Modeling ROI for GIS, IT and Telecom Investments The City and County of Geopolis State of Locahoma, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling ROI for GIS, IT and Telecom Investments The City and County of Geopolis State of Locahoma,

Description:

Create once, use many: Initial investment in framework data, infrastructure and ... Stamp Fraud, eWEEK.com, published June 8, 2006 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: BA294
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling ROI for GIS, IT and Telecom Investments The City and County of Geopolis State of Locahoma,


1
Modeling ROI for GIS, IT and Telecom Investments
The City and County of Geopolis State of
Locahoma,

  • North Carolina GIS Conference
  • Public Technology Incorporated
  • GIS Forum
  • Alan Leidner, Senior Associate, Booz Allen
    Hamilton March 1, 2007

2
Why Enterprise GIS (E-GIS) is essential?
  • Create once, use many Initial investment in
    framework data, infrastructure and staff
    maximizes reusable elements, creates synergies
    and reduces the costs of applications and data
    for any one agency
  • Because all location enabled data within agencies
    is created upon a common geospatial base, data
    can be shared across agencies with minimal
    concerns about compatibility and accuracy.
    Equally so applications where components can be
    shared.
  • Enterprise standards for data quality and
    application modules can increase sharing and keep
    development and operating costs down.
  • Enterprise approach eliminates duplication of
    efforts. Also creates a large staff on common
    data, infrastructure and software supporting
    collaboration and sharing.
  • Starting GIS applications in many agencies
    spreads the load for achieving the ROI that no
    one agency or application could provide - to
    justify the initial investment to build a
    comprehensive spatial data infrastructure.

3
GIS data and applications Build once to create
many revenue streams
4
Why is assessing ROI important
  • E-GIS with significant up front investment is
    most effective in producing benefits but requires
    a leap of faith that a good ROI analysis can
    support. E-GIS is a spiritual concept but we live
    in a material world.
  • Knowing where benefits are possible can help to
    guide investment priorities and amounts. Policy
    makers often totally misjudge the value of GIS
    seeing it as an exotic system, separate from IT
    and Telecom.
  • Being able to convincingly document the potential
    of benefits can raise the profile and priority of
    GIS investments.
  • A clear articulation of benefits can help win
    advocates and champions for GIS implementation
    across the government.
  • A focus on documenting ROI can protect GIS
    efforts should there be a budget crunch.
  • Overcome institutional resistance to
    collaboration Assessing benefits can identify
    implementation and collaboration strategies that
    will yield the greatest benefits.
  • Even if you have an existing E-GIS system, an ROI
    assessment can document currently levels of
    benefits to support requests for new investments

5
How to keep GIS investment and operating costs as
low as possible
  • Acquire data regionally, state-wide or nationally
    to capitalize on economies of scale (Imagery for
    the Nation Transportation features for the
    nation) and reduce or eliminate duplication.
  • Reduce per unit costs of buying hardware,
    software and services by aggregating procurement
    regionally and state-wide.
  • Eliminate the duplicate creation of data layers
    build one, build best.
  • Make sure data and applications comply with all
    standards to maximize opportunities for re-using
    components, and sharing across agencies.
  • Barter municipal and county data for important
    private and institutional data sets.
  • Share applications with other jurisdictions.
  • Win grants from federal and state agencies by
    showing them the advantages of municipal data and
    application builds.
  • Collaborate with professors and students at local
    university (UCGIS member?)

6
E-GIS benefit tiers
  • Direct financial collect more taxes, reduce law
    suit payouts, increased federal funding, collect
    more fines and fees
  • Direct safety gains taken as saved lives, reduced
    injury and reduced property damage For example,
    a reduction in murders due to pattern
    identification, or reduced cardiac arrest deaths
    due to faster 911 response times. The unnecessary
    loss of life has a value to society. Lower crime
    can lead to direct financial benefits by reducing
    court courts.
  • Productivity gains Enables a greater output per
    worker. Often results in better service to the
    public or the shift of employees to areas of
    greater need. Can lead to direct financial
    benefits if revenue collection processes are
    involve. Also, if reduction in workforce is made
    possible.
  • Indirect safety, social, operational and
    strategic benefits Where improvements lead to
    acknowledged increases in effectiveness that
    cannot be measured but can be estimated.
  • Economic benefits Increased business activity,
    new construction, more jobs, etc.
  • (Most GIS applications can produce ROI in several
    or all benefit categories)

