CVD Critical Pathways Group 2006 Teleconferences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

CVD Critical Pathways Group 2006 Teleconferences

Description:

... AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Merck & Co., Inc. ... The incidental angiographic documentation of stent occlusion in the absence of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: ncme1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CVD Critical Pathways Group 2006 Teleconferences


1
CVD Critical Pathways Group 2006 Teleconferences
  • November 8, 2006
  • 1200 Noon ET (900 AM PT)

This activity is supported by an educational
grant from the Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi
Pharmaceuticals Partnership.
2
Faculty
Christopher P. Cannon, MDAssociate Professor of
MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolSenior
Investigator, TIMI Study GroupAssociate
Physician, Cardiovascular DivisionBrigham and
Womens HospitalBoston, Massachusetts
3
Disclosure Statement
  • The Network for Continuing Medical Education
    requires that CME faculty disclose, during the
    planning of an activity, the existence of any
    personal financial or other relationships they or
    their spouses/partners have with the commercial
    supporter of the activity or with the
    manufacturer of any commercial product or service
    discussed in the activity.

4
Faculty Disclosure Statement
  • Christopher P. Cannon, MD, has received
    grant/research support from Merck Co., Inc.,
    AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and
    Merck/Schering Plough Partnership. He has served
    as a consultant on scientific/advisory boards of
    AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers
    Squibb Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Co.,
    Inc., Merck/Schering Plough Partnership, Pfizer
    Inc, sanofi-aventis, and Schering-Plough
    Corporation. He has received honoraria for CME
    lectures supported by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
    LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Merck Co.,
    Inc., Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer
    Inc, sanofi-aventis, and Schering-Plough
    Corporation.
  • John S. Wilson, MD, representing the Allegheny
    General Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
    reports no such relationships.

5
Polling Question 1
  • Have the recent reports regarding late-stent
    thrombosis had an impact on your clinical
    practice?
  • Yes, I am more likely to use bare-metal stents
    than drug-eluting stents (DES)
  • Yes, I am more likely to prescribe an extended
    duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for
    patients with DES
  • Yes, both 1 and 2
  • No, the studies have not changed my practice

6
Highlights From the 2006 Transcatheter
Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) Conference
  • Christopher P. Cannon, MD

7
Highlights From TCT 2006
  • Academic Research Consortium proposed new
    definitions for stent thrombosis
  • DEScover Registry prospective, multicenter,
    observational study that characterized PCI
    patients from a broad sampling of hospitals and
    practice
  • PREMIER Registry prospective, multicenter
    evaluation of premature discontinuation of
    thienopyridine therapy after DES
  • REWARDS Registry registry of 2769 patients
    receiving either Cypher or Taxus stents
    evaluated risk of thrombosis
  • STENT Thrombosis Registry multicenter,
    prospective registry to evaluate long-term
    efficacy and safety of DES in real-world patients
    and clinical situations
  • ACUITY-PCI Substudy a prospective trial of
    patients with ACS undergoing PCI after
    randomization to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa
    inhibitors vs bivalirudin with or without GP
    IIb/IIIa inhibitors

8
Academic Research Consortium Proposed
Definitions for Stent Thrombosis
Expanded Stent Thrombosis Definition Timing
Acute Thrombosis 0 24 hrs. post Subacute
Thrombosis gt24 hrs 30 days post Late
Thrombosis 30 days 1 year post Very Late
Thrombosis gt1 year post
  • Definite/Confirmed
  • Probable
  • Possible

Acute/Subacute can also be replaced by early
stent thrombosis. Early stent thrombosis 0-30
days. Cutlip D. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
9
Academic Research Consortium Proposed
Definitions for Stent Thrombosis
1. Definite/Confirmed
  • Autopsy evidence or angiographic confirmed stent
    thrombosis (definite) is
  • considered to have occurred if
  • TIMI flow is
  • Grade 0 with occlusion originating in the stent
    or segment 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent
    region in the presence of thrombus
  • Grade 1, 2, 3 originating in the stent or in the
    segment 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent
    region in the presence of thrombus
  • AND at least one of the following criteria within
    48 hrs
  • New onset of ischemic symptoms at rest (typical
    chest pain with duration gt20 minutes)
  • New ischemic ECG changes suggestive of acute
    ischemia
  • Typical rise and fall in cardiac biomarkers (gt2x
    ULN of CK)

The incidental angiographic documentation of
stent occlusion in the absence of clinical
syndromes is not considered a confirmed stent
thrombosis (silent thrombosis). Cutlip D.
Presented at TCT October 2006 Washington, DC.
10
Academic Research Consortium Proposed
Definitions for Stent Thrombosis
2. Probable
  • Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have
    occurred in the
  • following cases
  • Any unexplained death within the first 30 days.
  • Irrespective of the time after the index
    procedure, any MI in the absence of any obvious
    cause which is related to documented acute
    ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent
    without angiographic confirmation of stent
    thrombosis.

