A%20comparison%20of%20the%20down%20valley%20flow%20for%20the%20MAP%20IOP8%20and%20IOP3%20with%20the%20numerical%20laboratory%20Mesonh%20model. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A%20comparison%20of%20the%20down%20valley%20flow%20for%20the%20MAP%20IOP8%20and%20IOP3%20with%20the%20numerical%20laboratory%20Mesonh%20model.

Description:

Rain gauges. 2.5km model. Correlation coefficient first day second day. IOP3 0.63 0.81 ... Rain gauges. 2.5km model. Wind vectors and Potential temperature. at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: cnrm6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A%20comparison%20of%20the%20down%20valley%20flow%20for%20the%20MAP%20IOP8%20and%20IOP3%20with%20the%20numerical%20laboratory%20Mesonh%20model.


1
A comparison of the down valley flow for the MAP
IOP8 and IOP3 with the numerical laboratory
Mesonh model.
Nicole Asencio, Joël Stein and Michel Chong
CNRM Météo-France and Laboratoire dAérologie.
2
Presentation
  • Introduction and numerical set-up.
  • IOP3 and IOP8 rain and wind validations.
  • Mesonh numerical laboratory to compare IOP8 and
    IOP3 reversal flow origins.
  • conclusion

3
Numerical Set-up
Non-hydrostatic MESONH model Two-way interactive
grid-nesting models Microphysics with
ice. Turbulence 1D BL89. Arpege analyses for the
initialization and the coupling every 6 hours.
2.5km model
10km model
10km model convection scheme KAFR 2.5km model
explicit cold microphysics
54 hours
22/10/99 for IOP8 27/09/99 for IOP3
20/10/99 25/09/99
4
Synoptic presentation
H
500hPa
L
20 October 1999 1200UTC
L
A
D
H
D
Surface
5
IOP3 Daily Rain validation
25 September
26 September
Rain gauges
2.5km model
Correlation coefficient first day second
day IOP3 0.63
0.81
6
IOP8 Daily Rain validation
20 October
21 October
Rain gauges
2.5km model
Correlation coefficient first day second
day IOP8 0.75
0.58
7
Wind vectors and Potential temperature at 450m
ASL
K
Cold pool
8
zoom Wind vectors and Potential temperature
at 450m ASL
K
DOW
9
IOP8 and IOP3 comparison meridional wind at the
valleys outflow
IOP8
IOP3
W
E
E
W
Thin layer maximum 200-400 meters
Deep layer maximum 1km-2km
ToceTicino valleys
ToceTicino Valleys
Como Valley
10
Presentation
  • Introduction and numerical set-up.
  • IOP3 and IOP8 rain and wind validations.
  • Mesonh numerical laboratory to compare IOP8 and
    IOP3 reversal flow origins.
  • conclusion

11
IOP3 diagnostics
Upper-level wind intesity
rain
Outflow
RAIN 0-450m WIND DIRECTION 2.8-6km WIND INTENSITY
12
IOP8 diagnostics
Upper-level wind intesity
rain
Outflow
RAIN 0-450m WIND DIRECTION 2.8-6km WIND INTENSITY
13
Sensitivity experiments
10km model
during a short period associated to reversal
flow duration 30 hours for IOP3 24 hours for
IOP8
2.5km model
Inside a small area associated to accumulated
rain location Nev no evaporation cooling
Nmt no melting and no evaporation
cooling Slope no melting and no evaporation
cooling above relief
14
IOP3 Sensitivity experiments
NEV EXPERIMENT NMT EXPERIMENT
15
IOP3 Main Origin
16
IOP8 Sensitivity experiments
NEV NMT SLOPE
RAIN REF 0-450m WIND DIRECTION 2.8-6km WIND
INTENSITY
17
conclusion
IOP8
  • IOP8
  • The reversal flow within the Toce valley mainly
    originates from the subsidence induced by the
    melting over the orography.
  • The diabatic effects over the plain contribute
    to maintain the cold low-level airmass which
    spreads over the western part of the Po valley .
  • The reverse flow extension over the plain is
    driven by the cold pool intensity.
  • The reversal flow at the regional scale is not
    sensitive to the diabatic
  • effects, the down-valley flow inside the Toce
    valley is linked to diabatic mechanisms above the
    relief.
  • The upstream flow intensity inducing the
    transition from blocked
  • to unblocked regime drives the duration of the
    reverse flow.

IOP3
18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com