7
Examples of multi tier benefits when a police
department implements modern crime management
systems that help reduce violent crime
  • Direct financial Reduced overtime, lower
    liability, reduced court and prison costs,
    reduced probation and parole costs
  • Direct safety Reduced murder rate reduction
    in major crimes, lives saved, faster response
    time
  • Productivity gains Less time lost to manual
    record keeping, faster information look-ups
  • Indirect social benefits Better community
    relations, higher police morale
  • Economic development Improved investment
    climate, more tourists and visitors downtown,
    increased jobs
  • focus of this analysis

8
Some methods and assumptions
  • Convert all benefits into dollars because thats
    what decision makers understand.
  • Assume that financial managers find investments
    acceptable if there can be a full return in
    benefits from that investment within 5 years.
  • Underestimate benefits and overestimate costs.
  • Whenever possible have agency managers set cost
    and benefit estimations themselves with the
    guidance of examples from other jurisdictions
    (expert choice exercise)
  • Take only a percentage of benefits Not all
    benefits from applications involving GIS can be
    attributed to GIS
  • Let benefits build as in real life Full benefits
    are achieved only after a number of years.

9
NYC Killer Apps
  • School bus routing In late 1970s Federal
    Education mandated NYC calculate distance from
    student residence to school in order to qualify
    for 30M in school bus funding. Mainframe
    application using TIGER file. Benefit 30M
    direct financial
  • Complaint system geocoding Validate and
    normalize address in mainframe applications and
    allow complaint information from public (street
    lights, catch basins, potholes, etc.) to be
    routed to the correct service yard. Now used in
    311 system. Benefit uncalculated but in the Ms
    in productivity/efficiency
  • Watershed filtration avoidance EPA required NYC
    to comply with a large number of mandates to
    avoid building a 10 billion filtration system
    for its Catskill reservoir system. GIS mandated.
    Benefit Avoids 500M to 1B in capital interest
    payments
  • CompStat Crime mapping using centerline file,
    addressing and geocoding helps reduce murders and
    other violent crime 70 over last twelve years.
    Benefit Value of 1,400 less murders annually.
  • West Nile Virus Aided efforts to control the
    disease through a predictive model that targeted
    spraying and supported mitigation efforts.
    Benefit Deadly disease now under control
  • September 11th Emergency Mapping and Data Center
    (EMDC) and satellites provided information and
    analysis support to response and recovery.
    Benefit Incalculable

10
Characteristics City and County of Geopolis in
the State of Locahoma
  • City and County of Geopolis are coterminous and
    under one government
  • Population 1,000,000 exactly 1/300th the
    population of the U.S.
  • State of Locahoma, population 6,000,000 or 1/50th
    the population of the U.S.
  • Total cost of developing GIS framework data and
    infrastructure before 2007 7,500,000
  • Annual maintenance of framework data and
    infrastructure 300,000
  • GIS central staff 6 employees, annual cost of
    employees 600,000 _at_100,000. Total GIS staff in
    Geopolis for agencies covered by this analysis
    45 FTE
  • Within Geopolis 120 murders were committed last
    year
  • Area 30 miles by 33.3 miles 1,000 square miles
  • 5,000 miles of roads, sewers pipes and water mains

11
More characteristics City and County of Geopolis
in the State of Locahoma
  • Geopolis Gross Municipal Product 40 Billion
    annually
  • 12Trillion annual national GDP / 300M
    population 40,000 per person x 1M population
  • Expected cost of disaster events 100M
    annually, 1B over 10 years
  • 300 billion in damage over 10 years from major
    US events / 300 1B/10 100M annually
  • Geopolis payouts for liability annually 50M
  • Total budget from taxes and revenue sharing 5
    billion annually
  • Total expenditures 5 billion annually
  • 10,000 County and City employees excluding
    teachers
  • Geopolis contains a significant port and
    airport, and major mass transit and freight hubs.
    Geopolis is 25 on the HSIP ranking, and is a
    UASI urban area eligible for HLS funds.

