Efficient Geographic Routing for Mobile Adhoc Networks Joint work with Xiaojing Xiang

1
Efficient Geographic Routing for Mobile Ad-hoc
Networks(Joint work with Xiaojing Xiang)

• Xin Wang
• Assistant Professor
• Director, Wireless and Networking Systems Lab
  (WINS)
• SUNY, Stony Brook
• http//www.ece.sunysb.edu/xwang

2
Future - Common Network, Common
Applications

3G CellularNetworks
RadioController

AccessRouter
UrbanNetworks

• Outdoor Areas
• High Mobility

AggregationRouter

• Broadband Distribution Networks
• High Speed Pico Cells
• Broadband
• Wireless

Presence
EnterpriseNetworks
Location
AccessRouter

• 802.11
• Local Mobility
• Packet Voice
• High Data Rates

Core InternetBackbone
AggregationRouter
AggregationRouter
Authentication

HomeNetworks
Emerging Techniques

AccessRouter

• DSL/Cable
• Community
• wireless
• networks

Ad HocNetworks

• Personal area
• Sensors
• Actuators

• Allow Peer-to-Peer Communications
• Self Configuring

4GRadios
3
Talk Overview

• Background and motivation
• Part I Self-adaptive geographic unicast routing
• Part II Scalable geographic multicast routing
• On-going and future work

4
Background

• Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET)
• Routing find a packet delivery path
• Unicast one-to-one
• Multicast one-to-many or manyto-many

5
Challenges of MANET Routing

• Host mobility leads to dynamic topology rate of
  link failure/repair increases with moving speed
• Topology and routing path maintenance become more
  difficult with the increase of path length and
  node density
• Mobile devices have very limited energy, and
  small devices such as sensors have very limited
  per-node resources

6
Unicast Routing
Reactive
Geographic
Proactive
(GPSR, GFG)
(DSR, AODV, TORA, FLR)
(DSDV, OLSR)
Hybrid
(ZRP, SHARP)
7
Information Required for Geographic Routing

• A nodes own position obtained through
  positioning service such as GPS

• The position of the destination determined
  through location service

• The positions of all neighbors learned through
  periodic beacons sent by neighbors

8
Forwarding Formats

• Greedy forwarding
• Make local optimal forwarding
  decision

D
x
9
Issues with Classical Geographic Routing

• Inaccurate knowledge of local and destination
  position
• Large delivery latency
• More Collisions
• Routing failure

• Fixed parameter setting
• Not optimal in different environment

10
Talk Overview

• Background and motivation
• Part I Self-adaptive geographic unicast routing
• Part II Scalable geographic multicast routing
• On-going and future work

11
Our Contributions

• Propose two self-adaptive routing protocols

BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing
On demand Alleviate unnecessary overhead due
to proactive beacons
More flexible position distribution More
updated topology, more efficient routing and
less failure
Adaptive parameter setting Environment,
traffic, user requirement
Route optimization According to topology,
Traffic demand

12
Effect of Outdate Topology

• Positions obtained may become outdated
• A mobile may move out of neighbors transmission
  range.
• Analysis assumptions
• B sends beacons periodically to refresh its
  position
• Neighbor area of A centered at A, within
  transmission range R
• Moving area of B centered at B, within r

13
Different Scenarios
R
R
r
z
z
A
B
R
r
A
B
z
B
A
r
Same as this case
14
Probability of Moving Out of Range
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
15
Probability of the mobile moving out-of-range
(expressed in percentages)
Timeout
16
Proposed Geographic Routing Protocols

• BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
• BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing

17
Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing (BIGR)

• There is no beacon, routing path is built
  on-demand

• Route searching phase
• Route optimization phase

D
x
How to find next hop without positions of
neighbors?
18
Proposed Geographic Routing Protocols

• BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
• Route searching
• Route optimization
• BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing

19
How to find next hop?

• When a node (C) does not have next hop
  information, broadcast REQ

S
E
F
B
M
L
C
J
A
G
H
D
I
K
N
Within neighborhood
A node that receives a packet for the first time
REQ message with
20
Forwarding Node Selection

• Reply sending nodes closer to destination
  respond after a competition delay delay is
  smaller for a node closer to destination

• Reply suppression a node cancels its reply if it
  overhears packet forwarding, or overhears reply
  sent by node closer to destination

• Multiple replies select the node closer to the
  destination as next hop

S
E
F
B
M
L
C
J
A
G
H
D
I
K
N
REPLY message
21
Packet Sending

• Cs next hop table

S
E
F
B
M
L
C
J
A
G
H
D
I
K
N
22
Recovery from Local Void

• Without local topology, cannot use perimeter
  forwarding. How to recover?

