Food vs. fuel and land use- Why we need Intern. Bioenergy trade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Food vs. fuel and land use- Why we need Intern. Bioenergy trade

Description:

Food vs' fuel and land use Why we need Intern' Bioenergy trade – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: infor178
Category:
Tags: bioenergy | food | fuel | hazel | intern | land | need | trade | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Food vs. fuel and land use- Why we need Intern. Bioenergy trade


1
Food vs. fuel and land use- Why we need Intern.
Bioenergy trade agric. revolution Intern.
Workshop Woodfuel supply chain- Sharing
experienceWarwick, 15-19 Sept/2008
  • Frank Rosillo-Calle
  • Research Fellow
  • CEP/BEG
  • Imperial College London
  • f.rosillo-calle_at_imperial.ac.uk
  • www3.imperial.ac.uk/people/f.rosillo-calle

2
The food vs. fuel dilemma
  • The agricultural and forestry sectors face huge
    challenges and opportunities as a rising demand
    for an increasingly diverse range of products
    emerges.
  • Markets for the classical six "Fs" Food, Feed,
    Fuel, Feedstock, Fibre and Fertiliser, is
    expanding rapidly driven by a combination of
    growing population, and rising per-capita demand
    for non-food natural products.

3
The growing concern with biofuels
  • Recent studies questioning some environmental and
    social benefits of biofuels have intensified the
    debate e.g. see FAO (2007) Royal Society
    (2008).
  • A common feature of many studies is that they
    lack rigorous long term scientific data to back
    up most of the claims.
  • Worse, most of the criticisms have been blown up
    out of proportion by the general press and
    detractors of biofuels.
  • Production of biofuels is complex given the key
    role of agriculture, the potential impacts of
    climate change, increasing demand for food and
    energy, and environmental scrutiny.

4
Agricultural dilemma
  • What then could be the potential role of
    agriculture in meeting such demand without
    jeopardising its primary role of providing food?
  • What would be the economic, social, political,
    and environmental consequences?
  • How is this increasingly complex situation
    managed will be crucial.

5
The dilemma of raising food prices
  • The farmer needs higher prices so that he/she can
    re-invest
  • But who is the real beneficiary
  • The poor in particular needs to keep prices low
  • Needs social safeguards
  • Raw material plays a small role in prices
    increases
  • Transport, transformation, speculation () real
    culprits

6
1. Fact
  • Rise on commodities international prices since
    January 2000
  • Source Institute for Applied Economic
    Research (IPEA), 2008

next
7
1. Fact
  • Growth of world agricultural production
  • Source FAO

next
back
8
Which course of action?
  • There are not easy and single answers
  • By transforming agriculture (i.e. through new
    investment, education, skills, greater equity,
    etc) and fair trade of agricultural products
    (including biofuels) it is possible to produce
    far more food and substitute 5-20 of petrol in
    transportation by biofuels without affecting food
    supply.
  • What is needed is to transform the way we
    produce, transform, and distribute agricultural
    products.

9
How much land is available?
  • There are more than 2Gha of underexploited land,
    plus 700 Mha of other type of land that could be
    used for non-food purposes.
  • Direct land competition is a myth rather than a
    reality considering that merely 1 of the global
    land area is currently dedicated to biofuels.
  • A complex web of factors e.g. lack of investment
    in agriculture, short term investment objectives,
    speculation poverty.
  • As Hazel Wood (2007) put it .., more food is
    produced than needed to feed the entire world
    population and at prices that have never been so
    low. The fundamental hunger problem today is one
    of income distribution rather than food
    shortages.

10
2. Land use
  • Area for agriculture
  • Source Institute for International
    Trade Negotiations (ICONE), 2008

next
back
11
Land alone isnt the issue
  • India has stabilised crop land area by increasing
    productivity through capitalization, RD, skills
  • Ravindranth (2006) has suggested that even with
    modest increases in crops productivity, India
    could free up one-third to one-half of Indias
    current cropland for production of bioenergy.
  • And keeping up with food demand ()

12
A problem of lack of investment, skills, capital,
market
  • Agriculture has suffered from chronic under
    investment in most parts of the world e.g. in the
    1980s about 17 of international development aid
    was for agriculture, but in 2005 this was just
    3.
  • Modernisation of agriculture is essential as it
    will lead to greater overall production.
  • Agriculture needs massive new investment, for
    innovation and diversification which could truly
    transform agriculture as we know it.

13
Science-based agriculture ()
  • Farming cannot be seen as a backward activity,
    but as a science driven industry.
  • Investment on modern scientific research for
    agriculture led to dramatic yield breakthroughs
    in the last century
  • Example, in England wheat yields took nearly 1000
    years to increase from 0.5 to 2 t/ha/yr, but just
    40 years increased to 6 t/ha/yr (Hazel Woods,
    2007).

14
Give farmers the right conditions!!
  • Give the farmers the right conditions and they
    will be able to produce far more food, energy and
    industrial products.
  • Think of the poor African farmer, only if he/she
    could have access to the same conditions farmers
    have in the industrial countries!
  • This requires many fundamental changes e.g. land
    ownership, fair distribution, good educational
    level, availability of capital, skills, finance,
    marketing knowledge, and so forth.

15
Promote freer biofuels trade
  • It is illogic to tax biofuels while fossil fuels
    do not have any trade barriers or any other
    restrictions.
  • Walter et al (2008 www.bioenergytrade.org
    studies show that international bioenergy trade
    is essential to ensure the sustainability and low
    cost of biofuels
  • Remove artificial barriers and leaving the market
    to play much greater role in determining the
    right and fair price rather than governments.

16
Over-concern with biofuels (?)
  • It is right to ask ourselves
  • Will our concern with the environment,
    sustainability, and biodiversity leads to the
    imposition of requirements so stringent that it
    will hinder (or even prevent) rather than enhance
    the development of biofuels?
  • It is important to devise strategies that allow
    for the best possible use of biomass resources on
    a fair playing field.

17
There is not a perfect fuel!!
  • There is not any magic formula or perfect fuel
  • Biofuels are being subjected to unprecedented
    scrutiny
  • Why arent we applying the same criteria for all
    fuels, particularly fossil fuels?
  • Think of the Canadian shale-oil exploration!
  • Support not KILL biofuels!

18
Main references
  • FAO (2007) Stainable Bioenergy A Framework for
    Decision Makers, UN-FAO
  • Hazel P Woods S. (2007) Drivers of Change on
    Global Agriculture, Philosophical Transactions of
    the Royal Society B. (2008) 363 495-515
  • ROYAL SOCIETY (2008) Stainable Biofuels
    Prospects and Challenges, Royal Society, London,
    ISBN 978 0 85403 662 2
  • Walter A, Rosillo-Calle, F, Dolzan P, Piacente E,
    Borges da Cunha K., (2008). Perspectives on fuel
    ethanol consumption and trade, Biomass and
    Bioenergy (in press)

19
Freer trade fairer trade
  • We need an agricultural revolution, primarily in
    developing countries
  • Freer international bioenergy trade
  • Fairer international trade
  • Equal playing field for biofuels

20
End
  • Thank you!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com