Title: Addressing health inequalities in England: Implementing policies across central government
1Addressing health inequalities in England
Implementing policies across central government
- Don Nutbeam
- Head of Public Health
- Department of Health
2Acheson Inquiry Key headlines
- Overall progress in health has not improved the
gap in health status between rich and poor - Although average mortality has fallen over the
past 50 years, unacceptable inequalities in
health persist. For many measures of health
inequalities have either remained the same or
have widened in recent decades. - Inequalities can be observed throughout the
lifespan - These inequalities affect the whole of society
and they can be identified at all stages of the
life course from pregnancy to old age.. - Inequalities can be observed across a range of
social indicators - Inequalities by socioeconomic group, ethnic group
and gender can be demonstrated across a wide
range of measures of health and the determinants
of health. - Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health,
1998 (www.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/ih
/contents/htm)
3The Acheson Inquiry ReportKey Recommendations
on actions required to address health inequalities
- All policies likely to have an impact on health
should be evaluated. - Families with children should be a priority.
- Reduce income inequalities and improve the living
standards of poor households - Major gains will be derived from those health
problems which occur most frequently - Policies which improve average health may have no
impact on inequalities
4Tackling health inequalities policy context
- Saving Lives - Our Healthier Nation (1999)
establishes public health policy for England,
overtly cross-government, supports partnership
between individuals, communities and government
(www.doh.gov.uk.ohn.htm) - The NHS Plan commitments (July 2000) bringing
substantial new investment for a modernised NHS,
chapter on Health Inequalities focussed on public
health interventions, access to services and
distribution of benefit of new investment.
(www.doh.gov.uk/nhsplan) - Announcement of two national health inequalities
targets (February 2001)
5Targets to reduce health inequalities
- National health inequalities targets
- Starting with children under one year, by 2010 to
reduce by at least 10 per cent the gap in
mortality between manual groups and the
population as a whole. - Starting with Health Authorities, by 2010 to
reduce by at least 10 per cent the gap between
the fifth of areas with the lowest life
expectancy at birth and the population as a
whole. - Simplified in new DoH Public Service Agreement
as - By 2010 reduce inequalities in health outcomes by
10 as measured by infant mortality and life
expectancy at birth
6Much action has been taken and resources released
(albeit not always joined up)
- Tax and welfare reform to reduce poverty
- National Service Frameworks intended to level
up health service access and quality - Health Action Zones direct resources to
partnership working in disadvantaged communities - Neighbourhood renewal strategy - to address
complex causes and effects of disadvantage - Fuel poverty strategy directed at vulnerable
individuals and families - Investment in early years development
(Sure-start) and educational attainment
7CHANGE IN INCOME FOR RICH AND POOR UK BUDGETS
1997-2002
Gain/Loss income
Poorest 10
Richest 10
Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2000 (updated 2002)
(http//www.ifs.org.uk/taxben/fiscalreform.pdf)
8From analysis to action Consultation on a plan
for delivery
- Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
plan for delivery (http//www.doh.gov.uk/healthine
qualities/tacklinghealthinequalities.)
9Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
plan for delivery
- Key results Some strengths
- recognition of the complexity of the problem and
its solution - especially the links to
regeneration - national targets and identified priority areas
recognised and welcomed - strong support for action taken so far and need
for sustained action in the future - legitimising
effect of activity
10Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
plan for delivery
- Key results Some challenges
- continuing gaps in the evidence and in its
application - fragility of local government and health systems
as the foundation for action - greater consolidation/co-ordination of activities
needed - missing vulnerable groups and critical issues -
eg black and ethnic minority groups, older
people, disabled people, mental health
11Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities
- Led by Treasury, technical support provided by
Department of Health - Focus on effectiveness of spending on
services/programme across government on
addressing the causes of health inequalities, or
alleviating their effects - Leading to binding proposals for modified and new
spending for the period 2003-7 across most
government departments
12Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities - use of evidence
- Acheson review findings re-examined by
independent academics who conclude that they
remain relevant and broadly accurate - Apparent inverse relationship between volume and
quality of evidence and potential effectiveness
of interventions (evidence on upstream
interventions particularly light) - Social gradient not well understood (pressures
for universal progress and addressing social
exclusion remain key drivers in government) - Analysis of relative costs and benefits of
different forms of intervention very patchy.
13Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities
- Considerable existing activity that is not
necessarily labelled as addressing health
inequalities - need for greater coherence and
continuity - Tendency to see activities as marginal add-ons -
challenge to influence the mainstream services
and programmes of government departments
(including and especially NHS) - Key challenges to bend mainstream services,
supplemented by dedicated programmes and services
to address specific local need
14Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities - key themes
- 1. Breaking the cycle of health inequalities -
addressing poverty, especially in families with
children, healthy pregnancy, early childhood
development (Sure-start), and educational
interventions to close the attainment gap - 2. Tackling the major killers - addressing the
social gradient in modifiable behavioral and
physiological risks, and in treatment service
provision
15Key themes cont.
- 3. Improving access to public services and
facilities - addressing the inverse care and
provision law, especially in relation to
primary care, and public transport - 4. Strengthening disadvantaged communities -
working with the grain of neighbourhood
renewal, and regeneration strategies - improving
housing, creating a safe environment, engaging
public services in employment and education - 5. Reaching vulnerable groups - working with the
grain of social exclusion strategies to address
the needs of fuel poor, mentally ill, rough
sleepers, and prisoners and their families.
16Using structures and resources to create an
effective system for co-ordination and delivery
- At national level a cross-Department group of
senior officials chaired by Treasury, and
accountable to a Cabinet sub-Committee of
Ministers for implementation of Delivery Plan
DA(SER) - NHS and Cross-government Delivery Plan structured
around long-term targets to reduce the gap in
health status between social groups and
geographical areas
17Creating an effective system for co-ordination
and delivery
- At local level short to medium term targets for
NHS (PPF) and local government (PSA) - Publication of NHS performance and planning
framework (Oct 2002) has embedded inequalities in
the mainstream of NHS business - Development of evidence-based standards for
practice, supported by system for dissemination
and workforce development (Health Development
Agency)
18Providing a lead Key NHS interventions to reduce
gap in infant mortality
- Reduce teenage pregnancies
- Improving maternity services to secure early
booking, attendance at ante-natal education - Reduce smoking, improve nutrition in pregnancy
- Increase breast feeding initiation and duration
- Provision of early development support (including
SIDS prevention) - link to Sure Start - See - Improvement, Expansion and Reform the next
three years - Priorities and Planning Framework
2003-2006 (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006
/index.htm)
19Providing a lead Key NHS interventions to reduce
gap in life expectancy
- Reduce smoking in manual groups
- Strengthen primary care in disadvantaged/
under-served areas to ensure improvement in
capacity for prevention, early detection and
treatment of disease - focus on hypertension and
obesity - Reduce excess winter deaths by achieving flu
immunisation and full contribution to fuel
poverty strategy - (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006/index.htm
)
20Improvement, Expansion and Reform NHS Priorities
2003-2006
- NHS improvement, expansion and reform should
narrow the health gap by - ensuring that the distribution of health benefit
from service expansion and development
consistently favours individuals and communities
that have been traditionally under-served, - ensuring that service planning is informed by an
equity audit and supported by an annual public
health report by the Director of Public Health, - (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006/index.htm
)
21Improvement, Expansion and Reform NHS Priorities
2003-2006
- NHS improvement, expansion and reform should
narrow the health gap by - tackling the wider determinants of health -
agreeing a single set of local priorities with
local authorities and other partners,
contributing to regeneration and neighbourhood
renewal programmes, and ensuring the NHS makes a
full contribution to support the Sure Start
programme - building capacity for public health improvement
and protection in PCTs(http//www.doh.gov.uk/plan
ning2003-2006/index.htm)
22Concluding remarks
- Much progress has been made in getting the
policies right, and aligned - Acheson Inquiry Report, Saving Lives - OHN, NHS
Plan provide policy context - Consultation on a plan for delivery added
experience and intuition to existing evidence - Cross-government Spending Review attempts to
bring comprehensiveness and coherence - backed by
resource commitments - Current finalisation of a Delivery Plan
specifying what, who and how much
23Concluding remarks
- Challenge is now to get funding and performance
assessment/management systems (NHS, LPSAs etc)
aligned to policy goals within culture of
decentralised decision-making - Maintain coherence within central government and
foster local joining up - Build capacity for effective local action