Upgrades to WPIs sludge treatment plant
  • Substantial upgrades to existing fuel supply
    systems

12
The Heat Plant
13
The process
4
6
7
1
2
3
5
5
1
Wood screening hogging
Steam to sludge dryer
6
2
Existing bark silo
Sludge surge bin and conveyor
3
7
Heat plant
Sludge dryer
4
Thermal fluid to flash dryers
14
Why a vibrating grate?
  • Track record with NZ pinus radiata, bark and
    sawdust
  • US reference site burning pulp sludges
  • Clinkering risk manageable
  • Acceptable performance on wet fuels,
  • With pre-heated under-grate air
  • Fluidised bed technology was discounted
  • Tests on WPI fuels indicated high propensity to
    clinkering
  • Complex and more expensive

15
Fuel challenges
  • Very wet
  • High levels of fines
  • Variability
  • Alkali metals
  • Rock contamination
  • Blending issues
  • Abrasion

16
Effect of high moisture
  • Leads to low efficiency, unstable combustion
  • Plant more expensive
  • Excess moisture must be heated and vaporised
  • EFI guarantees
  • MCR at 62 moisture
  • Can burn up to 65
  • May require supplementary fuels
  • Coal, oil

17
Fuel sizing
  • Size is important
  • Stable combustion requires good ash bed on grate
  • Fines
  • Burn above grate in suspension
  • Carry over and block fly-ash systems
  • Mixing/blending is a key
  • Wet and fine fuel is the killer

18
Waste sludge to fuel
  • The practice of landfilling is ending
  • Solution - convert sludge to fuel
  • Optimising WPI treatment plant performance
  • Doubling dry solids density
  • Installing disc dryer to dry sludge to gt 50
    solids
  • Specific design of combustion systems

19
Fuel handling
  • Upgrades included new hogger, screens, conveying
    systems
  • Inherited silo
  • Screws and conveyors
  • Very high erosion rates from pumice, rock
  • Trialling different materials for flights on
    screws
  • Continuing excessive wear

20
Ash-handling fuel contamination
  • Pumice abrasion was anticipated
  • Rocks were not and remain a major issue
  • Re-engineering/replacement
  • Grate ash conveyor
  • Fly-ash rotary valves
  • Ongoing grate/refractory damage
  • Treatment at source/prevention is work in
    progress

21
Combustion air
  • Problems were
  • Performance spec not met
  • Combustion unstable
  • Fine ash/fuel blown through heater
  • Redesign for
  • Less but hotter primary air under grate
  • More secondary air and turbulence
  • Results
  • Transformed plant performance
  • On fine, wet fuels

22
Plant performance
  • Capable of greater than 12 MW
  • MCR on 62 moisture fuel
  • Average load higher than anticipated
  • Stable, essentially unattended, operation
  • Efficiency tested at 55, on 61 wet fuel
  • Guarantee is 48, on 62 wet fuel
  • Availability guarantees
  • First year gt90
  • Subsequent years gt95

23
Ongoing projects
  • Supplementary coal systems
  • Fuel - blending and quality improvement
  • Rock removal, or control
  • Abrasion-proofing high-wear plant items
  • Reinstatement of steam pre-heaters
  • Plant optimisation ongoing

24
How do WPI view the project?
  • Reduction in LPG consumption by gt3 million litres
    pa
  • All sludge burnt - avoided land filling
  • Technical issues, but these resolved
  • New plant without capital outlay
  • Performance guarantees achieved
  • Benefits of EFI and Easteel expertise realised
  • Outsourcing of project risks has paid off

25
In conclusion
  • A very difficult technical application
  • The plant had a range of teething problems
  • Now achieving project goals, guaranteed
    performance
  • Main residual issue is fuel-caused abrasion
  • Good initial design eliminated potential
    problems
  • Performance on wet/fine fuel
  • Slagging, clinkering
  • Drying and burning sludge
  • Key to the projects success a close working
    partnership between Energy for Industry, WPI and
    Easteel

26
Contact us P 04 381 1330 W www.energyforindustr
y.co.nz
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)