12
Core investment in GIS data, computers,
telecommunications, applications and central staff
  • Cost for aerial photography, feature extraction,
    address ranges and point addresses, parcel layer,
    structure layer, hydro, transportation, topo,
    etc. 3,000,000
  • Cost for improved existing computer
    infrastructure, architecture and internet
    capabilities


  • 2,000,000
  • Cost for improved cable, fiber and wireless
    communications 2,000,000
  • Cost for comprehensive geocoding application
    500,000
  • 10 percent annual maintenance on all
    investments 750,000
  • Annual cost for 6 full time technical staff
    _at_100,000 600,000
  • ROI model assumes a total of 45 GIS staff hired

13
Chart of cost of E-GIS versus benefits
14
Benefit type Direct Financial - Census Count
  • Background Data
  • 1) Phoenix, Arizona estimates increase federal
    and state funds per person is 432
  • 2) NYC estimates use of GIS lead to 5 increase
    in census count. Benefits could range up from
    100 per person.
  • 3) Delaware County, Ohio estimates that use of
    GIS led to a 37.5 increase in census count and
    estimates that each person counted represented
    375 in federal and state assistance
  • Assumptions for the City and County of Geopolis,
    in the State of Locahoma
  • Current population 1,000,000
  • Value of each person counted in state and federal
    assistance 200
  • Additional headcount due to GIS in 2010 census
    5 or 50,000
  • Benefits
  • Annual additional benefit 10,000,000
  • 2007 0 2008 0 2009 0 2010 5,000,000 2011
    2016 10,000,000
  • Cumulative benefits over ten years 65,000,000
  • Costs Prior to 2007 Data, applications,
    infrastructure 1M 2007 2016 annual costs
    for maintenance and 3 FTE _at_100K 400,000
  • Cumulative costs over 10 years 5,000,000

15
Benefit type Direct financial Parcel based
taxes and fees
  • Background Data
  • Washenaw County, Michigan found 10,000 parcels
    missing from tax rolls
  • Oblique angle photo vendors report 3 increase in
    assessments due to photo ID of improvements
  • Assumptions
  • Current property based taxes take in 1B annually
  • Through GIS photo ID and improved parcel
    processes 1 annual increase in revenue is
    possible.
  • Benefits realized in 20 increments over five
    years
  • Benefits
  • Total potential benefit 10,000,000 annually
  • 2007 2M, 2008 4M, 2009 6M, 2010 8M, 2011
    10M 2012 2016 10M
  • Cumulative benefits over 10 years 80M
  • Costs
  • Investment prior to 2007 in data, applications,
    process change and infrastructure 2M. Annual
    maintenance including 3 FTE 500K

16
Benefit type Safety Saving Lives and Preserving
Property Crime analysis
  • Background Data
  • http//www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_16.html
    shows homicide rates in urban areas.
  • NYC murders have dropped from 2,200 in the early
    90s to under 600, a reduction of 1,400 annually
  • Assumptions
  • The Geopolis murder rate is 12/100,000 annually
    for a total of 120 annually.
  • Using geospatially improved dispatch and crime
    analysis along with better policing techniques, a
    12.5 reduction in the murder rate over a five
    year period is possible.
  • Every murder can be valued at 1M in police,
    medical, court costs, and in victim costs.
  • Assume murder rate is reduced by three each year
    starting in 2007 and levels out after 2011
  • Assume 20 of benefits can be attributed to GIS
  • Benefits
  • 2007 600K 2008 1.2M 2009 1.8 2010
    2.4M 2011 - 2016 3.0M 10 Year Total 24.0M
  • Benefits dont yet take into account reduced
    costs of less crime less trials, less prisoners,
    improved business climate, etc.
  • (Does not take into account reductions in 8740
    violent crimes annually)
  • Costs
  • GIS data, applications and infrastructure 1.5M
    Maintenance including 8 FTE 950K

17
Benefit type Safety 911 emergency response
  • Background Data
  • USA Todays Robert David noted in a series of
    articles that more than 1,000 savable lives are
    lost annually because of slow response time to
    sudden cardiac arrest.
  • Calculations show about 1 cardiac arrest death
    per 5,000 people annually
  • Dr. Robert J. Myerburg estimates that every
    reduction of 1 minute in response time reduces
    fatalities by 10.
  • Improved dispatch technology and systems, street
    address data, routing and AVL capabilities, can
    easily lead to a 1 minute or more improvement in
    dispatch time from initial call to arrival on the
    scene.
  • Assumptions
  • Geopolis suffers 200 annual deaths through sudden
    cardiac arrest annually and can reduce fatalities
    by 20 annually through faster response times and
    equipping emergency responders with
    defibrillation devices.
  • Four lives will be saved in 2007 increasing by
    four until 2011 when benefits level off.
  • Assume each life is worth 1M in lost taxation
    and benefit payments to family.
  • Assume 50 of benefit can be attributed to GIS.
  • Benefits
  • 2007 2M 2008 4M 2009 6M 2010 8M
    2011-2016 10M Total 10 years 80M
  • (Does not take into account deaths from heart
    attack, respiratory failure, bleeding, etc. where
    time is of the essence.)
  • Costs
  • Data, application and infrastructure 2.5M
    annual maintenance including 4 FTE 650K

