Fiscal Policy Frameworks: Monetary Policy Implications, and Intergenerational Financial Funds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Fiscal Policy Frameworks: Monetary Policy Implications, and Intergenerational Financial Funds

Description:

Fiscal Policy Frameworks: Monetary Policy Implications, and Intergenerational ... Began investing nearly four years ago. FUM currently around NZ$13 billion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Web76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fiscal Policy Frameworks: Monetary Policy Implications, and Intergenerational Financial Funds


1
Fiscal Policy Frameworks Monetary Policy
Implications, and Intergenerational Financial
Funds
Adrian Orr Chief Executive Officer 24 August 2007
2
Outline for today
  • Objectives and structure of the New Zealand
    Superannuation Fund
  • Strategic Asset Allocation
  • Challenges Ahead

3
New Zealand Superannuation Fund
  • Crown financial institution
  • Began investing nearly four years ago
  • FUM currently around NZ13 billion
  • Projected to be over NZ30 billion in five years
  • Total staff now 31
  • Including seven investment policy staff

Purpose is to smooth the cost of New Zealand
superannuation
4
Demographic shift underway
Source New Zealand Treasury
5
Demographic bubbleSmoothing superannuation
costs over time
Source New Zealand Treasury
(Year ended 30 June 2006)
8
7
6
5
4
Percentage of Nominal GDP
Net NZS Expenditure
3
Capital Contribution Plus Net NZS Expenditure
2
1
0
2007
2013
2019
2025
2031
2037
2043
2049
2055
2061
2067
2073
2079
2085
2091
2097
2103
6
Governance arrangements of the NZSF
  • A clearly defined portfolio of Crown financial
    resources
  • Property of the Fund
  • - Clearly defined in legislation
  • Capital contributions
  • - Transparent funding process set out in
    legislation
  • Capital withdrawals
  • - According to legislated algorithm
  • - From late 2020s
  • Policy credibility and commitment by establishing
    legislation

7
Governance arrangements of the NZSF (Continued)
  • managed by an independent governing body
  • Separate Crown entity Guardians of New Zealand
    Superannuation
  • Independent nominating committee for board
    membership
  • Expertise requirement for board membership (not
    citizenship)
  • Ministerial directions must be consistent with
    boards duty, be published, and board has regard
    to them
  • Conflicts of interest handled through disclosure
    (and securities legislation)

8
Governance arrangements of the NZSF (Continued)
  • and clear accountability
  • Statement of investment policies, standards and
    procedures
  • Audited financial statements
  • Independent performance review
  • Official Information
  • Statement of Intent and Annual Report

9
Legislative objectives of the NZSF
  • The Guardians . must invest the NZSF in a
    prudent, commercial basis, and in doing so, ..
    consistent with
  • Best-practice portfolio management and
  • Maximising return without undue risk to the
    Fund as a whole and
  • Avoid prejudice to New Zealands reputation as a
    responsible member of the world community.

Add-value by returns gt risk-free rate
10
Strategic Asset Allocation
  • The Funds comparative advantages include its
  • Long-term investment horizon matching long-term
    liabilities
  • Ability to invest across the near full range of
    asset classes globally and
  • Liquidity risk premium due to no capital
    withdrawals until at least 2020
  • Key decision
  • Mix of markets and assets that the Fund will on
    average be exposed to

11
Distinguishing characteristics of New Zealand
Superannuation Fund
  • Long-term horizon
  • Little need for liquidity
  • Long-dated real assets more appealing given
    Funds smoothing role
  • Tax status

Key Factors shaping the asset allocation
12
Long-term Strategic Asset Allocation
Emerging
Markets
Global Small-
Equities, 2.0
Cap Equities,
6.0
Property (NZ
and Global),
10.0
New Zealand
Equities, 7.5
Private Markets,
Commodities,
20.0
5.0
Global Large -
Fixed Interest,
Cap Equities,
15.0
34.5
Listed Equities
Other Growth Assets
Fixed Interest
13
Key modeling results 30 years(versus
liabilities)
  • Expected value added 21 2037 GDP
  • Downside standard deviation 14 of 2037 GDP
  • Probability negative value added 8

14
Risk depends on time horizon
Return Volatility (Annualised Standard Deviation)
0
5
15
30
10
25
20
Horizon (years)
Correlations also horizon dependent
15
Some simulation results
NZSF Estimate
16
Investment process - evaluation
  • Evaluation Process
  • Quantitative increment to total Fund risk-return
  • Alignment managers/counter-parties
  • Uniqueness and re-investment options
  • Implementation risk?

17
Investment process - approvals
  • Approval Process
  • Basic model is to appoint, align and delegate
  • Executive gt Investment Committee gt Board
  • Must pass
  • Legal
  • Tax
  • Financial / Accounting
  • Investment hurdles

18
Our performance to date
  • Fund size 13.3 billion as at 31 May 2007
  • Returned 15.30 p.a. since inception (Sept 2003),
    against risk free rate of 6.45.
  • Diversification is on track
  • But
  • Many markets are full priced and volatile
  • Everyone is chasing private markets and alpha
  • Need to be able to take advantage of stressed
    asset prices

19
Market performanceFour consecutive strong and
stable years(NZSF current portfolio back-cast
on historical data pre-2003)
Annual return
Average annual return 4.3 Standard deviation
9.9 A 10 standard deviation 1.2bn in
returns for the Fund
Excess return relative to risk-free rate
20
Challenges ahead
  • Organisation transition
  • From development to established institution
  • Building scalable processes to achieve
    sustainable excellence
  • Managing sustainable growth
  • Management complexity (investment discovery,
    assessment, implementation, relationships)
  • Employing skilled people

21
Implications
Conclusion
NZSF Example
  • Inter-temporal smoothing
  • Compensate government for investment
    risk
  • Compare versus risk-free alternatives

1) Be clear about objectives
  • Forward looking returns
  • Monte Carlo balance sheet impact
  • 2) Consciously decide what risks
  • are worth bearing
  • Look beyond headline returns
  • Avoid agency issues
  • Risk-adjust all investments

22
Fiscal Policy Frameworks Monetary Policy
Implications, and Intergenerational Financial
Funds
Adrian Orr Chief Executive Officer 24 August 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com