Title: Compensation and rehabilitation in HPAI control programmes: issues and options (discussion with WB and UNSIC, 13-14 July 2006)
1Compensation and rehabilitation in HPAI control
programmes issues and options(discussion with
WB and UNSIC, 13-14 July 2006)
- Anni McLeod and Ana Riviere Cinnamond
- FAO Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal
Diseases (ECTAD)
2Overview
- The context
- A framework for thinking about compensation and
rehabilitation - Issues and options that have emerged so far
- Next steps
3(No Transcript)
4 5Increasing regulations raises market barriers for
small commercial producers. (Vietnam)
activities/linkages still
operating no longer operating
6 - The framework for thinking about compensation and
rehabilitation
7Framework around 5 questions....
- Why?
- Who?
- How much?
- How?
- From where?
8General principles.....
- Keep it practical
- Work off a simple framework
- Design locally, draw lessons globally
- Think beyond the emergency
- Changing the rules of the game takes time
9 - Issues that have emerged so far
10 11 - Issue1
- unless you are clear about what compensation is
and why it is being done, it is difficult to
build a coherent plan
12Reasons why countries consider compensation for
HPAI....
- Belief that compensation will encourage reporting
and discourage panic selling (not proved). Many
countries. - Wish to prevent a public health threat. Cote
DIvoire high density of people, live bird
markets. Vietnam a matter of principle, human
cases - Pressure from neighbours or international
organisations WBGS pressure from neighbour - Moral notion or stakeholder pressure that payment
should be made by the government for private
property destroyed in the public good. Held to
some extent in many countries....... Iraq laughed
13Reasons why countries consider compensation for
HPAI....
- Existence of an insurance fund, private or
public-private, to which people have contributed.
e.g. Australia. Few if any developing countries. - Support on social, humanitarian or political
grounds, to restore livelihoods or to
rehabilitate the poultry industry (depending on
stakeholder voice). Nigeria pressure from
stakeholders with high level of voice .
Thailand pressure from stakeholders, ??social
conscience. - Cambodia has firmly declared cannot afford
compensation
14We find it useful to distinguish between....
- Compensation by government Payment for private
property destroyed (birds culled) in the public
good - Indemnity from private sources Payment made to
people who have contributed to an insurance fund - Rehabilitation Support from public funds, on
social, humanitarian or political grounds, to
restore livelihoods or rehabilitate the poultry
industry (e.g. reimbursement for birds that died
of disease, payment for downtime, assistance to
restart poultry enterprise or move to other
enterprises) even when damage results from
externalities created by risky behaviour of
private individuals.
15 16 - Issue2
- what to do about people who have suffered from
HPAI outbreaks or control processes but will not
be eligible for compensation because their birds
were not culled?
17 - Compensation by government
- .... compensate everyone whose birds are culled
- In Vietnam, payments made for birds volunteered
for culling. - A problem, Backyard producers sometimes left out
of compulsory culling - Indemnity from private sources
- .... compensate people in the scheme
- limited examples in developing countries
18 - Rehabilitation
- .... the jury is still out
- .... payment for birds that died before the
culling team got there? (were sold? were eaten?) - ... payment for downtime?
- .... help to restart local poultry in a more
biosecure way? - .... help to start a different livelihoods
enterprise? - Strong interest in rehabilitation in
- Cote DIvoire and Nigeria strong poultry sector
- WBGS income source for many people, ?80 protein
from poultry possible rehabilitation through
microfinance - At risk countries are paying less attention to
this aspect, it only becomes important when they
have had an outbreak....... table top simulations
to stimulate interest
19 20 - Issue3
- it is difficult to establish (and implement) a
consistent strategy about compensation rates, or
other forms of support, in a decentralised
financing system
21Levels of support.....
- Compensation by government
- Same rate for same bird everywhere in the country
advisable (otherwise people move birds). More
difficult with decentralised decision making and
finance or very variable local prices.
Vietnam....... Across international borders...... - Different prices by species and category (age,
broiler or layer, traditional or commercial,
breeding flocks). Not too many categories or it
is hard to administer. Premium value on
traditional birds? The opposite in Cote
DIvoire.... discouraging to farmers.
