Title: The Primary Health Care Access Program PHCAP in the Northern Territory'
1The Primary Health Care Access Program (PHCAP) in
the Northern Territory.
- John Boffa Public Health Medical Officer Central
Australian Aboriginal Congress.
2Introduction
- Funds pooling what is it and how does it work in
the NT? - What can be funded the NT core functions of
Aboriginal Primary Health Care? - How will this deliver new and expanded Aboriginal
community controlled health services? - Where will we find the workforce?
3Funds Pooling
- New and existing Commonwealth and existing
Territory per capita PHC funding is being pooled
to create funding benchmarks. - Only happening in 10 out of 21 NT health zones as
only 57 million nationally in the PHCAP
rationing of allocation to 2000 people per zone. - The integrated Commonwealth / Northern Territory
funding Model.
4Integrated funding model in the NT
- 1. Average national MBS usage 2000/2001 380
per person.
2. PHCAP remote benchmark 4 x 380 1520
per person.
3. PHCAP urban benchmark 2 x 380 760 per
person (Darwin only).
4. PHCAP grant cap 1520 less 215 1305 per
person (mixed mode only add MBS and section 100
).
5. Integrated PHCAP grant cap 1305 684 (NT
per capita av.) 1989 per person.
5Funding model continued
- 5. 2 x PHCAP benchmark 760 684 1444 per
person. (Darwin)
6. Commonwealth regional grant cap in Central
Australia 19 116 (pop) x 1305 Cwlth
exisiting inscope (11,035,961) 13,910,419.
7. Total new funding for all 11 zones.
8. Currently only 7 new zones funded plus the
conversion of the CCTs to the PHCAP.
6Funds pooling advantages
- Equality of funding
- Existing NT range across 11 zones is 347 to
1115 per capita - Existing Cwlth range across 11 zones is 0 to
1038 per capita - The integrated funding model achieves equal
funding in all zones but not necessarily equity.
7Funds pooling advantages
- Flexibility of funding.
- The NT is contributing cash in order to fund
new and expanded ACCHS. - States who are not pooling will attempt to
improve their outcomes in Aboriginal health by
reorienting their own services.
8Funds pooling advantages
- Increased funding
- The average PHC per capita contribution in the NT
is almost twice the MBS national average - Other states do not have this level of PHC
expenditure in Aboriginal health. They would need
to find new money to contribute significantly to
a funds pool. - Recognition of ACCHS as core to the health system
/ less duplication and competition by the State.
9Funds pooling disadvantages.
- Complexity.
- States refusing to play ball with enough cash to
make it worthwhile. - Non Aboriginal funding issues in some remote
areas.
10What can be funded? Core functions of CPHC
- Clinical services.
- Support services.
- Social and preventative programs.
- Policy and Advocacy.
11Clinical services 1
- Primary clinical care
- treatment of illness using standard treatment
protocols - 24 hour emergency care
- 24 hour access to the advice of a doctor either
on site or via telecommunications - provision of essential drugs including provision
of medicine kits to designated holders - continuing management of chronic illness
12Clinical services 2
- Preventative care
- immunisation
- antenatal care
- appropriate screening and early intervention
- STI and other communicable diseases control
- secondary prevention of complications of chronic
diseases
13Clinical services 3
- Clinical support systems such as a
pharmaceutical supply system and a comprehensive
health information system which will include - a population register and recall system
- a chronic disease register and recall system
- collection of data to enhance evaluation and
quality assurance.
14Support services internal
- Staff training and support
- orientation of new staff in the management and
presentation of major illnesses and in cross
cultural and other issues - Aboriginal Health Worker education
- continuing education opportunities for all staff
15Support services internal
- Management systems
- Financially accountable and include effective
recruitment and termination practices. - Where PHC is managed by a community controlled
health service the organisation must be
adequately resourced to implement and maintain
good management systems
16Support services internal
- Adequate infrastructure at the community level
- staff housing and clinic facilities
- functional transport facilities to allow access
to appropriate health care when needed. This
includes the availability of roads and airstrips
as well as the use of road and air transport
where needed.
17Support services external
- appropriate visiting specialists and allied
health professionals - medical evacuation services where needed
- access to hospital facilities
- costs of transport and accommodation to access
specialist and ancillary care where needed - education and training i.e. TAFE, university
level etc.
18Social and preventative programs
- Resources to enable community initiated
activities to address the underlying determinants
of ill health. - eg. Substance misuse
- Early childhood Nutrition
-
19Policy and Advocacy
- Resource participation in joint planning and
policy development. - Community consultation.
- Lobbying.
- Submissions.
- Analysis of health policy and data.
- Publishing and dissemination.
20How will this lead to new ACCHS?
- Contact team community development role.
- Zonal Aboriginal Steering Committees.
- Consultancies health service implementation plan
and community control plan. - Establishment of Health Boards.
- ACCHS or Aboriginal health boards contracting
another provider.
21Who will work in these new health services?
- AHWs shortage.
- Nurses shortage.
- Doctors shortage- almost exclusively from
overseas. - Need for local Aboriginal management.
- Governance training for health boards.
22Conclusion
- Funds pooling has more advantages than
disadvantages in the NT. - Need the PHCAP to be fully funded to avoid the
drip feed problem. - Can deliver the NAHS vision that all Aboriginal
communities should have an ACCHS.