• Broadcast REQ to N-hop neighbors

F
E
S
B
M
C
L
J
A
D
H
I
K
G
N
REQ message with
23
Finding Path in Recovery Mode

• Reply sending

• If one-hop neighbor is nearer to destination, it
  replies with Hop 1 Otherwise continues
  broadcasting REQ
• A two-hop neighbor nearer to destination replies
  (reverse path), Hop 2

• Reply suppression drop the REPLY if having
  forwarded/overhead one from the node closer to
  destination

• Multiple replies select the node closer to
  destination

F
E
S
B
M
C
L
J
Reply message
D
H
I
K
G
24
Proposed Geographic Routing Protocols

• BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
• Route searching
• Route optimization
• BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing

25
Position Update and Route Optimization

• Update next hop position when overhearing packet
  forwarding by next hop

• Validate next hop

Old position
Next hop
New position
Route searching
Invalid
Outdated

• Optimize routing path three cases

26
Case 1 A is the destination

• As A is the destination, B should send packet
  directly to A, so A sends CORRECT to B

A
B
C

• B sets its next hop to A

27
Case 2 Greedy Mode Forwarding
A
F

• If A is closer to F than C is to F, A sends
  CORRECT to B

B
C

• B compares As and Cs positions to F, and sets
  its next hop to A if it is closer to F

Greedy
28
Case 3 Recovery Forwarding
F

• If A is closer to F than B and C are to F , A
  sends CORRECT to B

A
D
B

• B compares A and Cs positions relative to F, if
  A is closer to F, B sets its next hop to A

C
Recovery mode
Greedy

• If B is the first hop of recovery, change mode to
  greedy

29
Proposed Geographic Routing Protocols

• BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
• BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing

30
Position Distribution and Path Finding

• Position distribution through beacons
• Packet forwarding greedy, perimeter

• Beacon generation triggered by data traffic and
  route optimization

• Topology maintenance positions of neighbors

31
Route Optimization

• Route validation
• Delete invalid neighbors
• Update the positions of other members based on
  estimation
• Route optimization also three cases
• The first two cases are
  similar to those of BIGR
• Case 3
• If A is closer to the destination
  than where the perimeter
  mode started, broadcasts a beacon

D
F
A
O
Greedy
B
Perimeter
C
Perimeter
32
Performance Impact of Mobility

• Delivery ratio Control
  overhead

33
Performance Impact of Mobility (cont)
Transmission inefficiency Average end-to-end
delay
Our protocols have significantly lower
transmission redundancy and end-to-end delay than
GPSR due to more updated topology.
34
Summary of Unicast

• Propose two self-adaptive on-demand geographic
  routing protocols

Adapt protocol parameter setting for improved
performance
Efficiently distribute position to update
topology timely and on demand
Optimize routing path according to traffic
patterns and topology change
35
Talk Overview

• Background and motivation
• Part I Self-adaptive geographic unicast routing
• Part II Scalable geographic multicast routing
• On-going and future work

36
Multicast Routing
Tree-based
Mesh-based
Geographic
(AMRIS, MAODV, LAM)
(FGMP, CAMP, ODMRP)
(LGT, DSM, PBM)

• Only consider forwarding
• Not scalable

Difficult to scale due to overhead for route
searching, group membership management, and
tree/mesh maintenance over dynamic topology
37
Why Is Geographic Multicast Difficult to Scale?

• Putting the information of all group members into
  packet header creates excessive overhead for
  large group

• Relying on location service to obtain positions
  for all group members adds more overhead

38
Our Contributions

• Propose scalable geographic multicast routing
  protocol
• (SGMP)

Designs on-demand hierarchical group membership
management scheme
Uses geographic forwarding to avoid building and
maintaining tree/mesh structure
Introduces the home zone to avoid periodical
network-range flooding of source information
Combines group membership management with
location service to avoid location searches for
all group members

39
Terms Used in the Scalable Multicast (SGMP)
40
High Level Picture
RFRESH (Join)
REPORT (Join)
DATA
41
Source Announcements

• At session initiation time floods an ANNOUNCE,
  with address, position, and group ID
• During packet transmissions piggybacks its
  position with the multicast packets

42
Home Zone Management
Home zone searching
Home zone update
Home zone SEQ 1
Home zone SEQ 0
Home zone election
43
Membership Management within Zone

• A member
• A leader

• Sends REFRESH to leader (periodically, join,
  leave), carrying its membership and position

• Floods LEADER periodically within the zone,
  carrying its own position and the positions and
  group IDs of the multicast members

44
Membership Management at Upper Tier

• Source records the member zones

Leader knows source location
Membership report
SOURCE message
Home Zone
Leader does not know source location or Source
information is outdated
45
How to Handle Movement between Zones?

