CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY

Description:

To examine how this approach has changed and developed over time. ... Feminists point out the lack of a focus on the power of patriarchy women are missed out. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:746
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: allber
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY


1
CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY
2
AIMS
  • To understand the critical criminological or
    Marxist approach.
  • To examine how this approach has changed and
    developed over time.

3
THE TRADITIONAL MARXIST APPROACH
  • Marx write very little about crime.
  • Marxist views of crime developed by others, eg
    Bonger (1916) Chambliss (1975).
  • Based on the belief that society is based on
    exploitation.

4
THE BASIS OF CRIMINAL LAW
  • All laws are for the benefit of the ruling class
    and reflects their interests.
  • Property law benefits the rich as the poor have
    little worth stealing.
  • Violence is not allowed, but the army and the
    police use violence to keep the ruling class
    secure.

5
THE DOMINANT HEGEMONY
  • Ruling class impose their values through
    religion, education, media.
  • This forms the framework on which new laws are
    created.
  • What people believe are a result of their own
    beliefs are the result of beliefs imposed upon
    them.

6
LAW ENFORCEMENT
  • The interpretation and enforcement of the law are
    also biased towards the ruling class.
  • Police and judicial system more likely to act
    against working class than ruling class.

7
INDIVIDUAL MOTIVATION
  • Capitalism is based on competition, greed and
    selfishness.
  • Crime is a direct result of the values held by
    people in a capitalist society.
  • Poor people also driven to crime by their poor
    conditions.

8
CRIME CONTROL
  • Crime provokes fear in communities.
  • This is used to justify the use of heavy policing
    in working-class areas.
  • This can lead to the arrests of any sections of
    the population who are against capitalism.

9
VAGRANCY LAWS
  • Chambliss studied vagrancy laws.
  • Claimed they were passed to support the ruling
    class by preventing people moving to another
    place and looking for higher wages.
  • The laws were justified by the government who
    said they were to provide protection against
    vagrants.

10
CRITICISMS
  • What about the victims of crime? They tend to be
    ignored.
  • All laws are seen to be the result of the ruling
    class what about other influences on law-making?

11
THE NEW CRIMINOLOGY
  • Taylor, Walton Young (1973)
  • Cant just look at motivation and influences of
    the criminal.
  • Must see how the behaviour of the victim,
    offender, media and criminal justice system all
    interact.

12
IDEOLOGY AND NEW CRIMINOLOGY
  • Sociologists of crime and deviance should
    criticise the established capitalist order.
  • Should uncover and explain crimes of the rich.
  • Should critically examine the role of the police,
    media and criminal justice system.
  • Are criminals expressing their anger at
    capitalism?
  • See page 230.

13
CRITICISMS OF THE NEW CRIMINOLGY
  • Traditional Marxists claim it has moved too far
    from Marxism.
  • Too romantic a view of criminals.
  • Feminists point out the lack of a focus on the
    power of patriarchy women are missed out.

14
MARXIST SUBCULTURAL THEORY
  • Capitalism controls us in two ways1.
    Ideological dominance in the media.2. Economic
    pressures eg mortgages.
  • Only groups on the edge of society can provide
    resistance as they are less constrained.
  • Biggest group is working class youth.

15
BRAKE (1980)
  • Clothes and language of working class youth
    express their disdain for capitalism.
  • Magical resistance an illusion as their
    problems are not solved.
  • Society changes but one constant is always there
    working class will be exploited.
  • All will be trapped like their parents

16
LEARNING TO LABOUR
  • Paul Willis study of working-class boys in
    secondary school (1977)
  • They realise the sort of jobs they will get and
    therefore reject school.
  • This rejection ensures they will fail their
    belief therefore comes true.
  • They have been instrumental in bringing about
    their own failure.

17
CRITICISMS
  • Subcultures can be interpreted in many different
    ways.
  • Writers wanted to prove that working-class
    culture was an attack on capitalism and they
    fixed the evidence to prove this.
  • Claimed by Cohen (1980) who said it was a biased
    analysis.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com