3' Quantum Mechanics and Vector Spaces - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

3' Quantum Mechanics and Vector Spaces

Description:

We can produce interference between different components of a quantum state, e.g. ... self-adjoint ops represent things disallowed by superselection' e.g. real ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: paddy2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 3' Quantum Mechanics and Vector Spaces


1
3. Quantum Mechanics and Vector Spaces
  • 3.1 Physics of Quantum mechanics
  • Principle of superposition
  • Measurements
  • 3.2 Redundant mathematical structure
  • 3.3 Time evolution
  • The Schrödinger equation
  • Time evolution operator
  • Example Nuclear magnetic resonance

2
3.1.1 Principle of Superposition
  • We can produce interference between different
    components of a quantum state, e.g.
  • Two-slit experiment
  • photons, electrons, buckyballs (C60)
  • Bragg diffraction interference between particles
    reflected from different planes in a crystal
  • Photons, electrons, neutrons, H2 molecules
  • Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices
    (SQUIDS) interference between electric currents
    travelling around loop in opposite directions.
  • The most beautiful experiment in physics
  • according to Physics World readers (2002)

Credit Tonomura et al, Hitachi Corp.
3
Interference experiments
??
??
SG-x
??
SG z
f
??
??
Feynman thought experiment
  • Destructive interference ? genuine wave-like
    superposition, not just addition of
    probabilities.
  • Interference pattern depends on both relative
    amplitude and phase difference between
    components ? represent as complex amplitude.
  • Interference always seen whenever theory predicts
    it should be detectable.
  • ? Physical states can be added and multiplied by
    complex numbers, i.e. they have the structure of
    a vector space.

4
Why not stick with wave functions?
  • Dont take vector too seriously
  • its a metaphor
  • Really a general theory of superposables
  • So you can always think of waves instead if that
    helps.
  • Often were interested in quantum numbers, not
    the wave pattern vector approach avoids
    calculating wave functions when not needed.
  • Wave function picture incomplete
  • If you know ?(r) you know everything about
  • position, momentum, KE, orbital angular momentum
  • but nothing about spin ( other more obscure
    quantities)
  • Vector space allows us to easily include spin.

5
3.1.2 Measurements
  • Only certain results found in quantum
    measurement
  • some quantities quantized (ang. mom., atomic
    energy levels)
  • some continuous (position, momentum of a free
    particle).
  • We can prepare quantum states that will
    definitely give
  • any allowed result for a quantized observable
  • an arbitrarily small spread for continuous
    observables.
  • ? There is something there to measure.

6
Measurement (continued)
??
SG-z
SG z
Ag
??
  • If we superpose definite states of a given
    observable, measure the same observable, we
    randomly get one of the superposed valuesnever
    an intermediate result.
  • Probability of result a, Prob(a) ? amplitude2
    in superposition.
  • We always get some result ? Probs 1.

7
Mathematical model
  • Represent states of definite results
    (eigenstates) as a set of orthonormal basis
    vectors.
  • Represent physical states as normalised vectors.
  • Probability amplitude for result ai from state ?
    ci ?ai ? ?.
  • zero amplitude to get anything but ai in
    definite ai state.
  • Use projectors instead, if degenerate.
  • General state can always be decomposed into a
    superposition

8
Mathematical model
  • Represent states of definite results
    (eigenstates) as a set of orthonormal basis
    vectors.
  • Represent physical states as normalised vectors.
  • Probability amplitude for result ai from state ?
    ci ?ai ? ?.
  • zero amplitude to get anything but ai in
    definite ai state.
  • Use projectors instead, if degenerate.
  • General state can always be decomposed into a
    superposition
  • Sum of probabilities 1 is Pythagoras rule in
    N-D vector space!

9
3.2 Redundant Mathematical Structure
  • A mathematical model for a physical process may
    contain things that dont have any physical
    meaning.
  • e.g. in electromagnetism, vector potential is
    undetermined up to a gauge change A ? A ??
  • Bad thing? May make the maths much easier!
  • In QM, physical states are represented by
    normalised vectors
  • Ambiguous up to factor of ei?, i.e. ? ? and
    ei?? ? represent the same state.
  • Normalised vectors do not make a vector
    spacemaths requires vectors of all lengths.
  • Really, physical state equivalent to a ray
    through the origin normalisation is a convention
    as we could write
  • Vectors of a particular length phase needed
    when analysing a vector into a superposition.

10
Redundancy (continued)
  • Hilbert space includes unphysical vectors
  • all those with infinite energy, i.e. outside the
    domain of the energy operator, H, (e.g.
    discontinuous wave functions).
  • Should other operators (x ? p ?) have finite
    expected values?
  • Perhaps a good reason for ignoring Hilbert space
    as such!
  • Do all possible self-adjoint operators represent
    physical observables?
  • In practice, no we only need a few dozen.
  • In theory, no some self-adjoint ops represent
    things disallowed by superselection e.g. real
    particles are either bosons or fermions, not some
    mixture.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com