• When a node moves into a new zone
• Clears old zones information
• If the node is a group member
• Will continue receiving packets forwarded by old
  zone
• Sends next REFRESH to new zone leader
• When a leader is moving out of a zone
• Hands leadership to other nodes

46
Empty Zone Problem
47
How to Handle Empty Zone ?
Home zone searching
Home zone update
Member zone empty
Home zone Empty SEQ 1
48
Multicast Packet Delivery

• Source
• Sends packets to all member zones and members in
  its zone
• Sends one copy if several members share next hop

• Intermediate nodes
• Take similar action
• Replace the ID of its current Zone with the
  information of the members in the zone.

Source
Zone leader
Group member
Other nodes
49
Performance Impact of mobility

• Delivery ratio Control overhead

50
Performance Scalability
Group size Network size
51
Summary of Multicast

• Design a scalable geographic multicast routing
  scheme

Performance scalable in terms of group size,
number of groups, and network range, and robust
to topology change
52
On-going Projects

• Cross-Layer optimization and integration of
  network infrastructure
• Develop key understanding of the cross-layer
  interactions, and design more scalable, reliable
  and adaptive networking system.

Cooperative resource management for IP-based
Wireless Access Network
Power control and energy efficiency for MANET
INFOCOM04 INFOCOM05
INFOCOM03 INFOCOM04 JSAC05 TMC05
NSF
NIJ
53
On-going Projects (cont)

• Next Generation Mobile Wireless Network
  Infrastructure and Service
• Development of network infrastructure and
  services over emerging radio and computing
  technologies.

Scalable and resilient wireless mesh network
Context-aware mobile computing and services
Programmable wireless networking and service
infrastructure design
Sensor network applications and Services

• Architecture and Design for Heterogeneous Networks

54

Q A
55
Issues with Classical Geographic Routing
Proactive fixed-interval beaconing for positions
Difficulty in beaconing Interval setup
Continuous retransmission
Too short consume energy and create collisions
Reduce throughput and fairness
Generate unnecessary overhead and consume energy
Too long outdated topology
Create collisions with normal data transmissions
Further delay and energy consumption
Non-optimal routing, transmission failure
More resource consumption
56
Possible Performance Improvement

• Change Beacon Sending Interval
• Send out beacons only after moving a certain
  distance
• Send beacons more frequently, e.g. piggyback
  position with packets (Are the sending nodes the
  best next hop? )

Does not consider traffic conditions. May
generate unnecessary beacons.

• Do not use Beacons (CBF03, BLR04)
• Focus only on finding the next hop for greedy
  forwarding, and there is no recovery strategy
• Do not have a good strategy to use the path
  detected or perform any route optimization.

57
Performance Studies

• Setup
• Tool GlomoSim
• Network size 3000 m x 1000 m, 300 nodes
• Traffic 30 CBR with rate 8kbps each
• Mobility model Random Waypoint
• Measures
• Packet delivery ratio
• The ratio of packets delivered to those
  originated by the source
• Control overhead
• The number of control messages over the number of
  packets received
• Average number of data packet transmissions
• The total number of packet transmissions
  accumulated from each hop over the total number
  of packets received
• Average end-to-end delay
• Average time interval for packets to traverse
  from source to destination

58
Route Searching

• After a route searching, a node keeps a record
  for next hop (for node B)

Next-hop position
A
Network node
Forwarding node
F
Destination
Next Hop
B
C
59
SGMP Basic Principles
Join
Join
(RERESH)
(REPORT)
Zone Leader
Member
Source
Data
Data
Member Zone
Member
Source
Packet sending geographic unicasting, and the
packet for a zone is sent towards the zone
center.
60
Performance Number of groups

• Delivery ratio Overhead

61
Home Zone Election

• When a node receives a message carrying home zone
  ID different from that in its record
• If the message has larger sequence number,
  update its home zone info otherwise, forward the
  message to recorded home zone

Home Zone SEQ 0
Membership report
SOURCE message
Home Zone SEQ 1
62
Impact of node density
63
Impact of node density (cont)
64
Impact of traffic load
65
Impact of traffic load (cont)
66
Performance Impact of node density
67
Existing Unicast Routing Protocols

• Proactive protocols (DSDV, OLSR)
• Maintain routes continuously, large overhead
• Actively track network topology, not suitable for
  high mobility

