Addressing health inequalities in England: Implementing policies across central government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Addressing health inequalities in England: Implementing policies across central government

Description:

'Although average mortality has fallen over the past 50 years, unacceptable ... etc) aligned to policy goals within culture of decentralised decision-making ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: OIS391
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Addressing health inequalities in England: Implementing policies across central government


1
Addressing health inequalities in England
Implementing policies across central government
  • Don Nutbeam
  • Head of Public Health
  • Department of Health

2
Acheson Inquiry Key headlines
  • Overall progress in health has not improved the
    gap in health status between rich and poor
  • Although average mortality has fallen over the
    past 50 years, unacceptable inequalities in
    health persist. For many measures of health
    inequalities have either remained the same or
    have widened in recent decades.
  • Inequalities can be observed throughout the
    lifespan
  • These inequalities affect the whole of society
    and they can be identified at all stages of the
    life course from pregnancy to old age..
  • Inequalities can be observed across a range of
    social indicators
  • Inequalities by socioeconomic group, ethnic group
    and gender can be demonstrated across a wide
    range of measures of health and the determinants
    of health.
  • Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health,
    1998 (www.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/ih
    /contents/htm)

3
The Acheson Inquiry ReportKey Recommendations
on actions required to address health inequalities
  • All policies likely to have an impact on health
    should be evaluated.
  • Families with children should be a priority.
  • Reduce income inequalities and improve the living
    standards of poor households
  • Major gains will be derived from those health
    problems which occur most frequently
  • Policies which improve average health may have no
    impact on inequalities

4
Tackling health inequalities policy context
  • Saving Lives - Our Healthier Nation (1999)
    establishes public health policy for England,
    overtly cross-government, supports partnership
    between individuals, communities and government
    (www.doh.gov.uk.ohn.htm)
  • The NHS Plan commitments (July 2000) bringing
    substantial new investment for a modernised NHS,
    chapter on Health Inequalities focussed on public
    health interventions, access to services and
    distribution of benefit of new investment.
    (www.doh.gov.uk/nhsplan)
  • Announcement of two national health inequalities
    targets (February 2001)

5
Targets to reduce health inequalities
  • National health inequalities targets
  • Starting with children under one year, by 2010 to
    reduce by at least 10 per cent the gap in
    mortality between manual groups and the
    population as a whole.
  • Starting with Health Authorities, by 2010 to
    reduce by at least 10 per cent the gap between
    the fifth of areas with the lowest life
    expectancy at birth and the population as a
    whole.
  • Simplified in new DoH Public Service Agreement
    as
  • By 2010 reduce inequalities in health outcomes by
    10 as measured by infant mortality and life
    expectancy at birth

6
Much action has been taken and resources released
(albeit not always joined up)
  • Tax and welfare reform to reduce poverty
  • National Service Frameworks intended to level
    up health service access and quality
  • Health Action Zones direct resources to
    partnership working in disadvantaged communities
  • Neighbourhood renewal strategy - to address
    complex causes and effects of disadvantage
  • Fuel poverty strategy directed at vulnerable
    individuals and families
  • Investment in early years development
    (Sure-start) and educational attainment

7
CHANGE IN INCOME FOR RICH AND POOR UK BUDGETS
1997-2002
Gain/Loss income
Poorest 10
Richest 10
Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2000 (updated 2002)
(http//www.ifs.org.uk/taxben/fiscalreform.pdf)
8
From analysis to action Consultation on a plan
for delivery
  • Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
    plan for delivery (http//www.doh.gov.uk/healthine
    qualities/tacklinghealthinequalities.)

9
Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
plan for delivery
  • Key results Some strengths
  • recognition of the complexity of the problem and
    its solution - especially the links to
    regeneration
  • national targets and identified priority areas
    recognised and welcomed
  • strong support for action taken so far and need
    for sustained action in the future - legitimising
    effect of activity

10
Tackling Health Inequalities - Consultation on a
plan for delivery
  • Key results Some challenges
  • continuing gaps in the evidence and in its
    application
  • fragility of local government and health systems
    as the foundation for action
  • greater consolidation/co-ordination of activities
    needed
  • missing vulnerable groups and critical issues -
    eg black and ethnic minority groups, older
    people, disabled people, mental health

11
Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities
  • Led by Treasury, technical support provided by
    Department of Health
  • Focus on effectiveness of spending on
    services/programme across government on
    addressing the causes of health inequalities, or
    alleviating their effects
  • Leading to binding proposals for modified and new
    spending for the period 2003-7 across most
    government departments

12
Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities - use of evidence
  • Acheson review findings re-examined by
    independent academics who conclude that they
    remain relevant and broadly accurate
  • Apparent inverse relationship between volume and
    quality of evidence and potential effectiveness
    of interventions (evidence on upstream
    interventions particularly light)
  • Social gradient not well understood (pressures
    for universal progress and addressing social
    exclusion remain key drivers in government)
  • Analysis of relative costs and benefits of
    different forms of intervention very patchy.

