Federal Efforts to Restrict Local RightofWay Franchising and Franchise Fees - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Federal Efforts to Restrict Local RightofWay Franchising and Franchise Fees

Description:

Digitalization breaks down the 'stove pipes' of 'separate ... Inadequate PROW Authority. Inadequate Rent for use of public property. No PEG $ or new capacity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: michelle9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Federal Efforts to Restrict Local RightofWay Franchising and Franchise Fees


1
Federal Efforts to Restrict Local Right-of-Way
Franchising and Franchise Fees
  • Nicholas Miller
  • October 19, 2005
  • Montgomery County CCAC

2
Program
  • De-stabilizers
  • Congressional Efforts
  • National Organizations Position

3
Convergence The Technological De-stabilizer
  • Digitalization breaks down the stove pipes of
    separate technologies for separate services
  • Regulatory distinctions become market entry
    barriers
  • Is fiber/digital changing the traditional
    economies of scale?

4
Serious Problem for RBOCs
  • Core business voice leaking to competitors
  • VoIP works
  • Distance and usage insensitive
  • deliverable over cable modem and broadband
    wireless (Wi-Fi)
  • Current copper not able to deliver Big Broadband
    (more that 3Mbs)
  • Future services (and revenues) are bandwidth
    intensive
  • Video on demand
  • Data file transfers
  • Holographics, etc.

5
Brand XThe Legal De-stabilizer
  • National Cable Telecommunications Assn v.
    Brand X Internet Servs., 125 S. Ct. 2688 (2005).
  • FCC is entitled to deference in its decision
  • cable modem is an information service
  • Information services fall within Title I
  • FCC has authority under Title I to set
    appropriate regulations for information services.

6
Brand XThe Legal De-stabilizer
  • There is NO statutory guidance in Title I to the
    FCC other than protect the public interest
  • Congress faced with trust FCC discretion? or
    give statutory direction
  • Problems with Discretion
  • Universal Service is funded under Title II
  • Community needs and interests are addressed in
    Title VI
  • CALEA, Access by Disabled, 911 are under Title II

7
SBC and Verizon Plan Different Deployments
  • Verizon is fiber to the home
  • Analog television
  • Packet switched (IP) internet access
  • Analog voice
  • Capacity to greatly expand the packet-switched
    services
  • SBC is fiber to the curb
  • Similar to Comcast in amount of fiber
  • Uses existing telephone twisted wire pair for
    home drops
  • Has limited bandwidth into the homeabout 6Mbs

8
Telephone Video Fiber
  • Verizon fiber rollout for video Looking for
    quick, truncated franchises.
  • SBC argues that its IPTV is an information
    service not needing a local franchise at all.

9
Industry Pushing Congress and State Legislatures
for Relief
  • Local governments have won recent state
    legislative battles
  • Nevada
  • Texas
  • Virginia
  • Louisiana

10
Congress Responds?
  • New Rules to Limit FCC Discretion?
  • Universal Service in a Digital Age?
  • Role for State/Local Regulation?
  • Local Right-of-Way Rent?

11
Congress Activity To Date
  • House Staff Draft
  • Ensign Bill (S. 1504)
  • Smith/Rockefeller (S. 1349) Blackburn/Wynn
    Bills (H.R. 3146)

12
Talking Points Vision
  • Preserve local authority to
  • Allocate and manage public rights of way for the
    benefit of everyone.
  • Design and impose taxes that are consistent with
    local needs and maintain adequate revenue.
  • Provision broadband services.
  • Expand localism in video services.

13
Talking Points Vision (cont.)
  • Protect consumers from Market Imperfections.
  • Enhance homeland and hometown security.
  • Assure nondiscriminatory access to the full range
    of communications services.

14
Local Governments Position
  • Enthusiastic about the benefits IP.
  • The federal government must respect and preserve
    state and local property rights and police
    powers, including
  • right-of-way ownership and management,
  • zoning, and
  • Consumer protection.
  • Monopolies should be regulated.
  • Preserve local taxing authority.