22 - Based on of market price or, for commercial
poultry, production costs rather than market
price. Decide in advance how to determine market
price average for month or week? the price on
the day of culling? - Market prices as basis for establishing rates in
Mauritania, Vietnam, Cote DIvoire, Egypt??,
Nigeria, Thailand - Production costs as basis for commercial birds in
WBGS, Senegal, Benin, - Establishing market price in several countries,
average price for the month before the outbreak.
In EU, general principle is price on the day of
culling (incentive to report quickly). - Percentage of market price we recommend lt100.
Thailand, 70-100. Vietnam 30-50 in practice.
Cote DIvoire 75 suggested after stakeholder
negotiation. Iran, ?? compensated at 3x market
price for 3 weeks only (to encourage rapid
reporting)
23Levels of support....
- Indemnity from private sources
- payment level standardized or agreed in advance
24Levels of support.....
- Rehabilitation
- unlike compensation payments, process usually
decided after an outbreak, not in advance - agreed restocking packages? some interest in
Afgahnistan.... very tricky in Vietnam... - poultry development project with credit /
microfinance? associated with training / quality
management Crimea, UNDP - should consider including rehabilitation planning
and some operational work in emergency projects - Compensation may need to be entirely centrally
funded, rehabilitation funded from local sources
25 26 - Issue4
- may need very different financing and operational
processes - for compensation vs rehabilitation
- for situations where there is an existing food
emergency vs those where there is not - Issue5
- more evidence is needed on the best form of
payment, and the best balance of compensation vs
rehabilitation, for poor and vulnerable people - Issue6
- rehabilitation schemes may be highly beneficial
but they take time and expertise to establish
in the meantime, the future of smallholder
poultry development schemes are uncertain
27Identifying farmers and poultry
- Compensation by government
- Indemnity from private sources
- .... only pay for birds that are culled and
registered or part of an indemnity scheme - Registration forms, carbon copies, supervision of
culling and registration by veterinary services,
local authorities, poultry owner ( other?).... - does not entirely prevent scams
- needs to work fast or people will cull their own.
- Gender issues? Who gets registered?
28Where / by whom are payments made?
- Cheques
- Issued by the National bank, cashed upon
presentation of ID. Francophone Africa many
smallholders have bank accounts. - Cash
- Smallholders thought to like cash, but not
everywhere. Gender issues? Need a simple system
that makes use of existing institutions. In some
countries cash payments not possible through the
government. Authorities, NGOs, mosques. UN
agencies (refugee camps or relief areas). - Cheques or cash can be paid swiftly
- In-kind
- Food? only in cases of severe food insecurity
- Seeds? relief mechanism may exist for disbursement
29Identifying farmers and poultry
- Rehabilitation
- .... ideally, need advance registration
- but, Smallholders (even in UK, until
recently) not usually registered anywhere. Good
records may be available for contract farmers.
30Where / by whom are payments made?
- Poultry Mauritania suggested compensate with
birds, Vietnam has restocking scheme
(problematic) (i) risky in epidemiological terms,
(ii) direct restocking by government is
difficult, (iii) farmers might prefer to invest
in other areas. Requires investment in a
restocking/poultry development programme. - Other things e.g. help to get into non-poultry
enterprises Vietnam restructuring plan could send
2 million smallholders out of poultry.
Examples??.
31 32 - Issue7
- where there is no money a widespread outbreak
may result in a hefty compensation bill for a
poor country and decisions to do things
differently next time under what circumstances
is international financing appropriate?
33Sources of finance..
- Compensation by government
- Taxes.... general or earmarked? General taxes
used by many countries that have a compensation
scheme... but fund may not be quickly accessible.
FAO reports estimate available tax - With a well organised private sector, can set up
a fund for livestock emergencies, to which
government and private sector contribute.
Encourages reporting, helps insure against
losses, shares the financial risk so that all
take steps to reduce disease risk. e,g,
Australia. - Top up from regional economic group (e.g. EU)
- International sources... will require careful
review of auditing process
34Sources of finance..
- Indemnity from private sources
- Commercial farmers who take out private insurance
will probably be asked to join a quality
management scheme - Rehabilitation
- A variety of sources for rural development
35 36 37 38Immediate plans.....
- Support to more countries on request to include
compensation and rehabilitation in HPAI control
plans - Lessons learned e-consultation August
- Prepare workshop
- Refine generic guidelines
- Put compensation into table-top simulations
- Issues and options publication
- Collaboration..... World Bank, USDA....