Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Update of the Mayo Clinic Roche - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Update of the Mayo Clinic Roche

Description:

... in Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Update of the Mayo Clinic Rochester Experience ... Up from 14% in prior Mayo review. IORT for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:395
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Mayo85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Update of the Mayo Clinic Roche


1
Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in
Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Update of the Mayo
Clinic Rochester Experience
  • Ivy Petersen

2
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasAnalysis Group
  • March 1981- January 2008
  • 226 patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue
    sarcoma
  • Treated
  • Maximum surgical resection
  • Intraoperative irradiation (IOERT/IOHDR)
  • External beam irradiation (EBRT) when feasible
  • Median follow-up 3.3 years (range 0.2 23.7)

3
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasPopulation
  • Age (years)
  • Median 57
  • Range 10 - 88
  • Gender
  • Female 102 (45)
  • Male 124 (55)

4
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasTumor
Characteristics
  • Disease status
  • Primary 116 (51)
  • Recurrent 110 (49)
  • Size (cm)
  • Median 10 cm
  • Range 2 36 cm

5
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasTumor
Characteristics
  • Primary (116) Recurrent (110)
  • Grade
  • Low 30 (26) 49 (45)
  • High 86 (74) 61 (55)
  • Prior surgery 35 (30) 110 (100)
  • Prior EBRT 8 (7) 28 (25)
  • Prior chemo 8 (7) 91 (83)
  • Up from 14 in prior Mayo review

6
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSurgical
Treatment
  • Surgical outcome
  • R0 89 (39)
  • R1 112 (50)
  • R2 25 (11)

7
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasExternal Beam
Treatment
  • Patients receiving EBRT
  • Primary tumors 115/116 (99)
  • Recurrent tumors 96/110 (87)
  • Dose (Gy)
  • Median 45
  • Range 10 - 65
  • Timing of EBRT
  • Preoperative 172 (82)
  • Postoperative 27
  • Both 12

8
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasIORT Treatment
  • Number of fields treated
  • One 175
  • Two 41
  • gt 3 10
  • Dose (Gy)
  • Median 12.5
  • Range 5 - 30
  • (95 7.8 23 Gy)

9
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasIORT Treatment
  • Energy
  • Median 9 MeV (54)
  • Range 6 20 MeV
  • Field size
  • Median length 12 cm
  • Median width 8 cm
  • Range 4.5 20 cm

10
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasOverall Outcome
  • Overall Survival
  • 3 year 67
  • 5 year 50

11
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSurvival
Impact of Surgery
  • Median survival
  • R0 39
  • R1 50
  • R2 11
  • p 0.08

12
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSurvival
Impact of Surgery
p 0.08
13
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSurvival
Impact of Disease Status
14
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSurvival
Impact of Grade
p 0.053
15
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasLocal Control
Overall
  • Local control
  • 3 years 81
  • 5 years 69

16
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasLocal Control
Impact of Surgery
p 0.548
17
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasLocal Control
Impact of Grade
p 0.73
18
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasLocal Control
Impact of Disease Status
p 0.003
19
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasDistant
Metastases Rate
  • Distant metastases
  • 3 year 36
  • 5 year 43

20
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasDistant
Metastases Rate Impact of Grade
p 0.0004
21
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasNeurotoxicity
  • Grade No. of patients
  • Total 69 (31)
  • Mild 29 (42)
  • Moderate 24 (35)
  • Severe 16 (23)
  • IORT felt to contribute to gt90

22
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasAny Grade 3-5
Toxicity (including neuro)
  • Grade 3 4 toxicity
  • 28/226 (12)
  • Grade 5 toxicity
  • 12/228 (5)
  • RT contributed to 6
  • Surgery contributed to 7
  • Disease contributed to 2
  • Other causes contributed to 8
  • None were felt to be related to IORT

23
IORT for Retroperitoneal SarcomasSummary
  • Study suggests
  • Importance of complete surgical resection to
    microscopic residual
  • Impact of grade on survival/rate of distant
    metastases and therefore the need for better
    systemic agents
  • Primary disease has better local control but this
    does not translate to a higher survival

24
Acknowledgements
  • My colleagues
  • Michael G. Haddock
  • Scott L. Stafford
  • John H. Donohue
  • David M. Nagorney
  • Leonard L. Gunderson
  • Physics team
  • Our patients.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com