Title: How Safe Are YOUR toys? A study on toy product safety
1How Safe Are YOUR toys? A study
on toy product safety
- Mercer University School of Engineering
- Professional Practices, Dr. Davis
- A.Fair
2Societys reaction to the issue
- Today, China is responsible for about 100 of all
product recalls-it makes 70 to 80 of all toys
sold in the United States - China manufactured all of the recalled toys last
year - Most recalls were done by the companies after the
problems were discovered or complaints were filed
3Society (Pt. 2) The recalls
- Hasbros Easy Bake ovens, and the Thomas and
Friends train set were among the many toys
recalled since last year - Mattel alone has recalled more than 20 million
toys in August, and 700,000 in September - The main cause for the recalls were the
lead-contaminated paint that was used to coat the
toys
4Social Aspects (Pt.3)What are the risks?
- There are a number of risks that can occur from
the use of faulty toys such as - Choking risks
- Contamination (lead poison, asbestos, toxic
chemicals) - Injuries (brain damage, intestinal damage)
- And Death.
5Social Aspects (Pt. 3 cont.)A specific look at
the consequences...
- The worst that could happen
- A 17 month-old named Daniel Keysar died after
being strangled by the rails of his Playskool
crib - Unfortunately, his parents found out (after his
death) that the crib had been recalled five years
earlier - The main cause for this incident the lack of
publicity given to the recall
6Social Aspects (Pt. 4)What does the government
plan to do?
- The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
- Julie Vallese, spokesperson for the CPSC says
that the agency knows that there must be more
done to prevent the hazardous products from being
imported from China into the United States. - CPSC has safety standardsHowever, only 100 field
inspectors and compliance personnel conduct
inspections at ports, warehouse, and stores were
many toys are held and sold - The staff at the CPSC has been cut by more than
10 over the past 2 years meaning that there are
less people to regulate the safety of products - The Toy Industry Association wants its members to
test the imported toys regularly - Chinas own government auditing agency says that
20 of the toys in China had safety hazards
according to a report in the China Daily
7Social Aspects (Pt. 5)What more is the
government planning?...
- The CPSC Act of 2007
- Plans to raise the limit on CPSC fines to
companies (congress is still in debate over the
maximum amount of money to fine but it may be
100 million) - Allows CPSC to notify the public more on product
safety hazards - Bans lead in childrens products completely
(including but not limited to lead paint)
8Technologys role behind the toy recalls(And
what the government plans to do about it.)
- The United States Consumer Product Safety
Commission is to develop procedures for
monitoring labs that test products for federal
standards - The CPSC Act of 2007 will create a procedure by
which independent labs will test the safety of
the childrens products - Historically, labs tested products to see if
they worked as the companys claimed - Testing fees are paid for by the companies that
supply the product - There is a potential problem with this
- Testing can be ignored because the labs are
dependent upon the retailers that supply them
with funding for business
9A closer look into the problem...
- Wal-Marts relationship with its testing lab is
an example - Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc. receives most
of its business from Wal-Mart - Until recently, CTL did not have the proper
laboratory accreditations common with labs of its
size - It was responsible for testing all of the
retailers toys that were found with lead - In the past, faulty toys and cribs that have been
recalled passed through test-labs before being
sold - CTL was given its Chemical Testing Certificate
(which allows it to run these tests) only a few
weeks ago by the Association of Laboratory
Accreditation - Today, Wal-Mart does not depend upon this
particular lab as it did in the past
10Other problems...are engineers to blame?
- Other recalls resulted due to small magnets that
were deadly when swallowed - Lead to one death and 33 emergency surgeries
- Some recalls have less to do with design
engineering and more to do with poor supervision
of offshore manufacturers - However, this does not mean that failures cant
be attributed to design errors
11ReferencesBibliography
- Eviatar, D. (2008, January 21). Toy story.
Nation, 286, 4-6. - Katel, P. (2007). Consumer safety so government
regulators need more power?. CQ Researcher, 17
(36), 841-864. - Lipton, E.S., Barboza, D. (2007, June 19). As
more toys are recalled, the trail ends in China.
The New York Times, pp. 1A-4C. - Lund, A.E. (1998). Beware of toys. Journal of the
American Dental Association, 129 (6), 680. - Mcwilliams, G., Mcqueen, M.p. (2008, March 7).
Bills give labs job of finding risks in kids
products. The Wall Street Journal, pp. 1B, 2B. - Ogando, J. (2007, October 8). A virtual hall of
shame. Design News, 62, 10.
12ReferencesMultimedia and Images
- The sounds in this presentation were provided by
powerpoint. - The picture on slide 1 provided by
- http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageKnatterboot.jpg
- http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImagePlaydoh.jpg
- The picture on slide 2 provided by
- http//www.mazm.com/2007/09/19/38.toys-manufacture
-in-china-25-pics.html - The pictures on slide 3 provided by
- http//www.amazon.com/Thomas-at-the-Station-Set/dp
/B00000ISOR - The picture on slide 5 provided by
- http//www.kidsindanger.org/aboutus/danny.asp
- The picture on slide 9 provided by
- http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageWalmart_exterio
r.jpg