3. Possible
Possible stent thrombosis is considered to have
occurred with any unexplained death beyond 30
days.
Cutlip D. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
11
CYPHER RCT Stent Thrombosis 4-Year Follow-up
Expanded Definition
Definite Probable Possible
Data from 4 pooled RCT SIRIUS, E and C SIRIUS
and RAVEL. Log Rank Test P-value. Cutlip D.
Presented at TCT October 2006 Washington, DC.
12
CYPHER RCT Stent Thrombosis 4-Year Follow-up
Expanded Definition
Definite Probable
Data from 4 pooled RCT SIRIUS, E and C SIRIUS
and RAVEL. Log Rank (exact) Test P-value.
Cutlip D. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
13
DEScover Registry
  • Prospective, multicenter, observational study
    that characterized PCI patients from a broad
    sampling of hospitals and practice
  • 6906 patients at 140 medical centers in the US
    undergoing PCI with stenting were followed for up
    to 1 year
  • 96 of patients received stents vs 4 who
    received balloon angioplasty
  • 5 of patients treated with bare-metal stents
  • 95 treated with drug-eluting stents (55
    sirolimus-eluting stent 38 paclitaxel-eluting
    stent)

Williams DO, et al. Circulation. 2006114.
14
DEScover Registry Events at 1-Year Bare-Metal
Stents vs Drug-Eluting Stents
  • Small, but significant baseline differences in
    the selection of patients for BMS vs DES eg, BMS
    patients were significantly older and had more
    severe disease and more ST-elevation MI at
    presentation
  • Data were not randomized
  • Small number of patients treated with BMS does
    not allow for valid efficacy comparisons

Williams DO, et al. Circulation. 2006114.
15
PREMIER Registry
  • Prospectively collected data from 19 centers
    examining the prevalence and predictors of
    thienopyridine discontinuation 30 days after DES
    treatment
  • Compared mortality and cardiac hospitalization
    rates for the next 11 months for patients
    continuing vs discontinuing thienopyridine
    therapy
  • 2498 MI patients enrolled 500 patients who
    received a DES were available for follow-up

Spertus JA, et al. Circulation.
20061132803-2809.
16
PREMIER Registry Factors Associated With
Discontinuing Thienopyridine Therapy
  • Nearly 1 in 7 patients (13.6) reported
    discontinuing therapy 1 month postdischarge

Age (per 10 years) Male Non-Caucasian Not
married No high school diploma Avoided care due
to cost Not depressed Pre-existing cardiovascular
disease Anemia No DC medication instructions Not
referred to rehab Discharged on Coumadin
Factors Associated With Discontinuing
Thienopyridine Therapy
0.5
1
2
Odds Ratio
Figure shows the fully adjusted, multivariable,
logistic-regression model for discontinuing
thienopyridine therapy within 30 days of
discharge for an MI treated with a DES. Point
estimates are represented by points, and the 95
CIs are shown as bars.
Spertus JA, et al. Circulation.
20061132803-2809.
17
PREMIER Registry Mortality Among Patients
Continuing vs Discontinuing Thienopyridine Therapy
15
Plt.001
Continued Discontinued
10
Mortality ()
5
0
Months
The Kaplan-Meier mortality plots show the rate of
death for those who continued thienopyridine
therapy (solid line) and those who did not
(dashed line). The origin is at the time of the
patients MI, but the lines begin at the 1-month
assessment point.
Spertus JA, et al. Circulation.
20061132803-2809.
18
Mortality Data From the BASKET LATE Trial and
PREMIER Registry
PREMIER Registry Data All cause death according
to minimum 30 day thienopyridine therapy duration
()
BASKET LATE Trial Cardiac death in DES vs BMS ()
7.5
2
8
P.09
Plt.0001
6
1.2
1
Patients
4
Patients
2
0.7
0.0
0
0
Stopped thienopyridines
Stayed on thienopyridines
DES
BMS
  • In the BASKET LATE Trial, cardiac death trended
    higher in the DES group than in the BMS group
    during the year following clopidogrel
    discontinuation (1.2 vs 0, P.09).
  • Data from the PREMIER registry looked exclusively
    at AMI patients who received DES and suggested
    that patients who discontinued thienopyridine
    therapy early within 30 days in this instance
    were significantly more likely to die over the
    next 11 months (Plt.0001).

