(Final) achievements on Higgs boson searches at LEP2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

(Final) achievements on Higgs boson searches at LEP2

Description:

open the possibility to explore a wide mass range. Combined results from the 4 experiments ... with mass close to mZ. 114.4 GeV. Assuming BR(h inv)=1. mh 114.4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: dap6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: (Final) achievements on Higgs boson searches at LEP2


1
(Final) achievements on Higgs boson searches
at LEP2
  • Rosy
    Nikolaidou

  • CEA/DAPNIA/SPP
  • Introduction
  • The Standard Model Higgs boson
  • More exotic scenarios
  • Conclusion

Results will be finalised this year
2
Introduction
  • Started operating in 1989. Stopped at
    November 2000
  • Energy spread 91ltEcmlt 209. Since 1995
    Ecm gt mZ
  • ? 1000 pb-1 per experiment,
  • ? 688 pb-1 /exp above WW
  • threshold
  • The rise of energy at LEP
  • open the possibility to explore a wide mass
    range
  • Combined results from the 4 experiments
  • ALEPH DELPHI L3 OPAL are denoted

LEP
ADLO
3
SM Higgs boson production, decays
  • Higgsstrahlung WW,ZZ Fusion

mH ??s - mZ
We can go beyond the kinematic limit
H?bb dominant
Channels
4
Fundamental tools b-tagging
  • Silicon ?vertex detectors (e.x DELPHI)
  • Hit precisions ?10 ?m in R?
  • ?15 ?m in Rz
  • B-hadron characteristics
  • B-hadron life-time ?1.6 ps
  • Flight distance ? 3 mm
  • Impact Parameter ?400 ?m
  • Decay products of B-hadrons
  • large IP, PT , lead to tracks
  • originating from SV
  • Combination of (SV mass, IP,
  • decay length,PT of leptons, e.t.c)
  • to a single b-tagging variable

DELPHI
SV
PV
DELPHI
Z? events
u,d,s,c
b
Data/MC agreement ? 5
5
LEP2 cross sections
qq, Z? dominant but can be reduced ZZ
irreducible for H, hA searches WW irreducible
for HH- searches
  • Background cross sections

103
SM Higgs cross section ( lt 1pb )
102
10
1
10-1
? (pb)
?s GeV
6
Tools Multidimensional analyses
  • Multidimensional techniques used
  • to reach the best S/B discrimination
  • (Neural Network, Likelihood ratio)

H??
L3
Hqq
Kinematic fits with E,P conservation and Z mass
constraint performed to improve on signal mass
reconstruction
7
SM Higgs boson results
ADLO
  • 3 selections with increasing purity of a 115
    GeV/c2 signal

D/Bck 61/60.3
D/Bck 187/188.1
Signal 5.8
Signal 11.4
D/Bck 22/20.2
Signal 2.7
  • All channels contribute
  • Hqq,H??,Hll,qq??
  • ? event select A discriminant variable and a mass

8
ToolsStatistical analysis of the results
  • For a powerful statistical analysis of the
    combined results
  • (per channel and experiment)
  • Selection of signal-like events in each
    researched channel
  • ? event 2d p.d.fs of a discriminant variable
    and a mass
  • Test the compatibility of data with B-only or
    SB hypotheses
  • from S and B rates and 2d pdfs
  • using a likelihood ratio test statistics
  • which simplifies into
  • -2lnQ2stot-2?Niln(1si/bi)
  • (stot total signal rate, si/bi s/b prob per pdf
    bin)
  • e.g
  • Expectations on 2lnQ, one experiment in 2000
  • Kinematic edge _at_ 116 GeV
  • Powerful separation for MH110 GeV/c2
  • More difficult for MH115 GeV /c2

DELPHI
9
SM Higgs boson results
ADLO
Median, ?1?, ?2? bands expected from background
only Data consistent with a Higgs signal of
MH115.6 GeV/c2 Expected curve from Bcksignal
of 115 GeV/c2
  • LEP result corresponds to 2.1? over background
  • At 95C.L mHgt114.1 GeV/c2(obs) mHgt115.4
    GeV/c2(exp)
  • Compatibility with background fluctuation
    hypothesis 3.4
  • Compatibility with a signal of 115.6 GeV/c244

10
A golden candidate in the SM search
  • Event compatible with SM Higgs boson decay
  • ee-?HZ ?bbqq
  • A 4-jet event with 2 b-jets
  • Some properties
  • MH114.3? 3 GeV/c2
  • Strong S/B probability ratio4.6

11
SM Higgs boson searches a summary
  • From indirect limits from
  • EW precision measurements
  • (LEP,SLC,Tevatron)
  • MH?196 GeV/c2 95 C.L
  • From direct searches at LEP
  • MH?114.1 GeV/c2 95 C.L
  • Likelihood test preferred mass
  • MH115.6 GeV/c2

