Promotion and Tenure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Promotion and Tenure

Description:

Recognition of academic accomplishment and advancement by faculty members at the ... Provost reviews decisions and can overrule; President is the ultimate judge, but ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: waynestate8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Promotion and Tenure


1
Promotion and Tenure
  • Stephen A. Lerner, M.D.
  • Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs
  • WSU School of Medicine

2
Significance of Promotion (and Tenure)
  • Recognition of academic accomplishment and
    advancement by faculty members at the Department
    and School levels
  • Recognition and commitment by the University PT
    Committee and the Provost (and the Board of
    Governors)
  • Promotion raise

3
Faculty Tracks
  • Know your track!
  • Research-Educator
  • Clinician-Educator
  • Research
  • Track is stated explicitly by the Chair in the
    Letter of Offer which you sign at the time of
    appointment
  • The criteria for appointment and promotion depend
    on the rank and track
  • Refer to the Factors and Guidelines for Promotion

4
Curriculum Vitae (CV)
  • The official record of your academic career
  • Use WSU format (for ease and efficiency of
    review)
  • Assure accuracy (inaccuracies jeopardize
    credibility)
  • The CV can be updated at any stage in the review
    process, up to the review by the WSU PT Committee

5
Scholarship
  • Important for all faculty, but less emphasis for
    Clinician-Educators
  • Omit submitted manuscripts, but include submitted
    grant proposals
  • Include accepted articles (in press)
  • No expectation of prescribed numbers of papers or
    grants

6
Scholarship (2)
  • The SOM Executive Committee looks for focus of
    interest and accomplishment, and at the
    trajectory of papers over time (consistency, esp.
    recently)
  • A disproportionate excess of abstracts over
    published papers (i.e., abstracts not converted
    to publications) raises a red flag

7
Teaching
  • Important for all faculty, esp.
    Clinician-Educators
  • Teaching Portfolio
  • Documentation of quantity and impact
    (evaluations by learners by peers, if available)
  • Documentation of innovative teaching and/or
    curriculum development

8
Service
  • Department
  • School of Medicine
  • University
  • DMC or VA
  • Profession (includes external visibility)
  • Scholarly (editorial board, study section,
    abstract reviewer, scientific program organizer)
  • Society committees

9
Explain
  • You know yourself better than anyone else.
  • The reviewers will not always understand the
    significance of an entry in the CV.
  • For publications, provide an explanation of
    quality, significance, and impact,either in the
    CV, in an appended personal statement, and/or the
    Chairs letter.
  • For multi-authored publications, grants, and
    contracts, indicate in the CV your contribution
    and role. For instance, for clinical studies
    design and execution of the study, analysis of
    the data, role in writing the publication.

10
Personal Statement
  • Not required at this time, but recommended to
    convey your view of your academic career and
    where you are heading.
  • Set your evaluation materials in the perspective
    of your discipline, so an outside evaluator
    understands the big picture of your academic life
    and the relationships among the various
    components.
  • Can also be used for self-evaluation and for
    helping others to mentor you.

11
Personal Statement (2)
  • Possible points to consider
  • What am I doing?
  • Why am I doing it?
  • How am I doing it (methods/strategies)?
  • How well am I doing it?
  • Where am I going in this aspect of my career?
  • Where am I going overall? What is my vision?
    What do I want to accomplish?

12
External Review Letters
  • Extremely important!
  • Candidate and Chair (or designee) provide six
    names, contact information, and position and
    qualifications all reviewers must be at or above
    the rank to which the candidate is to be promoted
  • The Department solicits three, and the Exec.
    Comm. solicits three
  • Reviewers should not have any direct academic
    relationship with the candidate (e.g., mentor,
    former departmental colleague, collaborator)

13
External Review Letters (2)
  • The most credible letters critically review the
    scholarly (and teaching, if known)
    accomplishments of the candidate
  • It adds credibility if the writer mentions
    his/her prior experience on a PT Committee
  • Very helpful if the writer concludes with a
    statement that the candidate would surely be
    promoted in a comparable track at his/her
    institution (or even would be competitive)

14
PT Process
  • Promotion package is initiated by Department
  • CV, TP, and 3 external review letters are
    reviewed by Dept. PT Committee
  • If approved by PT Comm., Dept. Chairs letter of
    support (very important) accompanies the package
    to SOM Executive Committee
  • Exec. Comm. (EC) of the Fac. Senate functions as
    the SOM PT Committee
  • Package (plus 3 additional external letters
    solicited by the SOM) is reviewed by PT Comm. in
    early Dec.
  • If denied, can be appealed in Jan.
  • If approved (2/3 vote), sent to WSU with EC Chair
    letter

15
PT Process (2)
  • WSU PT Comm. reviews packages in March-April
  • Provost reviews decisions and can overrule
    President is the ultimate judge, but rarely
    intervenes
  • Congratulations! Promotion is effective in
    August

16
Faculty Development Environment
17
Current Activities
18
Manuscript Writing Course
  • Faculty with data ready for writing
  • Each participant is matched with an individual
    faculty mentor
  • Six monthly didactic and interactive sessions
  • Regular assignments and deadlines

19
Welcome to Wayne SOM New Faculty Orientation
20
Workshop Academic Documentation for Annual
Merit Review and Promotion and Tenure
ProcessesPowerPoint Presentations on Faculty
Senate websitehttp//www.med.wayne.edu/faculty_s
enate/ Streaming video available on SOM
websitehttp//www.med.wayne.edu/news_media/strea
mingmedia/somevents/index.asp
21
Faculty Affairs Website (Soon to go live)
  • Directory of SOM, WSU, regional, and national
    resources and information for faculty
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Career development
  • Link to Faculty Senate website
  • Online resources

22
Future Activities
  • Repeat manuscript writing course annually
  • Offer new faculty orientation programs annually
    or semiannually
  • Maintain and improve faculty affairs website
  • Offer leadership development programs
  • Offer teaching improvement programs

23
For any questions regarding faculty issues
  • Contact
  • Stephen A. Lerner, M.D.
  • Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs
  • slerner_at_med.wayne.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com