Title: Using onsite wood wastes and sludge Energy for Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPI Residues to Revenues
1Using on-site wood wastes and sludge Energy for
Industrys 12MW Heat Plant at WPIResidues to
Revenues 2005Mike Suggate
2Contents
- Project background
- Technologies adopted, and why
- Fifteen months on - some of the lessons
3WPIs project drivers
- High and uncertain energy costs
- Reliance on LPG
- Obsolete and unreliable bark burner
- Disposal of 20,000t pa pulp sludge
- Need to reduce costs
4The commercial relationship
- WPI/EFI energy partnership
- Heat supply
- 12 MW thermal fluid heater
- Commissioned June 2004
- Long-term electricity supply contract
- Energy efficiency initiatives
- Contractually committing EFI to deliver services
via a BOOT contract
5Thermal energy
- Previously
- Pre-heaters - 3 MW
- Bark burner - 4 MW
- LPG - 6 MW
- Total - 15 MW
- Project objective To minimize LPG use, utilize
waste - Pre-heaters - 3 MW
- Heat plant - 810 MW
- Balance LPG
6Available fuels
- Woodwaste
- Bark from site de-barker
- Imported sawdust, other wood wastes
- Chipped forest residue
- Stockpiled waste
- Pulp sludge
- Mix of biological and mechanical
7Pulp sludges
- Expensive to landfill, new resource consent
difficult - Screw presses achieve 60 - 75 moisture content
- Additional drying stage required
- At 50 moisture content CV 10 GJ/tonne
- Clinkering was major risk
- Alkali metals (sodium) from bleaching process
8Heat plant selection criteria
- Fuel is the main driver
- Other considerations
- Reliability
- 15-year commitment, performance guarantees
- Life-cycle costs
- Re-use of existing equipment
- Primary heat plant options considered
- Fluidised bed
- Grate
9Fluidised bed combustion
- Ideal for wet fuels (65 max)
- Thermal mass of sand bed gives stable combustion
- Generally less risk of clinkering
- More complex and expensive
- Operating costs higher sand and fluidising
energy
10Grate combustion
- Available in smaller boiler sizes
- Vibrating pin hole or moving grates
- Fuel burns on grate, in suspension
- Lower capital operating costs
- More sensitive to changes in fuel quality
- Biomass moisture limit around 60
11The solution adopted
- Easteel heater with...
- Babcock and Wilcox vibrating grate technology
- Detroit stoker
- Intech thermal fluid coil
- Flue gas recirculation
- Low gas velocities
- Waste heat recovery for sludge drying
- Disc type sludge dryer
- Upgrades to WPIs sludge treatment plant
- Substantial upgrades to existing fuel supply
systems
12The Heat Plant
13The process
4
6
7
1
2
3
5
5
1
Wood screening hogging
Steam to sludge dryer
6
2
Existing bark silo
Sludge surge bin and conveyor
3
7
Heat plant
Sludge dryer
4
Thermal fluid to flash dryers
14Why a vibrating grate?
- Track record with NZ pinus radiata, bark and
sawdust - US reference site burning pulp sludges
- Clinkering risk manageable
- Acceptable performance on wet fuels,
- With pre-heated under-grate air
- Fluidised bed technology was discounted
- Tests on WPI fuels indicated high propensity to
clinkering - Complex and more expensive
15Fuel challenges
- Very wet
- High levels of fines
- Variability
- Alkali metals
- Rock contamination
- Blending issues
- Abrasion
16Effect of high moisture
- Leads to low efficiency, unstable combustion
- Plant more expensive
- Excess moisture must be heated and vaporised
- EFI guarantees
- MCR at 62 moisture
- Can burn up to 65
- May require supplementary fuels
- Coal, oil
17Fuel sizing
- Size is important
- Stable combustion requires good ash bed on grate
- Fines
- Burn above grate in suspension
- Carry over and block fly-ash systems
- Mixing/blending is a key
- Wet and fine fuel is the killer
18Waste sludge to fuel
- The practice of landfilling is ending
- Solution - convert sludge to fuel
- Optimising WPI treatment plant performance
- Doubling dry solids density
- Installing disc dryer to dry sludge to gt 50
solids - Specific design of combustion systems
19Fuel handling
- Upgrades included new hogger, screens, conveying
systems - Inherited silo
- Screws and conveyors
- Very high erosion rates from pumice, rock
- Trialling different materials for flights on
screws - Continuing excessive wear
20Ash-handling fuel contamination
- Pumice abrasion was anticipated
- Rocks were not and remain a major issue
- Re-engineering/replacement
- Grate ash conveyor
- Fly-ash rotary valves
- Ongoing grate/refractory damage
- Treatment at source/prevention is work in
progress
21Combustion air
- Problems were
- Performance spec not met
- Combustion unstable
- Fine ash/fuel blown through heater
- Redesign for
- Less but hotter primary air under grate
- More secondary air and turbulence
- Results
- Transformed plant performance
- On fine, wet fuels
22Plant performance
- Capable of greater than 12 MW
- MCR on 62 moisture fuel
- Average load higher than anticipated
- Stable, essentially unattended, operation
- Efficiency tested at 55, on 61 wet fuel
- Guarantee is 48, on 62 wet fuel
- Availability guarantees
- First year gt90
- Subsequent years gt95
23Ongoing projects
- Supplementary coal systems
- Fuel - blending and quality improvement
- Rock removal, or control
- Abrasion-proofing high-wear plant items
- Reinstatement of steam pre-heaters
- Plant optimisation ongoing
24How do WPI view the project?
- Reduction in LPG consumption by gt3 million litres
pa - All sludge burnt - avoided land filling
- Technical issues, but these resolved
- New plant without capital outlay
- Performance guarantees achieved
- Benefits of EFI and Easteel expertise realised
- Outsourcing of project risks has paid off
25In conclusion
- A very difficult technical application
- The plant had a range of teething problems
- Now achieving project goals, guaranteed
performance - Main residual issue is fuel-caused abrasion
- Good initial design eliminated potential
problems - Performance on wet/fine fuel
- Slagging, clinkering
- Drying and burning sludge
- Key to the projects success a close working
partnership between Energy for Industry, WPI and
Easteel
26Contact us P 04 381 1330 W www.energyforindustr
y.co.nz