Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Trends, Iss - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Trends, Iss

Description:

'Social security without borders' ... Risks around us (sickness, death, unemployment, old-age, etc. ... Many countries had poor records at the time of reform. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: ilo87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Trends, Iss


1
Pension Reformin Central and Eastern Europe and
the Commonwealth of Independent States Trends,
Issues and Challenges"Social security without
borders"Joint ISSA-CISS-OISS High-Level
Interregional Meeting on Pension Reforms in the
Americas, Central and Eastern European Countries
and the Commonwealth of Independent States 9
December 2008, Santiago, Chile
  • Kenichi Hirose
  • Senior Specialist in Social Security
  • Sub-regional Office for Central and Eastern
    Europe
  • International Labour Organization, Budapest
  • Email hirose_at_ilo.org.

2
ILOs global mandate in Social Security
  • Social Security is a core component of ILOs
    Decent Work Agenda
  • Increase member States capacity to develop
    policies focused on improving social security
    systems and extending social security coverage
  • Improve member States capacity to manage social
    security schemes and to implement policies
    focused on improving social security systems

3
ILO values and tools on social security
  • International Labour Standards
  • ILO Social Security Minimum Standards Convention
    (C.102)
  • Tripartism
  • Emphasis in social dialogue
  • Technical assistance at the country level
  • Policy advice based on research and analyses
  • Assistance in implementation schemes
  • Capacity building and training
  • Advocacy
  • Global campaign for social security and coverage
    for all

4
Social security why and what?
  • Risks around us (sickness, death, unemployment,
    old-age, etc.)
  • Development entails transformation of society
  • weakening traditional family support
  • ageing population due to lower birth rates and
    mortality rates
  • Human ageing longer life after reproduction
  • Cf. We (biological organisms) are survival
    machines robot vehicles blindly programmed to
    preserve the selfish molecules known as genes.
    Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene
  • Social security is a societal measure to respond
    to these risks

5
Widely accepted definition ofSocial Security
  • ILO Convention 102 on Social Security Minimum
    Standards defines Social Security as
  • the protection which society provides for its
    members through a series of public measures
    against the economic and social distress that
    otherwise would be caused by the absence or
    substantial reduction of earnings resulting from
    sickness, maternity, employment injury,
    unemployment, invalidity, old age or death. It
    also includes the provision of medical care and
    the provision of subsidies to families with
    children.

6
Objectives of pensions
  • Provide adequate income security for the elderly
  • Basic requirements
  • Sustainable in the long run
  • Credible for the commitment of future generations
  • Pension reform addresses these issues while
    ensuring the main objective of the retirement
    income provision

7
The Starting PositionPension System under the
State Socialism
  • Flat benefit structure
  • Favourable conditions for certain groups
  • Generous pension coverage for military services,
    maternity and child care period
  • Indexation in line with wage increase
  • Contributions transferred from enterprises
  • Any deficit covered by the general budget
  • Lower retirement ages for women

8
Regional trends Pension Reforms since the
mid-1990s
  • Change design features of public pension schemes
  • Closer link between contribution and benefits
  • Individualized benefit formulas (individual
    accounts, NDC)
  • Strengthen scheme financing
  • Retirement age higher age, equalization of men
    and women
  • Indexation from wage to price (or in-between)
  • Scale down public schemes and replace with
    privately managed individual savings

9
Challenges in Social Security in CEE and CIS
countries from ILO perspectives
  • Relatively high social security transfer
  • Concerns with long-term sustainability in the
    ageing population
  • Increasing number of migrant workers
  • Non-compliance by informal work and
    underreporting of wages
  • Weak enforcement for contribution collections
  • Vulnerable to political interventions
  • Complex and non-transparent policy and decision
    making process

10
Coverage gapsWho is excluded from the existing
systems?
  • Rural populations (predominantly farmers)
  • Urban informal economy workers
  • Small- and medium- sized enterprises
  • Part-time, casual and seasonal workers
  • Migrant workers in overseas (86 million
    worldwide, many irregular status)

11
Social security coverage for migrant workers
  • The greater flow of workers across national
    boundaries and more diverse forms of migration
    are creating new challenges, including lack of
    social security.
  • To ensure the equality of treatment in social
    security for migrant workers, there is an
    emerging need for international and regional
    coordination, by multilateral and bilateral
    agreements.
  • ILO Conventions and Recommendations
  • C.118 (1962), Equality of Treatment (Social
    Security)
  • C.157 (1982), Maintenance of Social Security
    Rights (R. 167, 1983)
  • C.165 (1987), Social Security (Seafarers)
    (Revised)
  • C.19 (1925), Equality of Treatment (Accident
    Compensation)
  • EU regulations
  • Regulations 1408/71/EEC (1971), 574/72/EEC
  • Regulation 859/2003/EC (2003) extends the
    provisions to third-country nationals

INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION
12
Percentage of population aged 65 years and over,
1950-2050, CEE countries
Source United Nations 2006
13
Percentage of population aged 65 years and over,
1950-2050, CIS countries
Source United Nations 2006
14
Types of pension schemes
15
Pension privatization in CEE and CIS states
  • Countries which introduced mandatory,
    privately-managed pensions
  • Hungary, Poland(), Latvia(), Bulgaria,
    Estonia, Croatia, Slovak Republic, Romania,
    Ukraine
  • Kazakhstan(), Russia, Azerbaijan,
    Kyrgyzstan(), Tajikistan(), Turkmenistan()
  • Countries with PAYG pensions and considering
    reforms
  • Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lithuania,
    Moldova, Serbia
  • Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Uzbekistan
  • Countries which maintain PAYG pensions
  • Czech Republic, Slovenia
  • Notes () NDC, () Full privatization

16
Problems with Pillar II system
  • Unpredictability of the future benefit level
    facing the volatile financial market risk
  • Limited redistribution results in more inequality
    (e.g. gender inequality)
  • Difficulties in private market provision of
  • Life annuities (adverse selection)
  • Full indexation of benefits
  • High administrative costs by private funds
  • Transitional costs The gap in the financing of
    the Pillar I system created by diverting part of
    the contributions to the new Pillar II system
  • Transition cost will increase government spending
    (borrowing) in short- to medium-term.

17
How transition costs will occur?(per cent of
GDP)
18
Replacement rates, Poland
Males
Females
Chlon, Agnieszka, "The Polish Pension Reform of
1999," in Fultz, E., Ed., Pension Reform in
Central and Eastern Europe, Vol. 1, ILO
Budapest, 2002.
19
Effectiveness of multi-pillar pensions
  • Are the objectives of the multi-pillar reform
    appropriate?
  • Primary goals Protection against poverty in
    old-age
  • Secondary goals Bolster economic growth through
    increased savings
  • Did countries meet initial conditions on
    macroeconomic stability, financial market
    readiness, moderate indebtedness, and a low risk
    for corruption?
  • Many countries had poor records at the time of
    reform.
  • Have the reform considered options to expand the
    coverage to those outside the formal pension
    system?
  • Have multi-pillar reforms achieved the intended
    macroeconomic impact such as risk diversification
    in investment portfolio, increased savings,
    capital markets development, better labour market
    incentives?
  • These objectives remain largely unrealized.
  • Fiscal deficits have grown in many countries.
  • Misleading terminologies
  • Parametric reforms versus paradigmatic reforms
  • Single-pillar versus multi-pillar reforms

20
Donor dependence CEE and CIS
Source Independent Evaluation Group World
bank, Pension Reform and the Development of
Pension Systems An Evaluation of World Bank
Assistance, 2006
21
(Cf.) Donor dependence Latin America and the
Caribbean
Source Independent Evaluation Group World
bank, Pension Reform and the Development of
Pension Systems An Evaluation of World Bank
Assistance, 2006
22
Indexation of pensions in payment
  • Recently many countries have adopted change in
    the indexing of benefits
  • 100 average wage growth
  • 100 inflation
  • Average of inflation and wage (Swiss method)
  • Changing indexation from average wage to price
    would improve financial status in the long run
  • However, the pension level relative to the
    average wage will decrease in the later stage of
    retirement life

23
Dynamics of pensions transfer relative to
output/payroll
  • The following formula holds
  • ?(P/Y) (N D)/Y (i g) P/Y
  • where
  • Y Output (or total payroll)
  • P Pensions payment
  • N Pensions for the newly retired
  • D Pensions for the deceased retired
  • g Rate of growth of output (or total payroll)
  • i Rate of indexation of pensions
  • Hence, the condition for non-increasing P/Y is
  • ?(P/Y) 0 ? i g (N D)/P

24
Directions in Pension Reform
  • The dilemma facing the CEE and CIS countries is
    to ensuring the long-term sustainability of the
    pension system in the face of rapidly ageing
    population, while at the same time meeting the
    minimum standards, such as the ILO Convention
    102, to ensure adequate level of income to the
    protected workers and their families.
  • Public pension schemes can produce unfunded
    liabilities to be financed through the
    intergenerational transfer mechanism. Their
    sustainability critically depends on whether the
    working generation is committed to pay
    contributions for the elderly generation. The
    proposed reform should be supported by the future
    contributing generations.
  • Based on the diagnosis of the current scheme, a
    wide range of policy options should be presented
    together with the assessment of their financial
    impacts. A well-informed and participatory policy
    dialogue lays the foundations for democratic
    process in the policy making, and assists in
    making rational decisions based on a broad
    consensus.
  • Pension is a long-term system, and pension reform
    is a long-term process. A well-managed reform
    process supported by strong long-term commitment
    and continuous efforts of all the key
    stakeholders is critical for the successful
    implementation of the pension reform.

25
Thank you for your attentionFor further
information, please visit our webpage
atwww.ilo.org/secsocwww.ilo.org/budapest
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com