• Reactive protocols (DSR, AODV, TORA, FLR)
• Maintain routes only if needed
• Flooding to discover routes, larger delay due to
  searching

• Hybrid protocols (ZRP, SHARP)
• Combine the proactive and reactive approaches

• Geographic routing protocols (GPSR, GFG)
• Make use of location information to reduce
  routing overhead
• Only need to be aware of local topology

68
Performance Impact of node density
69
Overhead
Group size
Network size
70
Impact of the number of groups

• Delivery ratio Overhead

71
Tomorrow Common Net, Common Apps

3G CellularNetworks
RadioController

AccessRouter
UrbanNetworks

• Outdoor Areas
• High Mobility

AggregationRouter

• Broadband Distribution Networks
• High Speed Pico Cells

Presence
EnterpriseNetworks
Location
AccessRouter

• 802.11
• Local Mobility
• Packet Voice
• High Data Rates

Core InternetBackbone
AggregationRouter
AggregationRouter
Authentication

HomeNetworks
AccessRouter

• DSL/Cable
• High Speed Internet Access

Ad HocNetworks
4GRadios

• Allow Peer-to-Peer Communications
• Self Configuring

• Unifies access technologies (wireless and
  wireline)
• End-to-end Internet Service
• common mobility management and control
• common transport infrastructure
• common services infrastructure

72

• Architecture and Design for Heterogeneous
  Networks
• Enable end-to-end communications over
  heterogeneous networks WPAN, WLAN, WMAN, W-WAN,
  and Internet.
• Secure and Cooperative Routing over Ad Hoc
  Networks
• Provide security and incentive to enable the
  relay-based hop-by-hop transmissions.

73
Beacon Triggering by Data Traffic

• Three types of beacons (for position information)
• BEACON message
• REQ (Carrying position)
• Data packets (Carrying position)
• Beacon request
• Receiving REQ
• Overhearing data transmission
• Beacon sending
• Only if the request interval is smaller than
  threshold
• For packet sending
• Use local topology information for forwarding if
  request sent interval is smaller than threshold
• Otherwise, send REQ to neighbor

74
Route Searching

• How to find a path without beacon?
• Depend on forwarding states greedy or recovery
  
• Greedy forwarding
• Find a neighbor closest to the destination
• Recovery forwarding
• How to forward when there is no neighbor closer
  to the destination?

75
Membership Management in Local Zone

• Membership reporting by mobiles nodes
• Leader election
• Moving between different zones

76
Membership Reporting in Local Zone

• A group member sends REFRESH to leader to report
  its membership
• If leader is known, unicast
• If leader is not known, elect leader
• Leader election (on demand)
• Flood the REFRESH, indicating leader information
  is requested
• A leader will send back a LEADER message
• If no LEADER is received, the member announces
  itself as the leader and floods a LEADER message
  within the zone

Zone leader
Group member
Other nodes
77
Membership Management at Upper Tier

• A source needs to record the member zones
• Source announcement
• Home zone election
• Zone membership reporting

78
Protocol Overview

• Group membership management
• Packet forwarding

• At local zone tier, a leader will collect the
  positions and membership of the member nodes in
  the zone.
• At upper tier, the leader will represent the
  member zone to join a multicast tree.
• At upper tier, the source sends a packet to
  member zones At lower tier, the first node in
  the zone that receives the data packet forwards
  it to the group members.
• Both data and control packets are generally
  transmitted through geographic unicasting
  Packets for a zone are sent towards the zone
  center

Location of group members is combined with
group membership management
79
Case 1 A is the destination

• As A is the destination, B should send packet
  directly to A, so A sends CORRECT to B

A
B
C

• B sets its next hop to A

Old path
Old position
Current position
New path
80
Case 2 Greedy Mode Forwarding
A
F

• If A is closer to F than C is to F, A sends
  CORRECT to B

B
C

• B compares As and Cs positions to F, and sets
  its next hop to A if it is closer to F

Greedy
Old path
Old position
Current position
New path
81
Case 3 Recovery Forwarding
F

• If A is closer to F than B and C are to F , A
  sends CORRECT to B

A
D
B

• B compares A and Cs positions relative to F, if
  A is closer to F, B sets its next hop to A

C
Recovery mode
Greedy

• If B is the first hop of recovery, change mode to
  greedy

82
Route Optimization

• Route validation
• Delete invalid neighbors
• Update the positions of other members based on
  estimation
• Route optimization also three cases
• The first two cases are
  similar to those of BIGR
• Case 3
• If A is closer to the destination
  than where the perimeter
  mode started, broadcasts a beacon

