Plagiarism prevention or detection The educative capabilities of SafeAssignment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Plagiarism prevention or detection The educative capabilities of SafeAssignment

Description:

Longest verbatim-copied string. No. of highlighted sentences % matching text per sentence ... Verbatim copy (85%) Inadequate paraphrase - phrase interchange (10 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: dom1104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Plagiarism prevention or detection The educative capabilities of SafeAssignment


1
Plagiarism prevention or detection? The educative
capabilities of SafeAssignment
  • Dominic Keuskamp Regina Sliuzas
  • Student Learning Centre
  • Flinders University

2
Background
  • Prolific public academic discussion regarding
    plagiarism within higher education
  • High profile student staff cases
  • Most universities have employed academic
    integrity policies procedures, to prevent
    similar occurrences
  • Plagiarism widely seen as a threat to the basis
    of (Western) academia trust in ethical behaviour
    is the cultural glue that enables academia to
    function successfully (Rosamond 2002, p.168).
  • Tightening of attitudes towards borrowing ideas
    with more competitive performance-driven
    academic environments?

3
Online bandits
  • Has plagiarism increased with the explosion of
    online resourcesand the ease with which students
    can cut paste?
  • or has it always occurred simply become more
    visible as awareness of the issue has increased?
  • Changes in students attitudes to information due
    to its ready availability on the Internet?
  • One-armed bandit syndrome (Barberio 2004)
  • Search engines as an ever-available knowledge
    prosthesis (Gorman 2007)
  • New ethics and values for digital natives
    file-sharing, Web 2.0

4
Our perspective
  • Faculty-based teaching staff more likely to take
    punitive approach
  • ALL advisers play unique role
  • assisting students to develop academic literacy
  • more likely to be aware of reasons that
    plagiarism has occurred in the writing process

5
Text-matching software
  • Turnitin, SafeAssignment etc.
  • Matches entire text of submitted work with
    electronic archive, highlights matched text
    sources, gives matched text in a generated
    report
  • Primarily promoted to enhance detection, although
    attention drawn to educative potential
  • Through the provision of student access to the
    software, students can learn more about the
    process of academic writing thereby improving
    their skills. (Flinders University Teaching
    Learning website)

6
(No Transcript)
7
Questions for research teaching
  • How does TMS communicate with students?
  • Does it lead to a greater understanding of
    academic integrity?

8
Methodology
  • Analysis of 21 reports from voluntarily submitted
    assignments
  • Students not identified but comprised diverse
    group
  • Information provided by reports is predominantly
    in numerical form, so quantitative approach taken

9
Data collection
10
(No Transcript)
11
Results
  • Overall mean of 4 matching text per assignment
    (24 with none)
  • 29 of assignments included adjudged plagiarism
    within highlighted sentences
  • 15 of instances of adjudged plagiarism resulted
    from inadequate paraphrase - phrase
    interchange/synonym substitution.
  • 95 of the highlighted sentences adjudged
    non-plagiarised contained text of a generic or
    technical nature, or contained proper nouns.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Conclusions
  • TMS statistics alone are insufficient for
    judgement regarding plagiarism
  • Students must command multiple literacies
  • Thresholds of text-matching need careful
    evaluation
  • Students perceptions of the information
    communicated to them remain to be identified
  • Utility of TMS for detection far clearer than for
    educationand what of prevention?

14
Wider considerations
  • Scanlon (2006) questions whether the use of TMS
    is technologism, which includes attempts to
    operationalize ethics in a decision algorithm
    (Dombrowski 1995)
  • Are we shifting the burden of decision making
    (for student and lecturer) onto a system,
    bypassing consideration of pedagogical ethical
    questions?
  • Ethics cannot be reduced to technai because of
    the uniqueness of every situation (Dombrowksi
    1995)

15
  • Article published as
  • Plagiarism prevention or detection? The
    contribution of text-matching software to
    education about academic integrity JALL 1(1)
    A91-A99
  • Available at
  • http//www.aall.org.au/journal/ojs/index.php/jall/
    article/view/29/41
  • Or contact
  • Dominic.keuskamp_at_flinders.edu.au
  • Regina.sliuzas_at_flinders.edu.au
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com