12
2 Higgs Doublet Models
  • In these models 2 complex Higgs doublets (?1 ?2
    )
  • Five Higgs bosons(h0, H0, A0, H?)
  • Parameters tan? (?2/?1 VEV ratio) ?(mixing
    angle of h0 H0 )
  • ?(Higgs mass parameter) Ao ( trilinear
    Higgs-sfermion coupling)

e.g
Couples to Type I Type II
d-type leptons ?2 ?1
u-type quarks ?2 ?2
d-type quarks ?2 ?1
sin2(?-?) ?HZ(SM) ?cos2(?-?) ?HZ(SM)
Large at small tan? Large at large tan?

mA? mh SM topologies and New
topologies searches are used
hA ?bbbb, ??bb Also h0?A0A0,invisible
e.x MSSM
ghff ? cos? e.x fermiophobic (? ?/2)
13
MSSM Higgs searches
ADLO
  • Combine hZ , hA searches
  • Scenario mh-max Allows max
  • theoretical bound on mh w.r.t tan?

ee- ?hA
ee- ?hZ
mh?91GeV/c2 , mA?91.9 GeV/c2 0.5 lt tan? lt
2.4 excluded
14
MSSM Higgs searches
ADLO
  • Combine hZ , hA searches
  • ScenarioNo mixing

ee- ?hA
ee- ?hZ
mh?91.5 GeV/c2 , mA?92.2 GeV/c2 0.7 lt tan?
lt 10.5 excluded
15
Flavor independent Higgs search
ADLO
  • In some extensions to SM H-b coupling could be
    suppressed
  • e.g Search for ee- ?hZ , h ?hadrons (qq, gg), Z
    ?anything
  • Assuming Br(h ?hadrons) 1
  • Min eff (h ?qq,gg ) used
  • No more btagging applied
  • Results
  • Mh?112.9 GeV/c2 95 C.L
  • assuming ?hZ ?hZSM
  • Strong cross section limits

112.9 GeV
16
Invisible Higgs searches
ADLO
  • ee- ?Z ? hZ, h(stable, undetectable particles)
  • h decays
  • In MSSM h ? ?0?0
  • Other models h ? JJ (Majorons)
  • Signatures
  • large Emiss dileptons or dijets
  • with mass close to mZ

114.4 GeV
Assuming BR(h ?inv)1 mh?114.4 GeV/c2
or Up to mh 110 GeV/c2
?hZ/ ?SM ? 40
17
Non fermionic Higgs searches
ADLO
  • Searches in which Higgs couples to bosons only
  • e.g Decay ee- ?hZ?(??)(anything)
  • h0??? small (0.1 at SM , mh90 GeV)
  • can be enhanced in (2HDM type I models,
  • modified MSSM e.t.c)
  • Look for energetic isolated photons

Assuming SM production rates,BR(h?ff)0
mh?108.2 GeV/c2
18
Model independent search for scalars
  • ee- ?S0Z, (Z?ee,??)
  • (S0 ? had, inv.,??, lept, stable)
  • Compare recoil mass spectrum
  • with an expected S0 signal
  • S0 masses down to 1KeV

Limits ?S0Z ? ?HSMZ
?lt1 mS0 lt81 GeV/c2 95C.L

(absolute mass limit for

SM coupling strength)
19
Search for Charged Higgses
ADLO
  • In 2HDM models
  • ee- ?HH-
  • 3 channels
  • cscs, cs??, ????
  • Assume(cs, ??) saturate the decays
  • But BRs are not constrained
  • Production cross section ?(mH)
  • Background from ee-?WW-
  • Results
  • Assuming Br(H?cs, ? ?)1
  • m H? gt78.6 GeV/c2 95 C.L

78.6 GeV
20
Search for H? ? W?A
OPAL
  • In a 2HDM type I model
  • H? ? W?A, (A ? bb,??-)
  • dominant if
  • tan?gt1, kinematically allowed
  • 3 final states are studied
  • HH- ?W?AW?A ?qqbbqqbb
  • HH- ?W?AW?A ?l?bbqqbb
  • HH- ???W?A ???qqbb
  • Results on (mH?, mA) plane

tan?10
tan?1
68 GeV
42
60
mA
tan?100
mH?
60
50
21
Search for doubly charged H?? bosons
  • Appear in left right symmetric
  • models and can be relatively light
  • Decay to leptons, preferably ?
  • Signatures 4l, 4lEmiss
  • h?? unknown Yukawa coupling
  • For h?? gt10-7 H?? decays fast
  • Results
  • m H?? gt98.5 GeV/c2
  • for BR(H?? ? ? ? )1

22
Light Higgs Yukawa production
  • Processes I,II suppressed if
  • sin2(?-?) small, mAmhgt?s
  • Look at Z?bb h/A ?bb ??

I
II
III
Then III dominant
enhancement factor of the bb h/A couplings
23
Conclusions
  • For the SM Higgs boson
  • MHlt196 GeV/c2 , MH?114 GeV/c2 , MH115.6 GeV/c2
  • LEP has explored and constrained a lot of models
    beyond the SM
  • Is the Higgs boson responsible for the EW
  • breaking mechanism?
  • (Tevatron, LHC, Linear Colliders)

Still pending question
wait for
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com