Hydrologic Hazard Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Hydrologic Hazard Communication

Description:

Flood Warning for Forecast Points (FLW) ... bogged down by flash flood vs. areal flood vs. river flood? confused by watches and warnings? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:250
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: david3028
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hydrologic Hazard Communication


1
Hydrologic Hazard Communication
NOAAs National Weather Service
  • Britt Westergard
  • Service Hydrologist
  • WFO Jackson, KY
  • WASIS Workshop, July 2006

NOAAs National Weather Service
2
Major Challenges
  • NWS issues flood warnings? Really?
  • Products vs Information
  • Verification vs Perception
  • (focus on Flash Flood Warnings)

3
Multi-tiered Concept
Products vs. Information
  • Ready
  • Outlooks
  • Set
  • Watches
  • Go
  • Warnings
  • Advisories

4
NWS Hydrologic Products
Products vs. Information
  • Hydrologic Outlook (ESF)
  • Areal Flood Watch (FFA)
  • Flood Watch for Forecast Points (FFA)
  • Flash Flood Warning (FFW)
  • Flash Flood Statement (FFS)
  • Flood Warning for Forecast Points (FLW)
  • Flood Statement Follow-up to Flood Warning for
    Forecast Points (FLS)
  • Areal Flood Warning (FLW)
  • Flood Statement Follow-up to Areal Flood
    Warning (FLS)
  • Flood Statement Areal Advisories (FLS)
  • Flood Statement Flood Advisory for Forecast
    Points
  • Hydrologic Statement (RVS)
  • Hydrologic Summary (RVA)
  • River and Lake Forecast Product (RVD)
  • Hydrometeorological Data Products (RRx)
  • Hydrometeorological Data Summary Products (HYx)

5
Outreach
Products vs. Information
  • We provide
  • Actions to take (Turn Around, Dont Drown)
  • Information sources (NWR, internet)
  • Call-to-action statements in products
  • But is the public
  • bogged down by flash flood vs. areal flood vs.
    river flood?
  • confused by watches and warnings? What about
    advisories?

6
Flash Flood vs. River Flood
Verification vs. Perception
  • Short-fused events (FFW) and long-fused events
    (FLW)
  • River flood warnings
  • related to hydrograph - graphical association
  • would be relatively simple to introduce
    uncertainty graphics
  • verification perception (exceed flood stage is
    cut dried)
  • Flash flood warnings
  • less quantifiable
  • Verification and perception diverge?

7
Verification Guidelines
Verification vs. Perception
  • A Flash Flood occurs within 6 hours of a
    causative event
  • River or stream flows out of its banks and is a
    threat to life or property.
  • Person or vehicle is swept away by flowing water
    from runoff that inundates
  • adjacent grounds.
  • A maintained county or state road is closed by
    high water.
  • Approximately six inches or more of water flows
    over a road or bridge. This
  • includes low water crossings in a heavy rain
    event that is more than localized
  • (i.e., radar and observer reports indicate
    flooding in nearby locations) and poses
  • a threat to life or property.
  • Dam break or ice jam release causes dangerous
    out of bank stream flows or
  • inundates normally dry areas, creating a hazard
    to life or property.
  • Any amount of water in contact, flowing into or
    causing damage of an above
  • ground residence or public building and is runoff
    from adjacent grounds.
  • Three feet or more of ponded water that poses a
    threat to life or property.
  • Mudslide, rock slide or debris flow caused by
    rainfall (could possibly occur in a
  • burned area with only light to moderate
    rainfall).

8
Opportunities for Change
  • Bridge gap between products and action taken
  • Determine usefulness of product suite?
  • Modify outreach strategy?
  • Reach back to concept of products to re-evaluate?
  • What is a flash flood anyway?
  • Guidelines are based on safety is there a
    better basis?
  • Convey uncertainty in short- and long-fused
    products
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com