Title: More than Money: What
1- More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform? - Alan Liebowitz
- President
- OMNIA Life (Bermuda) Ltd.
2More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- In the wake of the Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act, Banks
and Insurance Companies Agree - Uniformity Efficiency must be brought to
Insurance Regulation.
3More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- The Problems
- Inconsistent Inefficient Regulation
- Barriers to Product Introduction/ Innovations
- Anti-Competitive Rate Pricing Regulation
- Inconsistent Market Conduct Regulation
- A Patchwork of Privacy Regulation
4More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- How badly do bank-insurance organizations want
this uniformity? - Banks and Insurers are willing to pay for Both
state and federal regulation if the federal
option promises one set of uniform rules.
5More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Several organizations have seized on the idea
that a federal system means loss of revenue for
states. - Optional Federal Charter is the only idea that
does not mean loss of revenue to states.
6More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- The Elements of the Optional Federal Charter
(OFC) - Unified Federal Regulator in the Department of
the Treasury - Charters National Companies/Agencies
- Regulates Solvency, Market Conduct, Accounting of
national entities
7More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- States Continue to regulate and license State
chartered entities - States Continue to regulate solvency, market
conduct, and accounting standards for State
chartered entities.
8More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Preserves State Premium Tax Structure
- Cost of federal regulation borne by those
entities that choose it. - States can use resources previously spent on
regulating companies that choose national
regulation for other purposes.
9More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Preserves State Guaranty System
- Only resorts to federal system if a particular
state does not meet certain minimum standards.
10More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- For those who have concerns that the dual banking
system isnt the right model for insurance, go
home and look at the state and federally
chartered banks co-existing on the same street. - Does it appear to you that consumers are harmed
by having so much choice?
11More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Why the Interstate Compact wont achieve
uniformity. - States are free to join the Compact, or withdraw
from it, at their leisure. - States may agree to the Compacts rules for one
product line but withhold agreement for another.
12More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- The Compacts Catch-22
- To achieve uniformity, States must subordinate
their right to regulate insurance to the drafters
of the Compact. - To retain sovereignty, States will resist
transferring their adjudicatory powers to the
Compacts stewards.
13More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- The NAICs proposed solutions will be more than 5
years in development and who knows how long in
implementation. - Model laws, to be uniform, require legislators to
forfeit their right to legislate. - Show of hands How many state legislators are
willing to give up this right?
14More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Congressional Action will present the same
dilemma - House Financial Services Committee Chairman Mike
Oxley and Subcommittee Chairman Richard Baker
will create a federal nexus - mandates - that
require state legislators to give up their right
to legislate.
15More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Federal Standards could set minimum federal
criteria to which states would be free to layer
additional requirements. - Far from achieving uniformity, minimum Federal
Standards would exacerbate the patchwork system
of disparate state laws, by adding a federal
regulatory layer.
16More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Alternatively, federal standards could be
mandatory and exclusive they would not be an
alternative to state regulation they would
replace it. - State insurance commissioners would become agents
of the federal government. - State legislators lose the right to legislate
insurance questions.
17More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Optional Federal Charter is the only
modernization proposal that preserves state
regulation as it is constructed right now. - Legislators dont have to decide between
uniformity and sovereignty. - States continue to regulate all insurance
questions in their state, not just those the
federal government leaves to them.
18More than Money Whats Really at Stake in the
Quest for Insurance Regulatory Reform?
- Preserving State Insurance Regulation
- The debate about whether Congress will act or
not is over Congress will introduce reform bills
this year.