13
Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities
  • Considerable existing activity that is not
    necessarily labelled as addressing health
    inequalities - need for greater coherence and
    continuity
  • Tendency to see activities as marginal add-ons -
    challenge to influence the mainstream services
    and programmes of government departments
    (including and especially NHS)
  • Key challenges to bend mainstream services,
    supplemented by dedicated programmes and services
    to address specific local need

14
Cross-cutting spending review on health
inequalities - key themes
  • 1. Breaking the cycle of health inequalities -
    addressing poverty, especially in families with
    children, healthy pregnancy, early childhood
    development (Sure-start), and educational
    interventions to close the attainment gap
  • 2. Tackling the major killers - addressing the
    social gradient in modifiable behavioral and
    physiological risks, and in treatment service
    provision

15
Key themes cont.
  • 3. Improving access to public services and
    facilities - addressing the inverse care and
    provision law, especially in relation to
    primary care, and public transport
  • 4. Strengthening disadvantaged communities -
    working with the grain of neighbourhood
    renewal, and regeneration strategies - improving
    housing, creating a safe environment, engaging
    public services in employment and education
  • 5. Reaching vulnerable groups - working with the
    grain of social exclusion strategies to address
    the needs of fuel poor, mentally ill, rough
    sleepers, and prisoners and their families.

16
Using structures and resources to create an
effective system for co-ordination and delivery
  • At national level a cross-Department group of
    senior officials chaired by Treasury, and
    accountable to a Cabinet sub-Committee of
    Ministers for implementation of Delivery Plan
    DA(SER)
  • NHS and Cross-government Delivery Plan structured
    around long-term targets to reduce the gap in
    health status between social groups and
    geographical areas

17
Creating an effective system for co-ordination
and delivery
  • At local level short to medium term targets for
    NHS (PPF) and local government (PSA)
  • Publication of NHS performance and planning
    framework (Oct 2002) has embedded inequalities in
    the mainstream of NHS business
  • Development of evidence-based standards for
    practice, supported by system for dissemination
    and workforce development (Health Development
    Agency)

18
Providing a lead Key NHS interventions to reduce
gap in infant mortality
  • Reduce teenage pregnancies
  • Improving maternity services to secure early
    booking, attendance at ante-natal education
  • Reduce smoking, improve nutrition in pregnancy
  • Increase breast feeding initiation and duration
  • Provision of early development support (including
    SIDS prevention) - link to Sure Start
  • See - Improvement, Expansion and Reform the next
    three years - Priorities and Planning Framework
    2003-2006 (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006
    /index.htm)

19
Providing a lead Key NHS interventions to reduce
gap in life expectancy
  • Reduce smoking in manual groups
  • Strengthen primary care in disadvantaged/
    under-served areas to ensure improvement in
    capacity for prevention, early detection and
    treatment of disease - focus on hypertension and
    obesity
  • Reduce excess winter deaths by achieving flu
    immunisation and full contribution to fuel
    poverty strategy
  • (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006/index.htm
    )

20
Improvement, Expansion and Reform NHS Priorities
2003-2006
  • NHS improvement, expansion and reform should
    narrow the health gap by
  • ensuring that the distribution of health benefit
    from service expansion and development
    consistently favours individuals and communities
    that have been traditionally under-served,
  • ensuring that service planning is informed by an
    equity audit and supported by an annual public
    health report by the Director of Public Health,
  • (http//www.doh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006/index.htm
    )

21
Improvement, Expansion and Reform NHS Priorities
2003-2006
  • NHS improvement, expansion and reform should
    narrow the health gap by
  • tackling the wider determinants of health -
    agreeing a single set of local priorities with
    local authorities and other partners,
    contributing to regeneration and neighbourhood
    renewal programmes, and ensuring the NHS makes a
    full contribution to support the Sure Start
    programme
  • building capacity for public health improvement
    and protection in PCTs(http//www.doh.gov.uk/plan
    ning2003-2006/index.htm)

22
Concluding remarks
  • Much progress has been made in getting the
    policies right, and aligned
  • Acheson Inquiry Report, Saving Lives - OHN, NHS
    Plan provide policy context
  • Consultation on a plan for delivery added
    experience and intuition to existing evidence
  • Cross-government Spending Review attempts to
    bring comprehensiveness and coherence - backed by
    resource commitments
  • Current finalisation of a Delivery Plan
    specifying what, who and how much

23
Concluding remarks
  • Challenge is now to get funding and performance
    assessment/management systems (NHS, LPSAs etc)
    aligned to policy goals within culture of
    decentralised decision-making
  • Maintain coherence within central government and
    foster local joining up
  • Build capacity for effective local action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com