Unconventional current-phase relations in YBCO dc-SQUIDs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Unconventional current-phase relations in YBCO dc-SQUIDs

Description:

The presence of a second harmonic in the current phase relation ... Conclusion. We show that a 2nd harmonic, Even below the double well formation threshold ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: sergecha
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unconventional current-phase relations in YBCO dc-SQUIDs


1
Unconventional current-phase relations in YBCO
dc-SQUIDs
  • S.A. Charleboisa, T. Lindströma, A.Ya.
    Tzalenchukb, Z. Ivanova, T. Claesona
  • aDep. of Microtechnology and Nanoscience -
    Quantum Device Physics Laboratory, Chalmers
    University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg,
    Sweden
  • bNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington,
    Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK

2
The presence of a second harmonic in the current
phase relation
  • p-loops have been extensively studied in d-wave
    HTS 1.
  • Aside from those, high misorientation bicrystal
    Josephson junctions in HTS are expected to have
    unconventional CPR 2.
  • Observation of a second harmonic in the CPR of
    HTS bicrystals has been reported previously
    3,4,6.
  • We discuss expected features of the critical
    current versus magnetic field curves in such
    cases.
  • We report the observation of these features in
    0-45 bicrystal YBCO junctions.

3
Excellent correspondence
2µmjunctions
Theory
Experiment
Critical current The theoretical curve (red in
the right figure) fits the measurement very well
SQUID response The theoretical curve (left) fits
the measurements (left) show good qualitative
agreement
4
Different behavior in submicron junctions
  • Junctions have lower Ic then expected for their
    size
  • Width ? 10 but Ic ? 100
  • Indicates reduced transparency
  • The SQUIDs with submicron junctions do not show
    doubling in Ic(?) curves
  • Thermal averaging (EJ kBT) could hide the
    effect of the 2nd harmonic on the Ic(?) curves
  • A small shift between the positive and negative
    current bias is observed
  • approx. 0.1Fo

The critical current vs. applied magnetic field
for two SQUIDs with the same loop size
(1515) µm2. SQUID A 0.3/0.2 µm wide junctions
(values multiplied by 10 for clarity). SQUID B
2/2 µm junctions. All curves measured at 4 K.
5
Symmetric SQUID
Position of the minima and maxima of Ic(?)
Ic(?) for various values of ?
  • Complex secondary maxima develop at (n1)? for
    ?gt½
  • for ?gt½, the potential is double well like
  • No shift between and current bias
  • Modulation is not complete even though the
    junctions are identical

6
Asymmetric SQUID
Position of the minima and maxima of Ic(?)
Ic(?) for various values of ?
  • Secondary maxima develop for ?gt½
  • for ?gt½, the potential is double well like
  • the position is parameter dependant
  • Shift between and current bias
  • Shift present for ?lt½ where the potential is not
    double well like

7
Conclusion
  • We show that a 2nd harmonic,
  • Even below the double well formation threshold
    (?lt½ )
  • Leads to observable shift in the Ic(?) extrema
  • Reduces significantly the amplitude of SQUID
    modulations
  • We have observed unconventional CPR in submicron
    0-45 bicrystal Josephson junctions
  • shift with bias polarity inversion
  • It confirms the high quality of the junctions is
    preserved by the fabrication technology
  • Note on fabricationThe YBCO films were grown by
    pulsed laser deposition on 0-45 SrTiO3
    bicrystal substrates. The films thickness is
    250 nm. The SQUIDs were fabricated by Ar ion
    milling through an amorphous carbon mask
    patterned by electron beam lithography 5.
  • References
  • 1 C.C. Tsuei and J.R. Kirtley,Rev. Mod. Phys.
    72 (2000) 969.
  • 2 A.M. Zagoskin cond-mat/9903170 T. Löfwander,
    V.S. Shumeiko, G. Wendin, Supercond. Sci.
    Technol. 14 (2001) R53.
  • 3 E. Ilichev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86
    (2001) 5369 I.V. Borisenko et al., Physica C 368
    (2002) 328.
  • 4 T. Lindström et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90
    (2003) 11702.
  • 5 A.Yu. Tzalenchuk et al., submitted to Phys.
    Rev. B.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com