Pfisterer ME. Presented at ACC 2006 Spertus JA,
et al. Circulation. 20061132803-2809. Adapted
with permission from www.clinicaltrialresults.org.

19
Angioscopy Follow-up 6 Months After SES or BMS
Implanatation
(N46, 66 lesions 33 SES, 33 BMS)
Grade 0 No neointima
Grade 1 Thin neointima
Grade 2 Full neointima
Visible Thrombus
P.031
100
80
60
Frequency of Persistence of Thrombus ()
40
Plt.001 comparedwith the corresponding segment
in the BMS.
20
0
n7 SES
n7 BMS
Takano M, et al. Eur Heart J. 2006272189-2195.
20
Milan/Siegburg Experience
Stent thrombosis after DES (SES or PES)
occurredin 29/2229 pts (1.3) at 9.3 5.6 mos
Several patient and lesion subgroups have a
higher stent thrombosis rate than
identified in RCTs
29.0
8.7
5.5
3.5
3.2
2.6
2.0
1.3
Unstable angina
Prior Brachy Rx
Thrombus
Diabetes
Unprot. left main
Bifurcation
Renal failure
Premature antiplatelet d/c
Iakovou I, et al. JAMA. 20052932126-2130.
21
Frequency of and Risk Factors for Stent
Thrombosis After DES Implantation During
Long-Term Follow-up
  • 1,911 consecutive DES-treated patients
  • Median follow-up 19.4 months
  • Incidence of stent thrombosis 7.8 (5 of 64
    patients) with premature interruption of aspirin
    or clopidogrel, or both (vs 0.5 in those
    without, Plt.001)
  • MV predictors of late-stent thrombosis
  • Premature interruption of antiplatelet therapy
  • Renal failure

Park D-W. Am J Cardiol. 200698352-356.
22
Correlates and Long-Term Outcomes of
Angiographically Proven Stent Thrombosis With
Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
  • 12-month incidence of stent thrombosis 1.27 (38
    patients)
  • 8 patients (0.3) had late (gt30 days) stent
    thrombosis
  • Clopidogrel discontinuation in 37 of ST
    patients, 11 of non-ST (Plt.001)
  • MV predictors of stent thrombosis
  • Cessation of clopidogrel
  • Renal failure
  • Bifurcation lesions
  • In-stent restenosis

Kuchulakanti PK. Circulation. 20061131108-1113.
23
REWARDS Registry Cypher vs Taxus Stents
  • Registry of 2769 patients at Washington Hospital
    receiving either Cypher (n1925) or Taxus stents
    (n844) evaluated risk of thrombosis
  • Cypher patients received clopidogrel for at least
    3 months and Taxus patients for at least 6
    months investigators recommended 1 yr of
    treatment for all patients
  • At 6 months, clopidogrel compliance was 83.5 in
    the Cypher group, 90.6 in the Taxus group
    (P.043)
  • Clopidogrel compliance not significantly
    different between the groups at the time of
    thrombosis

Waksman R. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
24
REWARDS Registry Cypher vs Taxus Stents
  • Overall incidence of stent thrombosis 1.6
  • 1 yr incidence of stent thrombosis 1.9 in
    Cypher group vs 0.8 in Taxus group (P.034)
  • Repeat target lesion revascularization 3.2 in
    Cypher group vs 1.8 in Taxus group (P.039)
  • No significant differences in in-hospital
    complications
  • At 1, 6, 12 months, rates of MACE, target vessel
    revascularization, and target lesion
    revascularization were comparable
  • No significant differences in MACE in subgroup
    analyses of complex patients, but greater risk
    of stent thrombosis in the Cypher group