F
A
D
O
Greedy
B
C
Perimeter
83
Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing (BIGR)

• There is no beacon, routing path is built
  on-demand

• Route searching phase
• Route optimization phase

D
x
How to find next hop without positions of
neighbors?
84
Position Update and Route Optimization

• Update next hop position when overhearing packet
  forwarding by next hop (carrying sending node
  position)

• Validate next hop
• Estimate next hop
• If both old and new positions are fresh
• If only new position is available, it will be
  used as the estimated position
• Search for new route
• If both old and new positions are outdated
• If estimated position is out of transmission
  range or no longer closer to destination than
  current forwarding node

• Optimize routing path three cases

85
Existing Multicast Routing Protocols

• Tree-based (AMRIS, MAODV, LAM)
• Utilize network resources efficiently
• Mesh-based (FGMP, CAMP, ODMRP)
• Robust

Difficult to scale due to overhead for route
searching, group membership management, and
tree/mesh maintenance over dynamic topology

• Geographic multicast (LGT, DSM, PBM)
• Only consider packet forwarding scheme
• Reduce topology maintenance overhead, but not
  scalable

86
Summary of Multicast

• Design a scalable geographic multicast routing
  scheme
• Scalable group membership management and robust
  packet forwarding
• Avoid the need to build and maintain the
  tree/mesh structure over dynamic topology
• Avoid network-range flooding of source
  information and location searches for the group
  members
• Performance scalable in terms of group size,
  network range and mobility

87
How to Manage Home Zone ?

• Home zone information update
• Home zone searching
• Home zone election

• A source sends its zone ID to home zone when
  moving to new zone
• The first home zone node floods source info to
  whole zone

• Other nodes search home zone with ring of
  increasing size.
• Source announces its current zone as home zone,
  and sets sequence number to 0 sequence number
  increases by one each time home zone changes.

• Will be triggered when a node receives a message
  addressed to home zone with ID different from
  record (due to zone update or zone announcement
  from a new source)

88
How to Handle Empty Zone ?

• Member zone
• The departing leader notifies the source
• Home zone
• The last node
• 1) Announces the new zone it is moving to as
  the home zone 2) Floods source information
  within new home zone
• 3) Sends ANNOUNCE to network with sequence
  number of home zone increased by one

89
On-going Work

• Cross-Layer Optimization and Design of Mobile and
  Wireless Systems
• Create infrastructure and algorithms to enable
  more optimal performance of the wireless system,
  by adopting an integrated, multi-layer approach
• On-going projects
• Power control and energy efficient transmissions
  in mobile Ad Hoc networks
• Architecture design and cooperative resource
  management for IP-based radio access network

Power control and energy efficiency for MANET
90
On-going Work (cont)

• Next Generation Mobile Wireless Network
  Infrastructure and Service
• Development of network infrastructure and
  services over emerging radio and computing
  technologies.
• On-going projects
• Sensor Network Applications and Services
• Programmable Wireless Networking and Service
  Infrastructure Design
• Scalable and Resilient Wireless Mesh Network
  Design
• Context-aware Mobile Computing and Wireless
  Services
• Architecture and Design for Heterogeneous Networks

91
Our Contributions

• Design an efficient on-demand hierarchical group
  membership management scheme

• Use geographic forwarding to avoid building and
  maintaining tree/mesh structure

• Introduce the home zone to avoid periodical
  network-range flooding of source information

• Combine group membership management with
  location service to avoid location searches for
  group members

92
Problems with Classical Geographic Routing
Proactive fixed-interval beaconing for positions
Difficulty in beaconing Interval setup
Difficulty in beaconing Interval setup
Too short consume Energy and create collisions
Generate unnecessary Overhead and consume energy

• Proactive fixed-interval beaconing for positions
• Beaconing interval affects accuracy of the local
  topology and routing performance
• Outdated topology gt non-optimal routing,
  transmission failures gt more network resource
  consumption
• Continuous retransmissions due to inaccurate
  position
• Reduce link throughput and fairness, and increase
  collisions gt further delay and energy consumption

Too long outdated topology
Create collisions with normal data transmissions
No optimal routing, transmission failure
More resource consumption
93
Our Contributions

• Propose two self-adaptive routing protocols

BIGR Beaconless Interactive Geographic Routing
BTGR Beacon-on-Trigger Geographic Routing

• On demand alleviate unnecessary overhead due to
  proactive beacons

• More flexible position distribution more updated
  topology, more efficient routing and less failure
  

• Self adaptive adaptive to traffic pattern and
  robust to topology changes