15
Local Governments Position (cont.)
  • Dont lessen the effectiveness of
  • universal service,
  • CALEA,
  • 911 services,
  • access for persons with disabilities,
  • or consumer protections.
  • Users of the public rights-of-way should pay fair
    prices for the use of public property.
  • PEG access promotes localism, open government,
    free speech, and public participation in
    community affairs.

16
S. 1504 (Ensign), In Detail
  • Reoeaks existing communications laws
  • Creates a regulation-free world for voice and
    video services
  • Severely limits local govt provisioning of
    telecommunications services
  • Voids all existing franchises

17
S.1504, In Detail
  • Preserves 5 of gross revenue for video but
    not really
  • 1) Limits fee to cost of managing the
    rights-of-way
  • 2) Numerous exceptions to gross revenues-- 15
    less than current franchises
  • 3) FCC empowered to reduce the franchise fee in
    the name of fairness
  • Only 4 PEG channels
  • No opportunity to change with technology
  • No PEG
  • No I-Net
  • No Assured Access to broadband
  • No build out requirement
  • No redlining prohibition
  • Does require basic telephone service to all
    residents

18
The Federal Cable Franchise bills--Blackburn
(House) Smith (Senate)
  • Treats Similar Providers Differently
  • Allows SBC to avoid any franchise (state or
    local).
  • Incumbent cable operators with state PUC
    certificates (as a CLEC) may no longer need a
    local cable franchise.
  • Franchise Fee Problems
  • No mechanism to enforce and audit fee.
  • PEG Support and Obligations
  • No obligation for any financial support for local
    PEG use of the video systems.
  • Limits PEG to traditional video PEG channels
    tied to the incumbent operators franchise.
  • No mechanism to enforce PEG.
  • No provision for adjusting capacity or technology
    enhancements.

19
The Federal Cable Franchise Bills --Blackburn
(House) Smith (Senate)
  • No I-Nets
  • Neither capacity nor financial support.
  • Economic Redlining
  • No prohibition
  • Providers choose where and how to build-out their
    facilities.
  • Does prohibit the denial of services based on
    income in an area.
  • EEO Rules
  • Current FCC EEO rules do not apply.

20
House Staff Draftthe BITS Bill
  • No change to existing Title II or VI
  • Any packet switched service (including
    wireless) falls under new provision
  • Network neutrality and interconnection
  • No obligation to lease network facilities
  • Permits non-discriminatory franchise fees
  • Preemption of State Prohibitions on Local
    Government Broadband Service

21
House Staff Draft--BVS Provisions
  • Federal franchise for Broadband Video Service
    local registration
  • FCC sets customer service and signal quality
    rules
  • LFA retains right to require
  • PEG capacitybut no additional
  • I-Net capacity if operator offers I-Net service
  • 5 franchise fee for all video related
  • Regulation of PROW entry and occupancy

22
House Staff Draft--BVS Provisions (cont.)
  • No local audit authority.
  • LFA may require bond, insurance, and compliance
    with ROW management.
  • FCC arbiter of all disputes.
  • REDLINING placeholder.

23
Be Wary of the Deal
  • Offer
  • 5 Franchise Fee
  • Right of Way Management
  • PEG Capacity

24
Why this Deal is unacceptable
  • Inadequate PROW Authority
  • Inadequate Rent for use of public property
  • No PEG or new capacity
  • No Enforcement Authority
  • Ineffective Consumer Protection
  • No Buildout requirement

25
Ways to Help
  • Go to TeleCommunity webpage
  • www.telecommunityalliance.org
  • Explain the dispute to local media

26
Miller Van Eaton We Assist Local Governments
In AchievingThe Full Benefits Of The
Communications Age For Their Communities
Nicholas P. Miller nmiller_at_millervaneaton.com Mill
er Van Eaton, P.L.L.C. 1155 Connecticut Avenue,
N.W. Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.
20036-4301 Phone 202-785-0600 Fax 202-785-1234 W
ebsite www.millervaneaton.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com