Including ostial lesions, in-stent restenosis,
non-native coronary artery lesions, lesions
longer than 33 mm, type C lesions, chronic total
occlusions, 2 or more DES, acute MI, type 1
diabetes, or prior CABG.
Waksman R. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
25
STENT Thrombosis Registry
  • STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New
    Therapies) multicenter, prospective US registry
    to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of DES
    in real-world patients and clinical situations
  • Established in 2003 gt20,000 patients enrolled
  • Second phase of registry to begin early 2007
    will enroll approximately 10,000 new patients
    undergoing DES implantation

Simonton C. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
26
STENT Thrombosis Registry 9-Month Clinical
Outcomes
  • Evaluated all patients enrolled from May 2003 to
    September 2005 and completing 9-month follow-up
  • Patients undergoing repeat PCI within the target
    lesion for restenosis of a DES were eligible

Simonton C. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
27
STENT Thrombosis Registry 9-Month Clinical
Outcomes
DES Restenosis Patients Unadjusted Outcomes
25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0
DES-Rx NON DES-Rx
19.8
Pgt.05 for all
15.4
11.6
Percent of Patients
10.3
8.1
5.1
5.1
3.5
3.5
0.0
Death
MI
TVR
MACE
SAT
Simonton C. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
28
ACUITY-PCI Substudy
  • Prospective trial of 7789 moderate- and high-risk
    patients with ACS from the ACUITY trial who
    underwent PCI
  • Patients randomized to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa
    inhibitors vs bivalirudin with or without GP
    IIb/IIIa inhibitors
  • Use of drug-eluting stents was approximately 60
    in all 3 groups
  • Primary end point at 30 days non-CABG major
    bleeding
  • Other end points Death, MI, unplanned
    revascularization, and ischemic composite,
    combining these net clinical benefit, combining
    ischemic and bleeding events

Stone GW. Presented at TCT October 2006
Washington, DC.
29
ACUITY-PCI Composite Ischemia
Heparin IIb/IIIa vs Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa vs
Bivalirudin Alone
15
10
P.36
Event Rate ()
Estimate
P (log rank)
5
Heparin IIb/IIIa (N2561)
8.4
Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa (N2609)
.15
9.4
.45
Bivalirudin alone (N2619)
8.9
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Days from Randomization
Heparin unfractionated or enoxaparin. Stone
GW. Presented at TCT October 2006 Washington,
DC.
30
ACUITY-PCI Major Bleeding (Non-CABG)
Heparin IIb/IIIa vs Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa vs
Bivalirudin Alone
15
Estimate
P (log rank)
Heparin IIb/IIIa (N2561)
6.8
Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa (N2609)
.31
7.6
lt.001
Bivalirudin alone (N2619)
3.5
10
Event Rate ()
Plt.0001
5
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Days from Randomization
Heparin unfractionated or enoxaparin. Stone
GW. Presented at TCT October 2006 Washington,
DC.
31
ACUITY-PCI Net Clinical Outcomes
Heparin IIb/IIIa vs Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa vs
Bivalirudin Alone
15
P.001
10
Event Rate ()
P (log rank)
Estimate
5
13.5
Heparin IIb/IIIa (N2561)
.10
Bivalirudin IIb/IIIa (N2609)
15.1
.049
Bivalirudin alone (N2619)
11.7
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Days from Randomization
Heparin unfractionated or enoxaparin. Stone
GW. Presented at TCT October 2006 Washington,
DC.
32
Featured Institution
Allegheny General HospitalPittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
33
Polling Question 2
If you participated in a previous teleconference,
how much progress have you made since
then? (Please refer to the checklists on the
next 3 slides.)
  • 1) We are currently on the same item
  • 2) We have since moved to the next checkbox on
    the checklist
  • 3) We have progressed by more than one item on
    the checklist
  • ACS pathways are up-to-date and regularly
    followed

34
Progress ChecklistImmediate Goals
35
Progress ChecklistShort-term Goals/Activities
36
Progress ChecklistLong-term Goals/Activities
37
Question-and-Answer Session
38
Concluding RemarksChristopher P. Cannon, MD
Next programWednesday, December 6, 2006 300
PM ET (1200 Noon PT)TopicHighlights From the
2006 American Heart Association Scientific
Sessions FacultyGregg C. Fonarow, MD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com