18
Benefit type Productivity gain Field force
automation
  • Background Data
  • GITA assessment of field force productivity gains
    through the use of location aware technologies is
    greater than 25.
  • Many utility companies have, for years, reported
    remarkable increases in field force productivity
    through the use of improved address data,
    accurate utility maps, routing and AVL.
  • Assumptions
  • Geopolis, with a total municipal and county
    workforce of 10,000 has 1,000 field workers who
    can directly benefit from field force automation
    including AVL, routing, wireless communications,
    accurate location data and maps, etc. Workers
    include sanitation and street cleaning workers,
    social workers making home visits, highway work
    crews, health inspectors, building and other
    inspectors, etc.
  • Assume annual salary of workers is 50,000
    annually for a total annual salary of 50M.
    Potential field automation benefits equal 50M x
    25 12.5M
  • Assume potential of 20 of benefits can be
    attributed to E-GIS and location technologies or
    2.5M annually. Assume benefits can be captured
    at 10 increments over the course of 10years.
  • Benefits
  • 2007 250K2008 500K2009 750K.2016 2.5M
  • Costs
  • Assume 2M for data, applications and
    infrastructure Annual maintenance including 3
    FTE 500K

19
Chart of cost of E-GIS versus benefits
20
Some observations
  • Based on total benefits Geopolis E-GIS pays back
    in its third year even as it supports continuing
    maintenance and staff support.
  • Based only on direct financial benefits Geopolis
    E-GIS fully pays back investment in its fifth
    year.
  • Given a full 5 year payback standard for capital
    investment Geopolis could have justified an
    additional 7M 81M in GIS/IT/Telecom
    investments.
  • After 10 years ROI calculations, depending on
    benefit type, range from 110M 308M.
  • Multiply by 300 to assess the scale of benefits
    if done nationally at the county and municipal
    level.

21
References
  • Sabety, Pari Reamer, Andrew and Clark, Lindsay
    November 30, 2004. Understanding Our Communities
    Funding the American Community Survey. The
    Brookings Institution, Cities and Suburbs.
    http//www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/reamer/200411
    30.htm (Census)
  • McKeefry, Hailey Lynne, Louisiana Stamps out
    Food-Stamp Fraud, eWEEK.com, published June 8,
    2006 http//www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972079,
    00.asp (Fraud)
  • Davis, Robert 2006 Six Minutes to Live or Die.
    USA Today, May 20,2006, http//www.usatoday.com/ne
    ws/nation/ems-day2-cover.htm (911 emergency
    response)
  • Fenster, Jeffrey MD, etal. Armed with AEDs,
    Police Save Lives by Cutting Response Time,
    Journal Report August 7, 2002, American Heart
    Association http//www.americanheart.org/presenter
    .jhtml?identifier3004253 (911 emergency
    response)
  • Werschuler, Tim Rancourt, Julie The
    Dissemination of Government Geographic Data In
    Canada Guide To Best Practices, Page 11.
    GeoConnections, Winter 2005, Version 1.2
    (Economic development)
  • Lipton, Eric, Breathtaking Waste and Fraud in
    Hurricane Aid, New York Times, published June 27,
    2006 http//www.nytimes.com/2006/06/27/washington/
    27katrina.html?ex1309060800en1683e5fa71ecfb90e
    i5090partnerrssemcrss (Fraud)
  • Multihazard Mitigation Council (MMC) of the
    National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS),
    Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves, 2005
    http//www.nibs.org/MMC/MitigationSavingsReport/Pa
    rt1_final.pdf (Disaster prep.)
  • Nebert, Douglas U.S. FGDC and Geospatial
    One-Stop Activities Related to Return on
    Investment, Report to ROI Workshop, Ispra,
    January 2006 http//sdi.jrc.it/ws/costbenefit2006
    /presentations/nebert.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com